In this post, I can only say that, by so far, there are four physical parameters known to be conserved.
1. Energy
2. electric charge
3. Angular momentum(Include linear momentum)
4. mass

Using this four principle, you will know that you are not likely to get bigger joule from smaller joule. In fact, second law of thermodynamics is one of the law that prohibit such incident.

As for the concept of the so called "asian mentality", i can only say, even western country people also take their times to develop themselves. As for slow development of scientific knowledge in asian country, i can say it is the society interest and political interest in Asian country is different from Europe. It is the environment which eventually lead to such great difference. However, by hard working, more deep in thinking and do more research on whatever observed, one day, all human will eventually no longer differentiate each other using mentality.

As for japanese robotics, i can only say, robotics is not a precise measurement of mentality level. Country such as China, Korean and India may also eventually play a role in such field. Real technology that human need is come up with something that harm the earth less and also explore to outer space. There is still a lot theory need to be studied and improved.

I can only say, the more we learn and understand, the more we dont judge people by mentality. There are always some reason for some one to become like what you see. If one feel the other one is low in mentality, he/she should provide more help and lead the person to the right direction then just simply give a comment.

This post has been edited by VA1701wb: Sep 12 2009, 10:18 AM

Transformer is simply a device that transform voltage by means of magnetic field induction. When a high voltage is produce from low voltage, it is equivalent to reduction of current so as to comply with the facts that energy is always conserved. In reality, energy seems not conserved or loss because there is always a leakage path for an energy to escape/leave of the system. As for transformer is concerned, losses due to leakage of magnetic field and also due to the winding resistance.

As for make a smaller joule to create, a bigger joule, it can only be achieve as long as the principle of energy conservation is obeyed. For example, those solar water heater manage to use less electric energy to heat up more water by absorbing heat from the sun and also environment. The only possible way to get smaller joule to create bigger joule is to absorb stray energy in the ambient, including widely known wireless energy.

I thought i have write very clear that energy in overall has yet to be conversed according to the law. My example of creating bigger joule from smaller joule is just an illustration how he use less electrical energy to get more thermal heat throught absorbtion of heat from ambient. In fact, there is no statement in "make a smaller joule to create, a bigger joule" says that no external energy can be absorb. Therefore i can only say if the system manage to absorb energy from embient, then there will be an illusion that some one use smaller joule to get bigger joule. However, the additional joule is the amount of heat absorb from environment.
I just hope some one when read a statement, be more critical. Most importantly, be more creative, not just simply reject some idea base on common sense.

I thought that my statement is very clear that "energy in overall has yet to be conserved according to the law". Did i say energy absorb from environment is not counted in? I only mean that one can use some energy and add some energy from other sources to get more energy. The statement is written so clear and yet still got ppl want to forget what i had writen and simply comment on part of a statements....

The idea is like if i use a 1kW electric heater to cook water, my water heat content increase at rate of 1kW. If i use a 1kW heat pump, one can get 1kW plus extra heat(which may be around 3kW) which absorb from environment. For an end user, he/she only see the effect, one system produce 1kW of heat using 1kW of electric while another produce perhaps 3.0kW(for example) of heat using 1kW of electric. They see this effect because they are the one who pay for the electric bill by heating their water. It is clear that they can heat up more water for the same amount of electric bills by using an heat pump. Most importantly, they are not charged for stealing heat from the environment.

As for people who know the underlying theory such as Kekacang,Eventless, those who have good foundation on Physics and me , we know that the additional heat is absorb from environment. Most importantly, we know this facts because energy must always conserved in a close system(or energy cannot be simply created and destroyed, can only change from one form to another form). But For those who dont know the theory, they get an illusion that they got bigger joule out of smaller joule(because they pay less $$).

Another example is like Microsoft Windows operating system(OS), claiming it is multitasking. By theory, multitasking OS means that the operating sytsem running several task at a instance, which is something like parallel computing system use in supercomputer. Then, it reality, Windows is still a "singletasking" OS for the reason that there is only one processing unit running at one time(especially during the time when no multicore processor is in market). The end user see multitasking effect because Windows OS perform "time slicing", to allow each task have opportunity to run within a time frame. Windows OS give an illusion of multitasking to end user while for professional people will know what is happening inside.

Finally, "Creativity" is build on the criterion where fundamental truth to be obeyed by all means. I would also like to provide a link for those who interested on the work for those inventor who attempt to get more joule out of less joule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion

One of the most important concept for those who study deep in theory is that no matter how complete a theory is, the theory is still not complete. Please refer to the following link to understand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del...teness_theorems


This post has been edited by VA1701wb: Sep 16 2009, 03:42 AM