Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Hardware CPU comparison list
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 12:40 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
Hi dear sifus, I hope I'm asking at the correct place hehe... I just came across this article from notebookcheck mentioning the 1.8GHz Dual-core Atom D525 Atom D525: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Newsentry.153...a05a31ce.0.htmlI was just wondering what is the difference between the Atom and the CULV processors? Many many nice ASUS notebooks are coming out soon Please excuse my noobishness haha, just curious Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 12:55 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jul 2 2010, 12:51 PM) Basically on power consumption and cpu performance? Thanks for the reply Lee bro~ Atoms will always consume less power than even the weakest CULVs? 1.8Ghz dual core Atom better or worse than, say a 1.3Ghz duo core CULV? The numbers are very confusing to me haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 01:22 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jul 2 2010, 01:03 PM) CULV SU7300 TDP is 10W and atom N450 is 5.5W, even atom N280 is 2.5W what you say?  For the D525, its TDP is 13W, which usually fit inside the nettop.... The other main reason is atom usually paired with GMA 950/500/3150 which is weaker than the GMA 4500MHD paired with CULV.. Oh I see, no wonder netbook battery life lasts for so long haha~ So... will the D525 in the new ASUS Eee PC be better than the SU4100/7300 etc. in the new ASUS UL20a? Very blur
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 03:51 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jul 2 2010, 01:29 PM) SU4100/SU7300 still better  and also Asus UL20A in MY now should be using SU2300... Yay, good good haha Yup, I went to find that particular UL20A model after you introduced it to me, kind of rare lo (RM1899)... I'm waiting for the new model with the 33% Boost and DDR3 RAM Thank you very much for your help~
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 05:38 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jul 2 2010, 04:15 PM) Don't think there is any plan for Asus for 12'' with Core-i UM.. Yalo, that's sad... Any other 11.6 inchers that will come with Core-i UM? So far only heard of the M11x having those~ Those processors' performances will be better than CULVs? O____O
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 06:02 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jul 2 2010, 05:51 PM) Well, those are the replacement for the old CULV  The latest by now is Acer 1830TZ with Pentium U5400... Wah.... that means I have to wait ar T___T I kind of like the ASUS 1 How much is the Acer? How is the U5400's performance compared to CULV or Core-i UM? I apologize for so many questions haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 10:33 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(Ultima @ Jul 2 2010, 07:02 PM) asus malaysia dun intend to bring new asus ul series which is using core i um.. if not, i will wait for the new model to come.. they said they hav phased out ul series, meaning no new model will come to malaysia i guess..  i kinda like how asus oc the culv with their turbo33, n with discrete gpu and longer battery life compared to others with culv.. OMG!! That is very very very bad news eh I was so looking forward to those laptops ar >_____< I'm looking for a Portege T110 rival I kind of love the insanely long battery lives hehe~
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 2 2010, 11:50 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(Ultima @ Jul 2 2010, 11:19 PM) u series also ok wat... same design, new i core series, long battery life also (eventho its been reduced from 12 hours to 10 hours, well, they r using standard i core series) Yeah, they are quite good actually, but they are way over my requirements haha~ They seemed expensive too I'm looking for an 11.6 incher and I don't really need the graphic card~ I already have my Qosmio F60
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jul 3 2010, 09:35 AM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(JJKTP @ Jul 3 2010, 01:15 AM) Better wait for Fusion I guess. Will do~ Let's wait and see Thank you thank you~
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Nov 21 2010, 11:23 AM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(astria @ Nov 19 2010, 05:21 PM) actually my bad, let's put it this way... Conroe (65nm Core 2) was the first tick... tick being no more Netburst but Core architecture... then Penryn (45nm Core 2) was the first tock... using 45nm instead of 65nm... lower heat, higher clock then comes Nehalem "tick" (45nm Core i quad core)... integrated memory controller and then Westmere "tock" (32nm Core i hex core and dual core)... juz switching to 32nm, nothing more... so Sandy Bridge will be the next "tick"... ve yet to see wat's the architecture like... Philosopher astria haha Darn, guess I'll have to wait until next year 1st quarter already for Sandy Bridge.... very promising~ When is lightpeak coming? Hopefully it will be more or less at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Nov 22 2010, 10:54 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(astria @ Nov 21 2010, 11:33 PM) depends