Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Xbox360 Holding Back Playstation 3 Development May, What do you think?

views
     
TSeleshoe
post Sep 4 2009, 03:57 PM, updated 17y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by eleshoe: Sep 4 2009, 03:58 PM
vorchiel
post Sep 4 2009, 03:58 PM

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
****
Senior Member
666 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Left Hand Society, West London
same like ps3 holding back gta4
nwk
post Sep 4 2009, 04:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Britannia
QUOTE(eleshoe @ Sep 4 2009, 03:57 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
oh really? try telling that to 1st party developers like Naughty Dog and they will tell you to shove that crapbox up your candya$$!!!!!!!

This post has been edited by nwk: Sep 4 2009, 04:05 PM
evoHahn
post Sep 4 2009, 04:09 PM

Mika !
******
Senior Member
1,711 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Gran Turismo Defence Force



lame.
neoardi
post Sep 4 2009, 04:11 PM

Membanteras Pembenci
****
Senior Member
645 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: The future


So it's confirmed that FF13 on X360 will come in 4 DVD discs? hmm.gif
gundamalpha
post Sep 4 2009, 04:13 PM

☆彡TITS☆彡
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KK


"Hi-Def standard blu-ray."

I stopped there.. a person who doesn't know the difference between media & resolution is laughable
Thrust
post Sep 4 2009, 04:14 PM

Power To The People!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,761 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


I personally feels that the PS3 has just a little more horsepower to spare if compared to the 360. No doubt the CELL BE is technically much more superior to the 360 CPU but the PS3 RSX graphics is somewhat equivalent to the 360's ATI XENO.

So in term of eye candy, these 2 system are quite the same.
colt_508
post Sep 4 2009, 04:15 PM

Baru masuk darjah satu (^_^)Y
*******
Senior Member
8,194 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Atas Pokok Jati



i'll buy an Ori FFXIII 4 DVD dics set rclxm9.gif
ESLord
post Sep 4 2009, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Tharsis Depot


tl;dr
earthdome
post Sep 4 2009, 04:35 PM

kato rosa
*****
Senior Member
715 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
oh,,it's that hiphopgamer show..lol
pelvin
post Sep 4 2009, 05:19 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
521 posts

Joined: May 2006


actually both consoles are the same la.. i don't see any huge graphic quality on ps3 vs the xbox.. Both of them are totally looks the same. I own 2 consoles btw. So that i don't miss out exclusive titles. haha

I was expecting huge quality difference of BluRay games compare with DVD. So far all the games i played, BOTH XBOX and PS3 QUALITY ARE THE SAME! Both also i played on 1080P. So conclusion is, personally i feel those fanboy who criticize about each other are bias.. haha

Now im thinking, why should i buy BR games, when else i can get it on 1 DVD which cost cheaper rite? unless games like FF13 of cos its more worth to buy BR.
Zaryl
post Sep 4 2009, 05:20 PM

Hardcore Casual Gamer
******
Senior Member
1,711 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kedah Khap Khoun Khap (4K)



I beg your pardon but what's tl;dr?
Darkstalker
post Sep 4 2009, 05:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Are the differences between hardware just affecting graphic quality only?

I mean, okay, BluRay discs can hold a LOT more info in one go, which means it should be able to hold a lot more information uncompressed (textures, sound clips, etc) which should translate into better loading speeds.

Note that the above paragraph is just a theory. I don't know whether it works out like that in real life.

What other differences are there from a technical standpoint?
pelvin
post Sep 4 2009, 05:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
521 posts

Joined: May 2006


maybe ps3 will load abit faster la and less risk of having hardware problem (which i feel it depends on your luck. i use my xbox 3 years+ till today still kicking).. and more functions like watching bluray and stuff.. but Gaming graphic and texture wise, NO DIFFERENCE! what ps3 can do Xbox oso can do at a cheaper price! for me, I will buy Xbox games if that game are multiplatform. I will buy PS3 games, if its exclusive like mgs4, gow3 games like that... i rather be a smart consumer then a fanboy..

