Nikon D90 v4, First DSLR with HD video recording
|
|
 Sep 7 2009, 05:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004  
|
herrooo. been abit since i last came here.
spam:       Added on September 7, 2009, 5:53 am QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Sep 6 2009, 10:16 AM) Dum dee dum ... browsing ... browsing ... browsing ... surfing ... surfing ... surfing ... that looks like a transformer lolthen saw this    p/s - You can forget about 11 frame per second oledi. This is 30 frames per second.   This post has been edited by luzzio: Sep 7 2009, 05:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2009, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
thanks! Nope... no filters... can't afford those yet.
I'm a heavy lightroom user, so I just shoot in raw and work on my composition. Once I think I can handle that instinctively, i'll try not to rely on LR and get it right without PPing |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 06:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
here's some food for thought. halfway through my holiday i got sick of taking photos and looking through a lens, and decided to leave the camera in the hotel room for the rest of the trip, and enjoying the sights with my own eyes.
=p i hope none of us here take DSLR's with us if we ever go on a holiday with our partners. just saying. |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 09:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
^ that is exactly how I decided to enjoy my trip for the rest of it.
Ok i'll stop with the photography philosophy here =p This post has been edited by luzzio: Sep 11 2009, 09:42 AM |
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 10:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
That's my point. i was obsessed and forgot how to simply enjoy sights. everything i saw... i tried hard to figure out angles, composition... it got exhausting.
I agree that it's all in moderation. Just saying. |
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 07:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
 Some curve tweaking applied, a small but slightly visible vignetting added for emphasis. This post has been edited by luzzio: Sep 14 2009, 07:08 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2009, 05:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
if im not mistaken, the d90 and d3000 have the same sensor so image quality shouldn't be any different. I've held the d3000 and it's tiny, with less controls. u get what u pay for.
yes, buying a cheaper body will give ur lens budget more breathing room. lenses do make alot of difference anyway, more so than the body most of the time. its all about priorities. but if u want to keep your body for a long time and improve our gear bsed on lenses, then i'd suggest splurging that 1k more for a d90 instead of a d3000. |
|
|
Sep 16 2009, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Sep 16 2009, 09:38 AM) Nope. The D3000 is using same sensor as the D60. It is a CCD sensor. The D5000 has the same sensor as the D90 which is CMOS. I think the newer CMOS sensor is the one that has very low noise at high ISOs. Yup, if you can afford it, get the D90. The D5000 is nice but you have this recall problem. You don't know whether all the new D5000 out there have are from the good batch. Nikon is not transparent about bad batch serial numbers. ah... am I mistaking this for the D5000? My bad =pIf you're gonna buy a few lenses in the future, better go for D90 as well as it has the in body motor. Then get the D series lenses. Image quality is same or better than the AF-S/G lenses except you don't have the SWM motor. |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 08:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 26 2009, 10:11 PM) RTFM !! tense.If you know nothing, just STFU  RTFM !! RTFM !! |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 05:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
i'm lusting after a 35mm prime.
sigh. Added on September 28, 2009, 5:54 am QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Sep 28 2009, 02:36 AM) Ya, I got D90!! try the video! shutter count not sure, less than 30 I think Definitely much better than D60 in term of handiling and speed However the full functionality and the 'best' are yet to be discovere le just got it, not much chance to use till now the jelly-effect when you're panning sucks but you'll have lotsa fun with it nonetheless This post has been edited by luzzio: Sep 28 2009, 05:58 AM |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 04:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
teh tarik.
though i think tech talk is more approp. |
|
|
Oct 1 2009, 05:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
still studying (if anyone's curious)
haven't gone out to take pictures recently so here's the latest picture i took haha  This post has been edited by luzzio: Oct 1 2009, 06:05 AM |
|
|
Oct 7 2009, 10:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Oct 7 2009, 01:11 AM) i wud kaw kaw deny that sony is nice ahahah never like sony au contraire! Sony makes very aesthetically pleasing products. The T-Series laptop line makes the geek in me gush when I see it in the wild. They really know how to design, both visually and ergonomically. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2009, 02:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
The new tamron makes me feel outdated
 today's spam » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Oct 12 2009, 12:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Oct 12 2009, 11:51 AM) wht lens?? love the 1st pic bokeh...not too bokeh feeling i suppose if you're referring to what tamron lens, the new 17-50 VC from tamron la! =p spooky..nice lighting..lol.. if you're asking what I shot with... both on 50mm primes. |
|
|
Oct 13 2009, 02:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
toured europe about a month ago. in a whole week i only had to recharge once. this camera's a battery sipper.
|
|
|
Oct 13 2009, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Oct 12 2009, 09:32 PM) i am thinknig of getting a tokina 11-16 too , but i am not a fan of third party brands and my heart tells me to get the nikon 12-24...i need to try both first. Time and time again, dslr magazine reviews have shown that third party lenses tend to do better optically, with house brands being better at focus speed (usually) and build quality.and cheaper too. just thought i'd add that in. |
|
|
Oct 15 2009, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
QUOTE(delasques @ Oct 14 2009, 11:00 PM) Do u guys know how much is the new nikkor 50mm f1.4 price in the Malaysia market..is it worth it..can someone explain to me what's the diff btwn f1.4 & 1.8.? Which of the two is well recommended? http://www.popphoto.com/Features/The-50mm-...-s-Magic-BulletI have used both. If you get the 1.4 it usually comes with a Silent Wave Motor for smoother focusing. The f/1.4 is 2/3 a stop higher than the 1.8, and can be very much faster (at 1.4, you only need one third of the shutter length by the 1.8 for the same exposure). And of course, more bokeh =p But 1.4's come at a high price... about 1k. compared to the rm400 for a 1.8. Purely my opinion. This post has been edited by luzzio: Oct 15 2009, 12:09 AM |
|
|
Oct 15 2009, 01:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
ah... thanks for that. I stand corrected.
|
|
|
Oct 16 2009, 02:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Junior Member
376 posts Joined: Sep 2004
|
my wish list is a 28mm, 35mm and 90mm prime. sigh.
 This post has been edited by luzzio: Oct 16 2009, 05:14 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0547sec
 0.56
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 05:35 PM |
Quote
