Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Serious Making Cupid's Corner great, A serious discussion

views
     
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 04:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


ROFL!

You're trying really hard to derail and close this thread, aren't you?

Why? Does it threaten you that much?

It's quite revealing who the posters here are, who want things to remain the way it is because they feel that any change threatens their "lulz" and serenity.

No, moderators. Keep this thread OPEN.

<inappropriate language masked>

This post has been edited by samurai1337: Jul 29 2009, 08:14 AM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 04:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jul 28 2009, 04:24 PM)
So,you all want CC to be in /k forever and let /k degrade it to another /k forum with CC tag on the door?

If you want it to be like that,so be it.
*
Pshaw, don't let them.

I've beaten pariah dogs before with my bare hands.

Let me tell you their behavior: these skinny cretins are very fierce and loud and they will automatically gang up on anybody or anything they think is weak or alone.

The first kick in the ribs will take all of them by surprise even as their friend sails through the air, and then when you grab the next one by the legs and dash it against the ground the rest will be running away so hard with their tails between their legs you can hardly chase them to catch them anymore.
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 04:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(7chai @ Jul 28 2009, 04:32 PM)
making cupid's corner great ? only lifeless creature do that.
*
Please don't insult people like Silverhawk, Tatsumaki, Duke Red, Deadlocks, Noob13, and dozens of other people here who have at one time or another who have actually taken the time to advise and help fellow posters here, in comparison with people who only post mindless nonsense.

You should be ashamed of yourself for saying shit like this.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 28 2009, 04:39 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 04:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Men, do you see those other forums out there in Lowyat.net?

Forums such as

1. Health and Fitness
2. Travel and Living
3. Careers
4. Education Essentials

We can make Cupid's Corner exactly like those places.

We can turn Cupid's Corner into a repository of real knowledge, to truly benefit people.

There are many people who fear such a change. When they open their mouths to protest you know why they do so.
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 06:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Hobbes, thank you for taking the time to write out and elaborate on those points you've raised, which are indeed valid concerns.

Do allow me to address some issues you've raised.

First of all, elitism.

Elitism certainly exists here in this forum. It exists in the cadres and bands of Kopitiam people regularly making incursions here and posting nonsense just for laughs, because they are separate from the concerns of the members here and their own wants and needs for "lulz" over-rides any importance of having proper discourse in this forum. They are part of a privileged, "in" group of trolls and dupes who come in here to feel SUPERIOR to the people here.

Not all Kopitiam members are like this, of course. Only the ones who think that Cupids Corner should always remain a subordinate section of Kopitiam with no function or purpose of its own, because in that way CC shall remain always as their personal playgrounds.

Is this elitism? I think that it is.

Elitism also exists among the members of SC who confine themselves entirely to chat threads and who seldom venture out into the broader forum, because, in their own words, it is, and has always been "lame", and thus it is below them to even step foot in there. They are above such petty concerns, and they have already carved out a comfortable niche in these chat threads where everything is alright, and thus, by extension, everything else must also be just as it should be. They have extrapolated a picture of absolute serenity based on the condition of their comfortable little fiefdoms.

Is this not another form of elitism? I think it certainly qualifies.

Next, the imposition of conformity of thought and behavior on an entire forum population.

This is a knee-jerk reaction motivated only by fear and insecurity. There is so much diversity and differences in opinion here that such a thing would NEVER be possible. Any attempt to do so is bound to fail.

Creating structure and form and defining the purpose and direction of the forum does not necessarily automatically mean benefiting the few at the expense of the many. It does not mean one group coming into power at the expense of another. These are vulgar thought processes because they fail to look at things beyond their importance to the self. In short, this knee-jerk reaction is a selfish one motivated by insecurity and the fear of the loss of power.

Please ask yourself what sort of power or prestige you could truly lose in a forum.
Then ask yourself if that's as important as providing this section with more focus, filtering out the noise and chaff so that it fulfils the purpose it is meant to fulfil, which is NOT to be some person's personal playground or fiefdom.

