Creativity is simply relative.

Just to want ask a question. How do you all defines creative?

Is creative is like:

a) Leonardo da Vinci, a painter and many2 things, he also invent scissors?
b) Einstein guys? Know theory, and the one that superficial thoughts?
c) A man that creative, where they know how to survive?

If we could see, creative is practically seen or not?

So, is creativity is matter of survival?

I really thinks that knowing Satir Change Model doesn't apply to creativity. We could be creative even we do not know that model. Even I doesn't know what is that model until i searching on the net.




Yes. It was true, as creativity also need knowledge to apply. But it was the matter of knowledge spec, depends on the work field.

Check out on Steinbeck, talented on writings, Einstein, talented on theory, and Vincent van Gogh talented on paintings.

They all creative, but in their specialized field.

If Steinbeck do theory, he will not as best as Einstein, as he was not talented in that.

Creativity, it could be painted, in writings and in many things, as people could see it as creative.

This post has been edited by kekacang: Sep 28 2009, 11:18 AM