Help (Garmin on N95 and 5800 suck), very very slow
|
|
 Aug 11 2009, 07:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,790 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: KL 
|
there are a lot of factor which will affect the lock time:
i) are u stationary or moving? if u are moving, will be slower ii) are u near/at the same location with wen u turn of gps? if start ur gps near where u switch it off within a short period (my case was after a meal), the re-lock is very fast. iii) obstructions/blockages |
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 07:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,790 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: KL
|
QUOTE(zac1 @ Aug 11 2009, 01:33 PM) Wat is tat . Does n95 and 5800 support it For all ur phones, pls checkBut n85 really faster then n95 . Dunno why But i even try open application on n95 and n85 together . And urn lock to satelit signal but there are really big different on lock time .  SETTINGS>POSITIONING>POSITION METHODS There will be four options -bluetooth gps -assisted gps -integrated gps -network based compare and see if both phones have the same settings on. |
|
|
Aug 12 2009, 07:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,790 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: KL
|
QUOTE(zac1 @ Aug 11 2009, 08:12 PM) same lo . Both phone choose the same option . Just now they some china forum . They claim tat n85 are using better gps receiver . N95 need slide on to get better performance . But n85 no need mind sharing the link?i googled it up on english sites but all i get is some guy named wildtudor/longtalker posting the same topic "unreliable gps signal" at more than 3 diff forums. anyway, i wouldn't be suprised if the n85 is better than the n95, but 5800 sux as well?  |
| Change to: |  0.0163sec
 0.32
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 01:59 AM |
Quote