This post has been edited by pelvin: Sep 4 2009, 05:37 PM
samurai20
post Sep 4 2009, 08:23 PM

~~HMMMM~~
******
Senior Member
1,441 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(pelvin @ Sep 4 2009, 05:35 PM)
maybe ps3 will load abit faster la and less risk of having hardware problem (which i feel it  depends on your luck. i use my xbox 3 years+ till today still kicking).. and more functions like watching bluray and stuff.. but Gaming graphic and texture wise, NO DIFFERENCE! what ps3 can do Xbox oso can do at a cheaper price! for me, I will buy Xbox games if that game are multiplatform. I will buy PS3 games, if its exclusive like mgs4, gow3 games like that... i rather be a smart consumer then a fanboy..
*
+11111111.... thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

that why be a gamer not FANBOYAN... laugh.gif...
gnsumas
post Sep 4 2009, 08:39 PM

/k/+ps=WIN!
*****
Senior Member
736 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Hell



QUOTE(Thrust @ Sep 4 2009, 04:14 PM)
I personally feels that the PS3 has just a little more horsepower to spare if compared to the 360. No doubt the CELL BE is technically  much more superior to the 360 CPU but the PS3 RSX graphics is somewhat equivalent to the 360's ATI XENO.

So in term of eye candy, these 2 system are quite the same.
*
Actually, there were several sites that proved that the XENO renders objects faster than the RSX.

However, PS3 devs can push the bulk of the workload onto the Cell and let the RSX do nothing but render, while the XENO has to do some other work while rendering at the same time. So the amount of eye candy is probably mainly towards how much the dev want to give to the Cell and how much to give the RSX.

It has been proven that if used correctly, the PS3's architecture does have noticeably superior hardware, but third-party devs haven't shown much in this area. Most (the hardcore PS3-hating type) Xbots already claim that the 360 can run a game as advanced as Killzone 2. It may be true, but I doubt the 360 can run a game as graphically demanding as Killzone 2 without taking out it's awesome ragdoll physics. Even Crysis doesn't have comparable ragdolling.


QUOTE(samurai20 @ Sep 4 2009, 08:23 PM)
+11111111.... thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif

that why be a gamer not FANBOYAN... laugh.gif...
*
Funstation podewin! thumbup.gif
TSeleshoe
post Sep 5 2009, 01:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


For sure there is different in terms of graphics quality between PS3 and 360, just my little opinion.

For games which exists for both PS3 and 360, the developer for sure will provide the same (or at least the same) quality for both, they will not want either of the company say things like "Why you make better graphics for them but not for us!", so they will make identical experience for both consoles to avioid "not balance".

In other hand, exclusive games are different, take example Uncharted 2, this game is only specially make for PS3 (who doesn't know that), and the development are all focus on the power of Cell and make fully use of it's power, and dun forget also the bluray disc can hold much more data thus more detail.

And i believe i saw some news saying that the kind of quality in Uncharted 2 is not possible in 360.

That's why in my opinion, in terms of hardware, PS3 has advantage over 360 and because of this, if all game developers really want to make full use of the power of the Cell and bluray, better quality will be seen in PS3.

This post has been edited by eleshoe: Sep 5 2009, 01:45 PM
prazole
post Sep 5 2009, 10:51 PM

Sleepyhead..
******
Senior Member
1,513 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Kuching - Klang



lets not forget xbox360 came out 1 year before ps3

1 year different of technology...

S4PH
post Sep 6 2009, 12:52 AM

adam_s4ph
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: ..Tsukuba..


nowadays its not about power its about which console sells games well id say currently now its xbox360 era, PS3 isnt king even if the hardware is powerfull, What happen to the previous xbox had so much raw power compared to the ps2 still it died coz not many developers supporting the hardware, brute power is nt enuf if there is no softwares to utilize it.
Mgsrulz
post Sep 6 2009, 02:29 AM

30 years of Metal Gear
********
All Stars
14,258 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


QUOTE(Zaryl @ Sep 4 2009, 05:20 PM)
I beg your pardon but what's tl;dr?
*
Literally, "Too long; didn't read"

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.56    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:49 PM