So sad no one comment on my pix anymore.
Photography [PIC-A-Day Thread] Post your daily shots here! V4!, A Pictar A Day Keeps Da Fungus Away! XD
Photography [PIC-A-Day Thread] Post your daily shots here! V4!, A Pictar A Day Keeps Da Fungus Away! XD
|
|
Jan 22 2010, 01:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
So sad no one comment on my pix anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2010, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2010, 02:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2010, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(cik_tak @ Jan 23 2010, 11:37 AM) this pics was from my wed shot recently .. pls c & c I think this could be frame more towards the center of the image. The curtains/window are too blown out, and your subject is framed too much by the side, it makes me wonder what are you trying to show, the subject, or the window/curtains.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Camera : Nikon Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/640) Aperture: f/2.8 Focal Length: 17 mm ISO Speed: 800 If you can clone off the dirt on the wall, and the stray strands of her hair, it would be a perfect capture ! QUOTE(kyosho @ Jan 23 2010, 04:25 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « My little contribution D90 + 18-105mm kit lens Exp:1/400 f/5.6 QUOTE(guest18 @ Jan 23 2010, 08:13 PM) canon d30 with 50mm f1.8 Brother, Canon mana ada D30?f4 1/160 sec iso : 100 my light meter say correctly exposed but on my screen it look dark well I believe can photoshop to make it brighter Are you on matrix? Usually that's why they metering shows that way, because the overall picture is well exposed (you have a bright background) QUOTE(zahidee @ Jan 24 2010, 12:09 AM) Mind posting the exif?This post has been edited by Utada: Jan 24 2010, 12:21 AM |
|
|
Jan 24 2010, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
WHOA! That's a very old camera. Doubt it's your monitor because on my screen the subject looks about 1/4 stop too under exposed.
|
|
|
Jan 24 2010, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
What happen to the 1 picture with EXIF per post ? Not following anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2010, 11:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jan 24 2010, 08:03 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ISO Speed Ratings = 800 Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/640 second Aperture = ƒ/1.8 Focal Length =50 mm -The noise and colour are intended to create the old kopitiam feel. QUOTE(chuppy2 @ Jan 24 2010, 10:56 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Camera: Nikon Exposure: 0.003 sec (1/400) Aperture: f/3.5 Focal Length: 90 mm ISO Speed: 400 Exposure Bias: 0 EV Flash: No Flash The sharpness may not be there, But i love the composition and the effect the flappign wings of the butterfly created.. Probably over-saturated LOL. It's not sharp because your F too big. I like the colors. Drew QUOTE(aLittleMisfit @ Jan 24 2010, 11:25 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « a bit nostalgic feel Canon 1000d Exposure: 2 sec Aperture: f/5 ISO Speed: 200 Added on January 25, 2010, 12:02 am QUOTE(achew @ Jan 24 2010, 11:53 PM) Got some ghosting here and there, too much sharpening?This post has been edited by Utada: Jan 25 2010, 12:02 AM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 03:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jan 25 2010, 01:27 AM) Actually I just noticed that and I have no idea. Reflection from something... I think should be the reflection from knife and fork... Added on January 25, 2010, 1:44 amDon't mind I add in few more shots? I think I need to learn how to reduce distractions. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ISO Speed Ratings = 100 Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/2500 Aperture = ƒ/3.5 Focal Length = 18 mm QUOTE(samurai1337 @ Jan 25 2010, 03:18 AM) My first post in this thread. Something minimalistic to begin with I think there is too much ground. Else I think it is a great picture.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF-1, 14-45mm Kit lens ISO400, f/5.6, Exposure 1/8s, focal length 41mm Software: SilkyPix DS 3.0 |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 03:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
WOHHH BOY. Did I miss something?
Actually, if I don't feel like sharing my settings, then I rather not pose. Sure lights and the other variables change in each exposure (especially with arses around shitting everywhere) then again, if that's your so called trade secret, then don't post it up on a thread that is meant for sharing. In fact, open yourself a new thread, put a catchy title, like "My trade secret" or something. Try to garner some supporters, perhaps with that, you can have people whoao .. or naaaaiiseee on your photos. Heck, get your pictures published, nat geo? no problem ma, right? Heck, even nat geo people share their settings. Guess you must be more pro then them. Can fly to the moon or not? |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 03:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jan 25 2010, 11:32 PM) When you have 600mm, and birds, you would wish that you have something smaller. Me and hubby just got back from Japan, 2 days and we filled up more than 1TB of pictures. We were not gruesome enough to delete the 'bad' shots because most of the shots were pretty damn good. Check his flick, I think he will be posting them soon.QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 27 2010, 03:17 PM) whoa .. you flew to the moon. Got make roti canai or not? How do you toss it when it won't come back down after? |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 04:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
![]() Sarcasm is sweet, especially when the other party could not digest it. F/8 ISO3200 1/50 |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Guest18: Purposely one. Neh like this
![]() ISO3200 f/5.6 1/50 |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 05:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(aLittleMisfit @ Jan 27 2010, 05:04 PM) yup yup agree, but that pic is a failed one. Just wanna show Guest18 the kinda effect that I wanted to do. that pic is hubby's one. He see leng lui leg becum tofu, press shutter also cannot press. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 11:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(achew @ Jan 27 2010, 08:01 PM) bro u r wrong(or sis just in case its the wify using=p)..nat geo guys share their exif..bcoz their trade secrets r their compo..their ideas..their skill sets which could not be imitated by simply following the setting in exif...but sometimes i feel that some photographers here...their best valuable asset is their camera/gears...if the exif is "leaked"..other forumers simply copy the setting..they might be getting same if not better picture...how u do expect people share that?? Haih!! You are wrong already.maybe my lcd isnt calibrated..i feel that the shot can be slightly brighter..and gosh..i love ur description there ^^ You see, we share cameras, share food, share our kid, share the bed but never never never never ever ever we share our LYN account. Just like how Ne-Yo would say. ![]() ISO 3200 f/8 1/200 People don't share because they are afraid. 67 million people in the world, you are not the only person who can take such picture just because a little information is 'leaked'. I feel that the picture is okay, 1/4 under. Night time already ma, view things also must 1/4 stop down. Added on January 27, 2010, 11:27 pm QUOTE(lwliam @ Jan 27 2010, 10:07 PM) One of your shots that you shot with hubby is in The Star news paper. Twitter him for the exact info la.This post has been edited by Utada: Jan 27 2010, 11:27 PM |
|
|
Jan 30 2010, 09:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Why the models got no leg one ?
|
|
|
Jan 30 2010, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Old shot, but works also la hor?
![]() F/11 ISO 200 1/100 600mm + 2x tele-converter. This post has been edited by Utada: Jan 30 2010, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 02:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2010, 03:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Sheep319 @ Feb 6 2010, 02:28 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Sony a300 50 mm f/2.8 1/4 sec ISO 100 This cat got lost in the basement of one of the shopping complexes in Miri. (i think) Not Basement 1, but Basement 2! but where is yoour focus point la? looks a bit OOF. |
|
|
Feb 6 2010, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(DEVICLOT @ Feb 4 2010, 05:59 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Camera: Canon EOS 400D Digital Exposure: 0.003 sec (1/320) Aperture: f/5.6 Focal Length: 214 mm ISO Speed: 200 QUOTE(zorex @ Feb 6 2010, 06:28 PM) She look too pale, like making up for a ghost movie like that. If W/B warmer, would be good! |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0483sec
1.00
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:36 PM |