Recommendation on LCD TV (FullHD), or Plasma TV?..
|
|
 Aug 23 2009, 04:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006 
|
QUOTE(pgf501 @ Aug 23 2009, 08:22 AM) or Panasonic Plasma P42X10K. much cheaper acterly not so much cheaper.. I think only 250-300 difference.. for that amount, you are getting 1million lesser pixel (between 1366x768 and 1920x1080).. which I think not so good bargain..  |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(rx330 @ Aug 23 2009, 05:07 PM) tat panny only 1024 X 768 Oh its not even 768p for x10? Then overpriced lor usa selling around rm1.9k |
|
|
Aug 25 2009, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(funnyTONE @ Aug 25 2009, 02:44 PM) Very true. Funny thing is, plasma owners will definitely list out the pros in plasma while lcd owners will list out the good side of lcds. his view point is very valid wan.., he's mr TV calibrator.. people got golden ears for hi fi, he got golden eyes! Before I purchased my samsung lcd, I'm the over-the-fence spectator. Now that I've chosen a side, I guess my opinion is just as biased as the guy above me.  Its best to decide on your own....the rest of us are just sharing our 2 cent opinion on the matter.  |
|
|
Aug 26 2009, 06:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(funnyTONE @ Aug 26 2009, 07:12 AM) For the moment, most of us are grateful that we can enjoy our tv screen with better luxury...one that we're previously exclusive for the rich only. Now that I'm a LCD owner, I'm always eyeballing plasma screens with envy. I'm sure it works both ways on the other side. infact the LCD goes into the guest room.. as spare.. |
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(azbro @ Aug 28 2009, 11:15 AM) My advice...trust me bro. get the Panny TH-P42S10K. I like your tenacity and drive.. |
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(Lone*Wolf @ Aug 28 2009, 11:24 AM) Confidently promoting Plasma on a LCD territory we vote with our wallets, via our purchases ..  This post has been edited by ar188: Aug 28 2009, 12:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2009, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(azbro @ Sep 2 2009, 09:23 AM) Between the X10 and S10 bang for bucks is the S10 (FullHD) X top range?. Regarding the Panasonic Models for 42inch, got so many I also dunno what is what....anyway here is goes...I might be mistaken. Latest ones are group as G,S,X and C. 42PY700H: Used to be top of the range (FHD) P42G10K: Current top of the range (FHD) P42S10K: Great features (FHD) 42LZ80MK: LCD model (FHD) P42X10K: Top of the range for HD (HD) P42C10K: Budget model(HD) 42PV80H: Older model (HD) How abt 800 and 850 for 50inches ar? This post has been edited by ar188: Sep 2 2009, 12:09 PM |
|
|
Sep 2 2009, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(low98944 @ Sep 2 2009, 01:35 PM) The main difference is resolution. But first, you should consider what type of movie/TV you want to watch in the first place. in the past that's quite true when HD and FHD is around double the price.. For example, if your new Plasma is mainly for watching Astro and play DVD, then HD ready is sufficient to meet your need and no need to purchase FullHD Plasma. but nowadays, no need to consider the lesser model when it's only 300-400 diff between the X10 and S10.. would you pay 10-15% less for something that gives you 62% or 1.3million pixels less?? also similar spec FHD panny in US is around the same as our S10 pricing, while X10 equivalent in US is selling below RM2k.. |
|
|
Sep 2 2009, 02:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(azbro @ Sep 2 2009, 02:00 PM) X is top range for HDlah....not FHD in order for it to be top HD (not FHD) shouldn't it at least be 1366x768 rez? |
|
|
Sep 2 2009, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(low98944 @ Sep 2 2009, 02:39 PM) In simple term, you will only notice the difference between 1080p and 1080i when watching fast moving objects in movie. Where as DTS etc is Audio format. Currently most BDs are either Dolby True HD, dts HD Master Audio or PCM etc as their main audio output. All these three are lossless format. But if you want to enjoy those format of audio you need to spend some more (quite be huge) in hardware.   |
| Change to: |  0.0215sec
 0.68
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 10:45 PM |
Quote