QUOTE(Nels @ Aug 2 2009, 11:40 AM)
Emotions is a must for humans. The only thing i can think of an emotionless human, is not human.
Tools that we called today, were made by humans. Tools are emotionless but human decides on what type of emotions the tools will be depending on their liking.
Take example of knife. Knife is emotionless, but it can be used to chop stuff or kill people. There are no hesitating in knife when it comes to action. But humans are different.
If i use a knife to kill people, yes, percentage of succeed is always 100%
If i use human to kill people, no, percentage of succeed is varied depends on their emotions.
Tools (emotionless) are not = to Humans .
There is no such thing as advantages and disadvantages of having emotions. Saying that is like saying there are advantage of having a brain, and not having one. It is part of what makes human. It varies from how one's manipulate it. Emotion is a critical factor in every humans and this factor is one of the factor that varied us from one another.
What you say is partially true in the sense that human cannot be separated from emotions. At least using the current technologies. But what is discussed here is the merits of having or going without emotions. It's not possible, yet. But we still discuss it. And that's why this discussion is somewhat philosophical in nature.
Of course there is such a thing as advantages and disadvantages of having emotions. I've listed a few in the first post. Others have also listed a few in their posts.
<<If i use a knife to kill people, yes, percentage of succeed is always 100%>>
I disagree because there's such a thing called attempted murder but let's no go there.
Added on August 3, 2009, 2:36 pmQUOTE(sense_less143 @ Aug 3 2009, 01:03 AM)
I get where the question comes from, TS, I was wondering along the same lines a few days back.
I mean, imagine how much more efficient life can be without emotions! Because we have it now, we can't ever imagine being *without* it, but if we live in a world without emotions, I guess we'd just deal with it, make it work, fit it in.
It makes one wonder.. if such a lifestyle ever existed, how do we substitute socializing and bonding, our primal desires?
Interaction would then be utility only, i.e. when discussion is needed or when the presence of others is needed.
Primal desires? Copulation would be for utility also i.e. for the continuity of the human kind and not due to lust, pleasure etc.
Added on August 3, 2009, 2:38 pmQUOTE(hazairi @ Aug 3 2009, 03:25 AM)
Sometimes when it is a good thing to be emotion-less.
U won't get mad, u won't get sad.., etc..
But come to think of it..
It's a pointless life; without emotions..
The thing is... when we have no emotions, we won't feel that life is pointless.
This post has been edited by Thinkingfox: Aug 3 2009, 02:38 PM