Thirdly, we are not talking about "change", and that makes the necessity of a poll entirely superfluous. Please look back at my earlier posts. They are about

1. Providing form and structure
2. to cater to a diversity of opinions, perspectives and personal characters
3. to provide Cupid's Corner with more focus and direction rather than just "existing"
4. and we have not yet even discussed how this may yet be achieved
5. nevermind that it requires participation and collective effort from a BROAD number of people to make it happen

So please, less assumptions based entirely on knee-jerk reactions.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 28 2009, 06:52 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 28 2009, 07:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jul 28 2009, 06:58 PM)
If you really want to make CC a better place, the first thing you can start doing is refrain from replying to people who question you and what you say in such a hostile and sarcastic manner. If what you say makes sense, the majority of the people will be convinced. You don't have to call people who challenge you brainless.
Interesting concept.

But why should I be beholden to sense and civility when others are not?

You've been here a longer time than me. You're familiar with the PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE methods of argumentation and obfuscation frequently used by your troll and dupe friends. You're certainly very familiar with their brute methods of argumentation by majority where they band together to pat each other on the back for statements as simple as "duh hu hu hu".

Now by comparison if I see something truly stupid beyond words I call it brainless AND I explain why.

Is that not more direct and honorable? It certainly leaves the other party the option of defending himself fairly and even returning the favor tenfold if I'm in the wrong.

Please my dear sir. Your bias and prejudice is showing rather transparently.


Added on July 28, 2009, 7:08 pmBy the way, want to hear another form of elitism?

It is by people who rigorously push the idea that all points of views are equal and worth the same, just because they cannot discern quality.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 28 2009, 07:08 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 01:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(nickisthemost @ Jul 28 2009, 08:50 PM)
yes i do, but not only in CC rolleyes.gif

but i'm just lazy to explain cause i'm not good at it lulz, plus it's more like a waste of time for now if i want to change internet people, i rather do in real life, changing myself first (which i hope you notice) and convincing people around me to do the same =)
hmm the way you act are totally immature to me (my opinion), i said it many times attack the points not the person, yet yourself get fuel up because you can't handle critics meh, relax it's a no shame to admit our mistake, but it's a shame if we choose to ignore it =)
i came here cc to chat and express my point of views, you got any problem =P ?
*
Please don't act innocent.

I make a general statement about what we can do to improve CC and you make personal comments about how much time I supposedly have, and then you ask me how exactly *I* have changed as if that were relevant?

Don't pull a weasel tactic and then cry when people treat you like one. Don't cry about "attacking the points not the person" when that's exactly what you did when you shifted the focus from the quality of the ideas to the personal.

And besides, guess what? that tactic fails.


Added on July 29, 2009, 1:34 am
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jul 28 2009, 07:20 PM)
You were the one who suggested that the CC needs to be clean up, restructured and regulated because of all the trolling you see here. You expressed over and over again your dissatisfaction with it's current state and the behavior of fellow forumers.

Of course, you of all person should take the first step and by behaving and giving a good example to other forumers. If you decided to act as a troll when others do, you're not any better than them. The reason why /k/ behaves they way they do is because everyone does it and thus whenever someone new comes, they act they way everyone does. Same goes with the seriousness of RWI. Everyone tries to discuss seriously because that's the norm there. If one person were to give some brainless comment and everyone follows suit, that will be the end of RWI.

As far as I recall, you often calls someone or what they say brainless adequately explaining why and something foregoing explanation altogether. Furthermore, using old English and uncommon words will not help your argument but rather will make you sound condescending.
*
Guess what? I am not that important.

I am not Gandhi, I am not Jesus H. Christ, I am not Martin Luther King, I cannot spout feel good shit and act holier than thou and I will not save mankind or Cupid's Corner by doing so.

Everything you're saying about me or what I "should" or "should not" do is irrelevant.

I started a thread about improving Cupid's Corner and a whole bunch of you nitwits suddenly get twitches and pull horseshit out of left field.

You automatically assumed that only the absolute worst of change is to come and that *I* would be the one who causes it or effects it.

