which brand is gud perfomance for long term use n stability
This post has been edited by atoq: Sep 11 2009, 12:10 AM
Advise : WD vs SEAGATE, SATA HDD
Advise : WD vs SEAGATE, SATA HDD
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:09 AM, updated 17y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: May 2008 |
which brand is gud perfomance for long term use n stability
This post has been edited by atoq: Sep 11 2009, 12:10 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:13 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,714 posts Joined: May 2008 |
both the same... but seagate last time got brick issue.. so I personally think that it is slightly lousier
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:19 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,206 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
WD takes my vote...seagate still has bad records in 7200.12
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:00 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,237 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
WD all the Way!
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:26 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: K-B |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:35 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
82 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
i prefer wd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 02:11 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
both the same but i prefer WD. it's just a matter of luck which HDD will died faster.
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 03:45 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,149 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kuala Terengganu |
really afraid to buy new seagate after the firmware issue.. my vote goes to WD..
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 04:13 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random |
So everybody dislikes Seagate now huh?
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 04:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
prefer WD now.. caviar black..
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 05:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
957 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Land of Jibby Al-Rosmah Ketom |
Huhu one thing bad bout WD is tht are their drives are hot and I do mean it =)But its reliability is unquestionable but depends on luck as well huhu
seagate drives are cooler than WD's but the problem that makes people hate em is becoz of the firmware problems |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 06:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,149 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kuala Terengganu |
QUOTE(asamkipas @ Sep 11 2009, 05:48 AM) Huhu one thing bad bout WD is tht are their drives are hot and I do mean it =)But its reliability is unquestionable but depends on luck as well huhu hehehe, normal la, 1 mistake can ruin and destroy all their reputation.. feel bad bout seagate, but my little bro's pc has old 9 gb seagate, has a leather cover somemore i think hehhe seagate drives are cooler than WD's but the problem that makes people hate em is becoz of the firmware problems |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 08:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,295 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 10:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,591 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
It was the 7200.11 that got bugged and not the 7200.12.
Come on guys, that horse is dead. Just advice people to stay away from 7200.11 firmware. You could try looking at Samsung. They have produced some hard disks that performs much better than WD or Seagates in certain capacities, for a while until WD and Seagate catches up. If performance is important, you should check platter density. Hard disks with 500 GB per platter performs better than those with 333 GB per platter or 250 GB per platter. |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 10:20 AM
|
|
Elite
5,434 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
Why not Samsung and Hitachi?
Hitachi = 3 years warranty 1 to 1 exchange, no need to wait for RMA Samsung = Fast, cool, cheap. |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 10:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,915 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Johor Bahru |
I'm using both SG 7200.12 500GB and WD Green 500GB in my rig. Both are very nice. I use SG as main hdd; WD Green runs very cool and quiet, best for data storage.
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: THE ONE AND ONLY CHOO CHOO TRAIN KINGDOM |
i just bought a 800gb wd recently so my vote goes to wd too.
32mb cache. sata 2 i think. actual size is like 808gb like that. This post has been edited by Deimos Tel`Arin: Sep 11 2009, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 11:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,173 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Definitely WD......got 2 Seagate fail on me alrwady, one Momentus and the other one is 2.1GB Medalist.......
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 11:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL. |
Honestly any brand will do fine except the problematic models imho. WD and Seagate both have failed me before also but some are still in service until now. TS, looking for what size? 1TB, samsung is worth looking into it as well.
1TB pricing Seagate 7200.12 RM292, Samsung F1 RM285, WD Green RM295 and Black RM345. All 3yrs warranty except Black 5yrs. i think 7200.12/F1/Black are same category as performance drive |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 11:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,820 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
Wd 1TB caviar green died on my twice within 4 months. so sent back for warranty claim and at the mean time bought a 1tb caviar black for replacement.
but my 2 caviar green 640Gbs are running fine. |
| Change to: | 0.0212sec
0.51
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:01 PM |