Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
cherroy
post Mar 3 2010, 06:45 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(PCHo @ Mar 2 2010, 07:58 PM)
Hi all,

Anybody using the Dell 2209WA LCD?
I just upgraded to Windows 7, but somehow the native resolution doesn't seem the same when I am using photoshop.
I see jagged edges when I zoom the pic to fit my window.
Funny thing is I didn't have this problem b4 on Vista.

Will reinstalling the driver help or is there any updated driver for the LCD? I searched through Dell's website and googled around, can't seem to find it....
*
You mean only occur when using photoshop? and the rest no problem?

Highly likely is about driver issue.
cherroy
post Mar 6 2010, 03:44 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(busyman @ Mar 5 2010, 04:41 PM)
mayb i should pay a visit to pc shop..

to compare tn panel as i forgot how tn panel look lk..
haha
*
99% display unit or LCD out there is TN panel.
IPS and PVA are rare as both of them, price wise is significant higher than TN, which make it hard to sell while shops don't like to have stock that hard to sell one.


cherroy
post Mar 12 2010, 12:36 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Heihachi777 @ Mar 11 2010, 10:54 PM)
Is it waste of money if buying a dell ultrasharp lcd just for pc gaming purpose as i found the response time is longer compare to common lcd???

People paid the premium for ultrasharp mainly for photo editing right? Any other purposes? Thx
*
Err... I don't think many can notice the differentiate between 5/6 ms vs 2-4 ms response time

Ultrasharp series may come with adjustable height, rotated stand compared other only can tilt a little only, also with premium panel which means can exchange 1 for 1 if there is any dead pixel, while for normal series, only more than 5-7 dead pixel only can claim warranty.

I would say different product cater different needs from customers.

cherroy
post Mar 12 2010, 11:09 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Heihachi777 @ Mar 12 2010, 01:13 AM)
Yes, i noticed the warranty claim is excelled but can u really actually spot the difference (by putting side by side) during game playing or movie watching?
*
The answer is yes, you can see the difference especially putting side by side, especially the colour issue and viewing angle, (for an IPS vs TN), but for those TN ultrasharp series vs TN normal series, I don't know about it, as never bought TN ultra-sharp series.
cherroy
post May 6 2010, 05:54 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Frankly speaking, a lot of people being lured to Full HD marketing gimmick as well.

The reason why I said so, is because a lot of people have a misconception that Full HD monitor has sharper and has better screen display.

In real fact, if your source is not full HD resolution, there is little difference between a Full HD monitor with non-full HD monitor. As at that time (without Full HD source aka 1920 x1080), it is the panel quality matter the most.

Want to utilise the HD, then you must have both, ie. monitor + source.
cherroy
post May 6 2010, 11:54 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Maxieos @ May 6 2010, 07:12 PM)
Agree , I dont like full HD , still prefer 19:10 , since mostly for me , getting more work space.How often of you all watching HD movie ? You must need a real HD format to fully perform on a Full HD LCD.
*
16:9 seems "elongated" for ordinary computer task. But 16:9 is the trend right now. It is must difficult to find a 16:10 monitor, majority goes to 16:9 ratio.

The most annoying marketing gimmick/strategy of Full HD is when sales person try to convince customer to buy a Full HD TV to watch Astro. doh.gif

Astro is on 480 if not mistaken, and even the new Astro Beyond which is HD, you just need a HD ready monitor which can full utilise the HD already, as Astro Beyond is under 720 or 1080i which is not yet Full HD definition as well.

Correct me if I am wrong.

We are still seriously lack source of Full HD until nowadays.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0185sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 05:32 AM