Did you think that *I* intended to change this place? You are wrong. I am not that important. I am not that wise. I am insignificant.

For those of you struggling hard to keep on to you personal playgrounds and little fiefdoms, continue to point your fingers at me rather than look at the broader environment. I am more than happy to distract you while other people make their moves and other things happen right under your noses. These will be things you are powerless to stop.

And look here, Mumeichan, ACN1 and whoever cares to make it personal, go and Fu.ck a soldering iron and die.

I can act like that and say that to you and harm not a single thing I have raised or discussed here, and do you know why? It's because you're doing your level best to focus your guns on me, but the IDEA is already out there, the IDEA has always been around in a gestalt form, the IDEA is accepted by the people who have the WILL to make it happen, and in the end it will be the IDEA that will bury you in your grave, not my hands. I will merely be there to laugh at you when the time comes.

Fu.cking dumbasses. Don't fu.cking surround me with idiocy and then expect me to behave like a fu.cking saint.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 29 2009, 01:53 AM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 05:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(silverhawk @ Jul 29 2009, 02:39 PM)
QUOTE
I never said it invalidates what he says. I am saying it's not going to convince and steer the people he wants to. It's not silverhawk, teongpeng and people like you who can see his points points regardless how they are presented who he needs to reach out to but it's the people who troll, the people who sanction trolling and the people ever ready to flame.

The problem lies in the assumption that he wants to change those people. I don't believe I ever seen him say he wants to change people.
*
Thanks silverhawk! Indeed, I have never said such a thing.

By the way mumeichan,

QUOTE
Sorry mods, earlier I posted something here in response to something but now I've changed my mind because my point just can't get across and I'm happy with CC the way it is. Since I can't delete the post this is the best I can do. GL guys in making CC a better place!


It has nothing to do with "your point can't get across". Your premises and assumptions have been proven wrong, thus invalidating your entire argument.

You have been OWNED.


Added on July 29, 2009, 5:08 pm
QUOTE(7chai @ Jul 29 2009, 03:25 PM)
Well, those people u state above, they are not trying to make CC a great place. They are merely sharing their thought and advice to person who need, I dun see any "great" on it, i mean it can be done by any 1. If all the sharing u did is to show how "great" u are, then yes, i shud insult u for being a lifeless creature.
*
So, who are you talking about? Did you even read the posts or did you immediately have an allergic reaction and speak from your other end?

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 29 2009, 05:08 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 05:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


By the way guys, thanks for your two cents. You know who you are. I kowtow. notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

I sincerely doubt there was anything I could have said to convince or reason with a people already so immediately hostile and threatened. rclxub.gif

Perhaps one day I shall learn what to do, apart from immediately kicking them in the fundaments. doh.gif


Added on July 29, 2009, 5:54 pm

QUOTE(^Hobbes^ @ Jul 29 2009, 11:58 AM)
Hi Dickson, my appologies i'll skip all the formality and jump right into business if you dont mind


I certainly don't mind. Your selective perception and bias is showing quite transparently.

QUOTE
I beg to differ, trolls and clowns operate on a different playing field as elitism, they dont come in here to feel supperior, they come in to have fun by making fun of others.


Lol, so trolls and clowns are just misunderstood people?
Here's a clue: the "elitism" and feelings of superiority you've ironically accused OTHERS of having have been self-professed by a large number of trolls, dupes and clowns who make forays into CC at various times. Interesting how you've been able to ignore this.


QUOTE
Regardless of which forums you go, there'll be a small community of clowns and trolls lurking somewhere, you wont be able to get rid of them, period.
People says when the buying stops, the killing stops in this context i'll rephrase it as when the feeding stops, the trolling stops
Stop feeding them what what they aimed for and slowly you'll see the numbers dwindle wink.gif
Easier said than done, i know i did refrained from feeding them and its not easy


You are wrong. There are plenty of boards and communities out there which have no trolls, simply because they have no SPACE for trolls. Not feeding trolls is not as important as not giving them a space to even exist.

