Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Yamaha AVR Thread v2.00, Discussions about Yamaha AVR

views
     
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 08:05 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Dickong @ May 8 2015, 10:51 PM)
Any knowledge can find in penang.tq
*
Go to electronic shops, they usually have selling. Go to hi-fi shops you need to prepare extra money, like in electronic shops you can get for rm30, in hi-fi shop for the same thing, rm100-300.
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 08:14 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(silentsunami @ May 8 2015, 04:52 PM)
i saw new one v379 came out d but not sure already in Malaysia or not, v377 roughly how much now? what is the different between yamaha and pionner?
*
Usually I won't bother to get the "latest" model since series the same, end number not same only change in software while hardware majority are still the same.
Even 1 series up also the same sometimes.
For an AVR, what important is the transformer, not the output power as most AVR are sharing the power. When it states 100W, does not means all the channel will be at 100W, it is lesser in real life.
http://my.yamaha.com/en/products/audio-vis...0_&mode=compare
The 377 and 477 basically are using the same power supply and main circuit board(DSP and output), so if I were going for 477, I'll go for 577 instead.

QUOTE(sonerin @ May 8 2015, 09:27 PM)
Generally speaking Yamaha is more neutral and pioneer is more bass heavy
*
Never use Yamaha before(as that time torned between Marantz and Yamaha but Marantz giving good discount, so Marantz for me) but for Pioneer lower end series, completely waste of money laugh.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 12:39 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 10:47 AM)
Yeah is not a bad choice. Is more on the musical side
*
Musical side also not that good for Pioneer.
Again, before I get flamed, I want to point out that only the lower end series of Pioneer is like that, higher end(LX) are better, but again with that price, I can get other brand that can do the saem icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 12:58 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 12:56 PM)
I mean marantz is musical and pioneer is strong bass
*
Marantz are good in musical and have solid bass. That's why after I spent rm2300 for the AVR, I no need to change sub liao.
And to say Pioneer(entry level) strong in bass also not that right, if speaking of flat vs flat on EQ settings.
This is the review I get when I change from VSX-816 to SR5007.
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 02:56 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 01:01 PM)
Is not a fair comparison in your case. The pioneer is a older model and the marantz as new model sure have improve a lot.
*
Don't know on this, usually I'll dig the service manual first laugh.gif
Then will see is there any major change or not. Some even using the same DSP, output board for few years laugh.gif

QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 02:00 PM)
Yamaha is going to come out the x50 series within this 2 months. That is really fast
*
If just changing the naming and internal still using the same, no point also sweat.gif
Like certain models can update the ROM to have atmos, which means it is just using software to change the sound behavior shocking.gif

This post has been edited by supersound: May 9 2015, 02:57 PM
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 03:08 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 03:04 PM)
This might be true but new model sure is backward compatible and older model just cannot do what new model can do. So the x40 series might not be able to do DTS x
*
Yup, you are right on this, that's why sometimes I like to stress is hardware driven or software driven. If hardware driven, then is something can't be changed easily, if using software to tune, then it can be control with our finger icon_rolleyes.gif
Like atmos, 4K or whatever marketing gimmick, when doing the recording, do they put extra mic on top? I doubt so.
This is where a strong DSP chip comes in to play.

This post has been edited by supersound: May 9 2015, 03:08 PM
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 03:18 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 9 2015, 03:17 PM)
atmos require more processing power or good processing chip to decode that way atmos now only have in mid-high end avr
*
AD's Sharc DSP enough or not hmm.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 03:27 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 9 2015, 03:26 PM)
as far as i know only Auro3d require multiple mic in recording,not in atmos even dts x...lol
*
Is it? Anyway, for me, don't keep on chasing our own shadow, not worth at all.
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 03:33 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 9 2015, 03:32 PM)
4 sharc chip-set  in denon atmos avr previous only used 2  icon_idea.gif
*
Need to pay extra liao whistling.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 03:57 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 9 2015, 03:50 PM)
yup that's true,next will be dts x+atmos+auro3d(maybe) in avr and price will be crazier.. tongue.gif
*
Like that better stick back to normal system will do icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 06:54 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ May 9 2015, 04:53 PM)
2000euro doh.gif
I can get better(in terms of price) from it laugh.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 9 2015, 09:38 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(weikee @ May 9 2015, 07:00 PM)
Europe usually higher price. Some item the euro and USD are samebl amount different currency.
*
For rm8-9k, getting a decent 7.2 then getting better speakers would be better.

