there's a looming idea that some of u have touched, it just sits there, like a dog that's not barking. i'll highlight it for u:
creativity is a process.
society nowadays are more interested/focused on results. creativity produces results, sure enough. but creativity itself is not treated as a result. it's just a means to get the final result. what are the other means? well, imitation is one.
imitating is easier, faster and requires less effort. for example, u instruct ur students to do a painting based on a particular topic. a purely instinctive creativity would draw from experience, inward looking, and depends on his own ability to interpret. others might just go over the internet and find things that they see fit to solve the problem. these are two extremes. there's always those in between, but lets ignore that for a minute.
both produces results. but imitation produces results faster and easier. the teacher (you, the school, or society etc) is only interested that the student delivers. u cant measure creativity empirically. meaning all u have to be judged is the end product. there u will assume what creative process that the students have been through. but u will never know for sure. u're just ASSUMING.
this is the problem right now. creativity is such a bizarre activity that even the world's best expert is still arguing between them.
the society is focused on products. are we losing creativity? collectively, maybe. but we still revere in those few that are able to harness their powers. just look at the designers. society looks up to them. but try and figure out their creative process? u'll find that whatever u do, u just cant imitate them...
cool eh?
Philosophy Creativity, Are we seriously losing it?
Oct 9 2009, 08:02 AM
Quote


0.0249sec
1.19
6 queries
GZIP Disabled