Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science NASA successfully test trash can size nuke reactor, for future moon bases.

views
     
SUSMark_Renton
post Aug 19 2009, 02:13 PM, updated 17y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching
it's a start eh? when i was a wee lad i remember watching Beyond 2000 and they say we will be colonising the moon by 2010.. yeah right! they cant even secure funding for the ISS... but anyway glad to see they are at least trying to make my childhood space dream a reality!

QUOTE
NASA Successfully Tests Nuclear Reactor to Power Future Moon Bases

By Adrian Covert
Posted 08.18.2009 at 12:30 pm

user posted image
Gone Fission : See it bigger. John MacNeil

For a while now, NASA has been planning to use a nuclear fission reactor to power future bases on the Moon and Mars. They have now finally begun testing a Stirling engine-based system, subjecting it to simulated extraterrestrial conditions to examine how it would fare as a lunar power generator.

The fission reactor uses a sodium-potassium liquid metal mixture to transfer heat to a Stirling engine, which then uses gas pressure for electricity conversion. Testing has been successful so far, as researchers have been able to generate a constant 2.3 kilowatts of power from the engine, using a non-nuclear heat source. With the full nuclear reactor running, their goal is to produce 40 kilowatts of power.


To simulate real space conditions, NASA has tested the motor in conditions of high radiation (20 times greater than normal), to make sure the parts don't break down when exposed to nuclear materials. They've also tested the lightweight radiator panel in a vacuum chamber to make sure it can handle the lack of atmosphere on the moon, as well as the extreme temperatures of +/-100 degrees Celsius. They also bombarded the thing with dust, to make sure it can handle the physical lunar environment.


In all tests, the parts performed better than expected, and researchers believe these systems can last upwards of 8 years without maintenance. Now if NASA can just get over their apparent lack of budget for manned missions to the Moon and Mars.


This post has been edited by Mark_Renton: Aug 19 2009, 02:18 PM
teyren
post Aug 19 2009, 03:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


sound interesting !! looks like really work!! plan to celebrate mid autumn festival and eat moon cake on the moon rclxm9.gif
gstrapinuse
post Aug 19 2009, 08:14 PM

Elite
****
Senior Member
696 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Ipoh, Selangor, KL


This is indeed interesting! But is they are planning to use unsustainable nuclear energy source where they must replace them from time to time or it will fully exhaust just like batt power....correct me if I'm wrong...
SUSMark_Renton
post Aug 19 2009, 09:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching
are there uranium on the moon? if so maybe they are planning to mineit there.
SUSDickson Poon
post Aug 19 2009, 10:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


There won't be any plans to colonise the moon until either space travel becomes much, MUCH safer and cheaper, or those "space greenhouse" thingies become much more viable.
robertngo
post Aug 21 2009, 05:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


on big problem with this plan is the need to launch nuclear material to space, can they accept the risk of launch failure? if the rocket blow up midway it can spray nuclear material over a huge area.
nimrod2
post Aug 21 2009, 02:39 PM

the imba one
*******
Senior Member
2,521 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: UrbanSubangJaya




well we can always use the nuclear fuel that is stable. not all fuel are dangerous in its normal form.

just that the problem of shipping it there and then processing it on the moon. haha there are so many obstacles that i can think off.

robertngo
post Aug 21 2009, 06:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(nimrod2 @ Aug 21 2009, 02:39 PM)
well we can always use the nuclear fuel that is stable. not all fuel are dangerous in its normal form.

just that the problem of shipping it there and then processing it on the moon. haha there are so many obstacles that i can think off.
*
there is already technology to use non radioactive material to create nuclear reaction?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0123sec    0.27    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 01:21 PM