QUOTE(bad2928 @ May 9 2015, 07:50 PM)
what do you aspect,its a flagship avr
*
Some other brand's mid range level are better than it laugh.gif

QUOTE(sonerin @ May 9 2015, 08:23 PM)
In AVR pioneer is still the leading one in high end no doubt about it
*
Most of the time a review done based on a person's subjective point of view. Like Jeresy Dickson's rubbish talk show I never watch as that jerk are biased to who ever paid him well.
SUSsupersound
post May 10 2015, 01:42 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ May 10 2015, 11:28 AM)
Please share. which models (with multi-ch input, powerful amps, yet cheaper) are better than LX87?? yamaha A3030?
*
Marantz, Denon.
And nope, I won't get A3030 because of its remote.
Had very bad experience with my VSX-816, very easy to fail.
SUSsupersound
post May 10 2015, 02:56 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Dickong @ May 10 2015, 02:12 PM)
For atmos spk can just buy front spk n hang up or not bcos i see not much different between atmos spk n front bookself spk.
*
Keep the atmos behind, by changing the direct of the speaker, you will hear the difference.
Or to make it more work, just use your front speakers as rear speakers and the effect are totally different.
SUSsupersound
post May 10 2015, 08:53 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ May 10 2015, 07:12 PM)
U mean denon 4520 and marantz 7008?
Other than the remote issue, how's a3030?
*
Well, I own Marantz 5007 and say it is value for money that I paid for.
I won't get 7008, but 7007, cheaper.
As for A3030, never personally tested it, but remote with LCD display are not a good idea to begin with.
SUSsupersound
post May 14 2015, 08:00 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(dirtrun @ May 13 2015, 04:46 PM)
Then,

I ll consider 7.2.2 or even 7.4.2 - remember you will need amplification for de xtra channels [ n not all avrs provide it, maybe nxt genre sets might.. ; so need to consider tat too ]
Oso u dont have to go ceiling spkrs ; height/diffuse channels are ATMOS compliant too [ proper ceiling spkrs would need proper dual driver and tis is harder to fix up on a plaster ceiling ; if its me, lll go height/diffuse channels with maybe, satts - it wont be playing all de time anyway.. ]

O ya.. After all is said n done, in a HT.. a decent sub [or 2] has more impact then 4/6/8 ceiling spkrs..

laugh.gif
D
*
SATMOS with ceiling speakers on the front and center will be introduced soon with 17.2, then change the AVR again whistling.gif
SUSsupersound
post May 25 2015, 09:48 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Dickong @ May 25 2015, 08:10 PM)
Normally front n surround setting of spk to big or small will better
*
No right or wrong on this, it depends on the spec of the speakers.
SUSsupersound
post May 31 2015, 11:47 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Dickong @ May 31 2015, 09:30 AM)
If surround wire say 20 meter long per side can any sound degradetion or some lost sound
*
20M? I thought your house is 100M long whistling.gif
For that length, even 18AWG are more than enough.
SUSsupersound
post Jun 10 2015, 07:07 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(K4iz3n @ Jun 10 2015, 06:48 PM)
How are you finding it?
*
For the past ~2 hours, our friend are drunk by the sound bar laugh.gif
SUSsupersound
post Jul 1 2015, 07:25 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ride00 @ Jun 30 2015, 06:27 PM)
Will dump the Yam if it still cannot hold my manual decoder settings ~ then it must be mamaboard failure. Makes me so fed.up n frustrated!

To Desa HT I will go for some auditions...n hope to get at least 12 int.free payment plan.
*
Wait for them to do clear out sales, you may get installment plan without paying 5% of fees.

QUOTE(sonerin @ Jun 30 2015, 10:16 PM)
Never know they have installment plan
*
That's how I got my Marantz 5007 for rm2300 with installment plan thumbup.gif

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0317sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 07:07 AM