Buying Advice Nikon D90 versus Canon 500D discussion thread, which is better?
|
|
 Oct 5 2009, 11:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009  
|
1st: dun nid to open new thread to discuss this, discuss in Canon or any of Nikon thread
2nd: D90 is a higher end model compare to 500D, D90 is more on par with 50D, so it's not a fair fight to compare D90 with 500D This post has been edited by General_Nic: Oct 5 2009, 11:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2009, 12:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(Soony @ Oct 5 2009, 11:38 AM) well, I think its fair to compare these two models.. everything is comparable.... I find no reason not compare these two.. your comment oso quite prove my point anyway, back to ts.. If u want the video function more than picture quality.. 500D is better.. IQ wise nikon D90 is better a bit, i prefer the colour saturation more... deep down inside, D90 has a better ergonomics.. while 500d feels plastic.. TS should go n try out instead of asking blindly over here =) hope this would help ts out..   u cant compare the 2 by video function only in terms of IQ performance off cos D90 better thats y i say is not fair to compare D90 n 500D try comparing 1000D with D3, lol  |
|
|
Oct 5 2009, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(hurm00 @ Oct 5 2009, 02:44 PM) camera dont take pictures lets jz say like this,photographers do. even if u're using damn high tech slr, but if u dont have the talent or feel inside the subject , it will become worthless. canon 500d or d90.. up to u. u should meet those two eye to eye. grab it. feel it. like i said. cameras dont take pictures. they just make it easier, more convenient and adding some spice inside the subject. a good photographer can take nice pics if he/she is using D40 or D3 but now is jz talking about cam specs im trying to justify 500D cos if compare with D90, 500D jz cant fight with D90 in terms of specs but that doesnt mean 500D is not a good camera right? |
|
|
Oct 6 2009, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(atlantis2007 @ Oct 6 2009, 02:58 PM) doesnt matter. 500D sure pawn D90 with its lighter & smaller body =P lol, some ppl do prefer smaller bodies...but i like to hear some ppl say 1000D "pawn" 1D becos 1000D is smaller, lol  |
|
|
Oct 6 2009, 03:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Oct 6 2009, 03:04 PM) i like lighter bodies but not smaller.... so same size but build with lighter material?   maybe is jz me, i feel that Canon bodies r lighter than Nikon not to say lighter means not good... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0152sec
 0.55
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:48 AM |
Quote