processor 2.4Ghz + 512MB GC is the minimum~
they said 2.2 is already playable.
Hardware GPU discussion
|
|
Sep 13 2009, 06:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
it still insufficient for minimum requirement for GTA 4
processor 2.4Ghz + 512MB GC is the minimum~ they said 2.2 is already playable. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2009, 06:34 PM
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
not to mention the game is more optimize on Quad Cores
|
|
|
Sep 13 2009, 07:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
i can tell u C2D 2.66GHz also cmi...
i would say it's playable on my laptop... |
|
|
Sep 13 2009, 10:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
i heard that GTA4 father use 3 cores only instead of 4.
i also dont understand why~ Added on September 13, 2009, 10:18 pmbut i really hoping Crysis 2 will fully support Quad. for sure Cry Engine 3 will support quad rite? This post has been edited by Mr.Docter: Sep 13 2009, 10:18 PM |
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 12:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,708 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Johor Bahru |
but crysis 2 will be processor demanding? cause 3 cores i think shld be enuf...
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 01:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
hope so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 07:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
installed Catalyst 9.9b for Win7 on my laptop with Vista...
minimal changes on 3D Mark 06... |
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 10:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 11:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,951 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 12:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
iirc review from Guru3D comparing graphic performance between the 2 OS using high-end cards (GTX 295, GTX 285, HD4870x2 and HD4890), there's not much difference in terms of fps in games...
u may, however, see a slight bump in 3D Mark score, but my guess is that it comes from the less load on the CPU... |
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 05:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE(astria @ Sep 14 2009, 12:02 PM) iirc review from Guru3D comparing graphic performance between the 2 OS using high-end cards (GTX 295, GTX 285, HD4870x2 and HD4890), there's not much difference in terms of fps in games... well there is no reason for me to upgrade then. plus im quite suitable with vista. u may, however, see a slight bump in 3D Mark score, but my guess is that it comes from the less load on the CPU... |
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 06:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
well, maybe... but i'll still move to Win7, since it's less bulky...
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 06:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 07:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
not with the RC...
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 10:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,367 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 10:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
170 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: Pasir Gudang |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2009, 11:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,951 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2009, 12:08 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
170 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: Pasir Gudang |
QUOTE(Fantasia @ Sep 11 2009, 03:59 PM) as promise..edi updated my benchmark using 1280x800 but in windows 7..not xp something weird about my score... supposely..below than my old score rite?...xp>win7>vista why my score go more higher..any idea? but still lower than Fantasia score though.. Benchmark This post has been edited by itanium89: Sep 15 2009, 06:03 PM |
|
|
Sep 15 2009, 12:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,479 posts Joined: Feb 2009 |
i will try to change my resolution and see the different...btw,i can play l4d i think in the lowest setting...sometime lag abit lor
|
|
|
Sep 15 2009, 12:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
170 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: Pasir Gudang |
QUOTE(Fantasia @ Sep 15 2009, 12:16 AM) i will try to change my resolution and see the different...btw,i can play l4d i think in the lowest setting...sometime lag abit lor i have tried before play l4d..almost not playable.. arround 15fps or belowsince you use TL-60 oso lag abit edi..no wonder la if mine more worse but if do some tweak..sure playable.. This post has been edited by itanium89: Sep 15 2009, 12:45 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0278sec
0.31
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 05:35 AM |