slower in clock to clock raw performance, no hyper threading, no intergrated graphic (inside CPU), i5 turbo mode
Hardware CPU comparison list
|
|
 Nov 16 2010, 08:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Penang   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Penang
|
QUOTE(egyprince @ Nov 16 2010, 09:34 AM) is the integrated graphic so useful? i thought we already got a dedicated GPU.  CPU + built-in graphic baru 35W TDP do u sense the power of intel?  combine with NV optimus mode, AMD cannot fight (battery efficiency) QUOTE(astria @ Nov 16 2010, 10:03 AM) not that Hyper Threading is really useful in the first place... basically, clock for clock and core for core, AMD will lose... AMD excels in price and having a complete platform... it's integrated Radeon graphic is way more useful than Intel GMA... multi threading optimized is on the way, since in the future less people use single core machine |
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 01:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Penang
|
QUOTE(Mr.Docter @ Nov 16 2010, 01:06 PM) so you mean that you are paying for something that you'd less utilized at the moment we speak? up to user  when u running a few heavvy programs together, at least your CPU time wont dominate by single program. Win7 is multi thread optimized |
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Penang
|
QUOTE(Mr.Docter @ Nov 16 2010, 02:56 PM) relax, i just want to test you. lol. chillin'  haha |
| Change to: |  0.0223sec
 0.72
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 06:03 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.