Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science is it possible make a smaller joule to create, a bigger joule?

views
     
mumeichan
post Oct 1 2009, 07:09 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
Many of you here are laughing your ass off at the TS question and giving him a big NO. I think you all are still stuck wil elementary physics.

Of course you all know the that according to the first law of thermodynamics, the quantity of energy in the whole universe is constant. No matter how the form of energy changes, the total amount when measured in joules is the same.

However, there have been a few phenomenas that seem to violate the first law of termodynamics. I can't remember those phenomenas anymore but I did have a discussion about it with a friend in uni before. Of course, until now we don't understand the phenomena yet nor are we able to replicate it. But in the future maybe the first law of termodynamics will be proven wrong. Scientist are interested in these phenomenas as if we can reproduce them it would mean an infinite source of energy.
mumeichan
post Oct 1 2009, 07:31 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Eventless @ Oct 1 2009, 09:38 AM)
Unless you can specify these phenomenons, your entire post is equivalent to one of those stories that you hear from a friend's uncle's relative. It is not relevant since it practically says nothing.

It is not scientific since you say that it cannot be replicated. Look at cold fusion, an experiment that could not be replicated successfully. If you can't cause a phenomenon to occurs in a reliable and measurable manner, good luck in having your hypothesis accepted by the scientific community.

Scientific laws will always change when a better one is found. You just have to prove it scientifically for that to happen.
*
LOL. It's people like the TS who wonder about these 'impossibles' and do years of research to better understand our universe. When curiosity if met with such negative attitude, it only hampers scientific development.

Obvious those phenomenons that I am talking about having been scientifically proved yet. It may be just some hocus pocus after all. But it has been claimed to be observed and people taken note about it. Btw, it's not some friend's uncle's relative stuff k, it's stuff that professors in good universities are looking at. It's just too bad I can't remember what is it. If anyone's interested you can search for them online yourself and if anyone wants to think I'm all words, doesn't really matter either.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 04:21 PM