Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V31!, The Orange Legion

views
     
craziqbal
post Sep 11 2009, 01:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(vcxv @ Sep 11 2009, 01:10 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
how did you get these photos to look so clean??

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Sep 11 2009, 01:51 AM
craziqbal
post Sep 11 2009, 03:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


I don't quite understand..for the 2nd photo, he set the exposure bias to 1.0, in the third one, because there was a lot of white, so the noise wasn't visible ka??

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Sep 11 2009, 03:09 AM
craziqbal
post Sep 12 2009, 04:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(noprob @ Sep 12 2009, 03:09 PM)
Yupp , hmm Y ?
*
I think he meant WHERE did you take this photo?

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Sep 12 2009, 04:58 PM
craziqbal
post Sep 15 2009, 02:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


woots, a friend of mine is on his way to Studio Zaloon to grab the last A200 set now.. Ted Adnan and myself recommended the A200, and after he compared with other brands, he decided to go the Sony way..
craziqbal
post Sep 17 2009, 08:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Hinika @ Sep 17 2009, 05:18 PM)
guess nid some advice, looking for a walk-around lens to replace my sal18-70 kit lens, travel a lot but i doesnt wan to carry many lens with me, with my a300 and another sal55200 kit lens (or not)

took some landscape, portrait, indoor, products shoot normally,
mostly people with clear background or some bokeh shot ... biggrin.gif

there a few lens in my minds currently,

-Tamron 17-50mm F2.8
-SAL 16-105mm
-Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 Macro DC

or CZ 16-80mm directly ? o.O
*
For me personally (had the same dilemma earlier this year whistling.gif )
1st choice definitely CZ 16-80 (sharpness, IQ, colour, range) icon_idea.gif thumbup.gif Price not so nice sad.gif

2nd choice Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 Macro DC (damn interesting lens, nice range, 20cm MFD, macro magnification 1:2.3@70mm, sharpness also okay). to me offers most value for my money. Eventually I went with this lens icon_idea.gif blush.gif But this is one lens that is very hard to sell 2nd hand sad.gif

3rd choice tied Tamron and SAL16105. Tamron is sharper than the sigma, constant aperture, range not so nice (again, a personal observation). I personally love the SAL16105's range, it's simply awesome!

Some people might not agree with me. blink.gif The choice ultimately is up to you, we give you the information to enable you to make an informed decision. Cheers! icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Sep 17 2009, 08:16 PM
craziqbal
post Sep 28 2009, 02:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


guys, the ultimate in sports photography.. this friday and saturday.. siapa ada berani? flex.gif http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/art...icle/index_html

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Sep 28 2009, 02:33 PM
craziqbal
post Oct 1 2009, 07:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Oct 1 2009, 06:53 PM)
Nahhh I cant survive with my kitlens starting from 24mm. 28mm lagi teruk. LOL. Was thinking Sigma 17-70. Right craziqbal? (:
*
yeah!! nod.gif rclxms.gif

is bryanlyt still selling his? i think he's letting go at rm1200.

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Oct 1 2009, 07:01 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 03:31 AM