on ur work... if u need to deal with Photoshop on a daily basis, u will want 8GB... for casual users, 2GB is already enuf... gamers, 4GB... that's the general guideline... it's really up to u... For me, how many GB RAMs also not enough haha Anyway, dear lowyat sifus, I've just had a quick browse through Wikipedia on Sandy Bridge (Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge_...oarchitecture))Based on the table showing the new processors, there are a few things which I don't really understand.. I thought i7s usually have 4 cores 8 threads one? What's so special about the i7s with 2 cores and 4 threads? And what's their differences with the i5s? Sorry for noobish question hehe Just curious~ Thanks thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Nov 23 2010, 12:25 AM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Nov 22 2010, 11:27 PM) Basically the faster i5 with bigger cache.... There is two section i7 i7 6xxM is dual core i7 7xxM/8xxM/9xxM is Quad core.. Thanks for the explanation bro I wonder why they named those i5 with an extra 1MB cache as i7s Anyway, I'm eying on those i7 quad cores
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Mar 16 2011, 01:41 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
Yo guys, I guess this article is worth posting here since most people are still unsure of whether the new SB CPU will have much affect on gaming performance: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-...ce.49600.0.htmlFor example, whether to go for N53sv (i5-2410M + GT540M@RM2.7k) or Inspiron 15R (i7-2630QM + GT525M@RM2.7k)? Verdict (quoted from the link): » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « After all the tests were done, we were able to draw two conclusions. One, Intel's Sandy Bridge architecture is so powerful that even the entry-level model, the Core i3-2310M, is without a doubt fit for gaming. Two, mid-range graphics cards reach their gaming limits so quickly that the choice of processor hardly has any influence over the refresh rate. In three of the four games tested, the CPUs produced results within one fps of each other. Only in Call of Duty: Black Ops did the difference between the least and most expensive CPUs rise to a still not-very-significant 4 fps.
Occasional gamers, therefore, don't need to dish out for a more powerful CPU when choosing a mid-range graphic card. To go along with the Nvidia GeForce GT 540M we'd recommend the Core i5-2410M, which unlike the Core i3 models sports the automatic overclocking feature Turbo Boost and offers the best price-to-performance ratio. Quad-core CPUs or dual-core processors with high clock rates will only start to make a difference when combined with real gaming notebooks or high-end laptops equipped with graphics cards on par with or better than the GeForce GTX 460M or Radeon HD 5870 . This post has been edited by [PF] T.J.: Mar 16 2011, 01:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 24 2011, 02:08 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
^ Not to mention better integrated Intel HD3000 GPU which is more or less on par with Nvidia G310M
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 24 2011, 07:49 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(pandera999 @ May 24 2011, 07:38 PM) eh, HD 3000 more or less equal with g310m?  unbelievable.. Yeap, which is why those SB laptops with AMD HD 6370 etc. are not particularly worth it since there's basically not much performance gain at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 24 2011, 11:55 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(pandera999 @ May 24 2011, 11:53 PM) Intel Core i7 2820QM & Intel Core i7 2920XM whats the different? =.=" QM quad core, xm? XM = "Extreme quad-core mobile processors that feature unlocked Turbo multipliers" Basically even higher clocks and bigger cache http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_BridgeThis post has been edited by [PF] T.J.: May 25 2011, 12:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 28 2011, 12:05 AM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(pandera999 @ May 27 2011, 11:17 PM) heard that i7QM, produce more heat even under load.  Err.... that's inevitable? More powerful = more heat
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 31 2011, 08:17 AM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(pandera999 @ May 31 2011, 12:50 AM) erk... tempt till 65 o'd i fell nervous a lil  even though it consider still "cool". Qm can reach 80+ no learn physic bro  i take bio only last time.  My CPU reaches 95C
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
May 31 2011, 09:45 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
Hi guys, just noticed that the new Pentium B940/950 models are appearing in Malaysian market. Based on the specs, it seems that the B940 is almost exactly similar to the P6200 Only difference is the integrated GPU? In which case its Intel HD3000? Or Intel HD2000? Anyone know? hehe thanks thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PF] T.J.
|
Jun 12 2011, 04:42 PM
|
20k VIP Club
|
QUOTE(skyline100 @ Jun 12 2011, 03:42 PM) huh? i don't see any advantages of core i5 over core i7 to gamers, except the price. Some games do work better on SB i7 compared to SB i5... but not much la at the moment, so i5 would suffice
|
|
|
|
|