Hi guy,
Just want to share some info that i have found regarding the new samsung led tv B8500 series which was recently showcase and u can refer to below detail that i have taken from the net.
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/forum/thre...podcast-samsung - Video showing the new samsung b8500 series led tv
After walking around the Cedia show for a couple days and going back and forth between all the TV manufacturers to see who's hot and who's not this year the Samsung 8500 series was by far the best TV! I am not sure which Blu-ray disk was playing or even what player they were using mainly because I was too blown away by the picture quality to look. The black bars that show in a typical 16:9 movie were more black than the TV's bezel which was the 1st thing I noticed. The color and depth of the picture was amazing. I remember thinking that I needed to get one myself and I rarely do that. None of the other manufacturers gave me that "gotta have it NOW" feeling this year like the Pioneer KURO sets did when they 1st came out. This is the kind of TV that makes you pop in Blu-ray movies you hate just to see how awesome it looks. When I 1st saw the 8500 I noticed that it was still very thin even though it was fully LED back-lit as opposed to the edge lit LED on the 8000 series. The styling was subtle and expensive looking and I am glad they did not incorporate the red touch of color bezel (as some people hate it)
I can not stress how much better this TV is from the other LED models that Samsung offers with edge LED or a traditional cold cathode LCD panel such as the B650 series (although I'm excited about the 65" B650 because of it's size). The local dimming allows for amazing....amazing black reproduction. Toshiba for example had a section in their booth that was very dark with two TV's inside. The TV on the left was their full LED back-lit SV series and on the right they had their ZV series non LED lit set (equivalent to the B650 Sammy for the most part). the color reproduction on both were great and about equal, but the non LED set had so much light leaking out of the supposed "black" scene areas that I couldn't believe the difference.
I went over to the Sony booth next to look at the XBR10 and honestly I was a bit disappointed with the picture quality compared to the 8500 Samsung. It didn't give me a feeling of "wow" at all and the fact that it's edge lit well... don't get me started. I also heard a rumor that Sony purchased their LED's from Samsung this year...If I was Sony I would be a bit scared since Samsung is out selling them by a ton this year.
With all the TV tech floating around from the various manufacturers I was confident that the 8500 was the one...although I do have to say that I was impressed with the LG SL90 set. If I am not mistaken the contrast ratio on the Samsung 8500 series is 7 million to 1 and the LG SL90 is only 3 million to 1 so the Sammy comes out way on top in that respect...granted a lot of other factors play in to the TV beyond contrast as we all know, but I do think that the 8500 may officially be the best TV of 09!
I do have to give some credit where credit is due though to Toshiba who has a nice LED set with local dimming (the SV670) and it is at a great price point.
Lastly...In another forum we were trying to figure out the actual contrast ratio that the human eye can truly see at any given time and compare it to the new TV's. (Maybe some of the calibrators could chime in on this) I was in a Runco training last year and the person doing the training said that the human eye will optimize to a 400 to 1 contrast at any given time even though its overall spectrum is in the millions. I have another person in the Toshiba forum that heard 20,000 to 1 was the max at any given time. With this being said Contrast #'s from the manufacturers seem ridiculous without some frame of reference
Anyone know?
This post has been edited by squall_12: Sep 16 2009, 11:20 AM
Kuro is defeated by samsung new LEDTV?
Sep 16 2009, 11:15 AM, updated 17y ago
Quote


0.0327sec
0.61
5 queries
GZIP Disabled