The status with Cupid's Corner now is that there is the letter of the law, but not the spirit, and everybody thus conforms only to the rule. You can't swear in here, you can't call an obtuse jackass a dipshit, you can't ask a troll to eat shit and die, but trolls and dupes in here CAN use passive aggressive tactics to derail entire threads, drown out reasoning with meaningless noise and traffic, and band up in brute displays of might being right, simply because you have no rules against these things.

Ask yourself what does the status quo favor? Is it really the bastion of free speech and expression you CLAIM it is?

No. You stand for the status quo and the preferential treatment it already confers to a select group of people. This is elitism.

QUOTE
And now something for those who wants or talk about changes and making this place a better place without trolls or clowns]/i] to ponder on;
Some wise man once said Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself, did we really walk the talk or talk the talk by not feeding the trolls in the first place?
So another wise man once said The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step, and make sure that single step was taken by you and not some one else, have those who keeps whining about trolls and clowns taken that very first step by not feeding them or are they some one who only thinks about changing the world to suit them and not the other way round? Perhaps another example of elitism?


Your entire argument places the responsibility of conduct on everybody BUT the trolls themselves. In a way, you have given them a free pass to be above the conducts of behavior that everyone else must abide by, for the simple reason that you see no real way to "control" them.

All of this talk about changing oneself, walking the talk, etc, smacks too much of the GANDHIAN fallacy. Fact: Gandhi was powerless to end the caste system, after Martin Luther King was assassinated his movement was hijacked by COINTELPRO because the movement relied too much on saints and representatives, Jesus Christ supposedly died on a cross but neither Christianity nor Islam nor Judaism nor Buddhism has done anything against institutional cruelty such as SLAVERY, genocide, and countless other abuses these supposed bastions of purity and righteousness were against. In fact these religions and institutions enriched themselves by it.

And all this while, we are fed platitudes much like your own, such as "Let the one without sin cast the first stone".

In the end it was not the inward-looking man minding his own business trying to emulate a saint that has abolished slavery and ended warfare between nations.

In the end it was the WILL of a people. The priests and the monks and supposed ascetics and holy men benefiting from the status quo have always known this, and thus such a meme, that a man must first become a saint and be wholly pure first and foremost or hold his tongue and leave things be, is encouraged for the singular reason that it is an impossible and counter-productive standard to achieve.


QUOTE
To further illustrate my point above, please allow me to use some of my very crude example once again.

Now there's talk about reducing carbon foot print, so these so called pioneers and leaders in carbon reducing campaigns jets off in first class seats, conducts seminars and meetings in fully air conditioned rooms, fully and brightly lit seminar rooms and excursions by vehicles to sites and places.
You think i'd be interested to hear what they have got to say? laugh.gif
I'll be more inclined to join their cause or at least stop by and listen if they were to walk/cycle/drive a solar vehicle and conduct seminars under bright sunlights outdoor.
Is it not what we are seeing here in CC? wink.gif


How smug. You are comparing apples to oranges. Perhaps the question you should truly be asking is why these people are advocating cosmetic forms of "change" even while maintaining the status quo. Perhaps they profit from it in some way?

Maintaining the status quo, Hobbes. Does that ring a bell? Rofl!

wink.gif


QUOTE
Noticed how many forumers who genuinely have problems and expects serious/constructive answers but clueless when comes to asking questions constructively thus leading to half baked answers or spams?

Perhaps include some block diagrams to illustrate why a half baked questions will lead to half baked answers?
How to avoid that pitfall?
How to ask constructively and information needed before advice/help can be administered?
p/s Ezra take note, i know you have been aiming for a stickied thread, perhaps this may your answer wink.gif
*
Put your money where your mouth is, and create that diagram. Or start a discussion on its feasibility with the genuine intent of getting feedback. That is a form of leading by example, and you do not need to be pure and saintly to do so. Poor you if some jackasses find the need to make shift the debate into one about your personal character.

LMAO!

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 29 2009, 06:01 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 06:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE
As for my own opinions of clowns i dont resent them, i'll explain in due time.
I cannot say for the rest of the SC members, but I for sure do practice that and i certainly do have my own reasons for not venturing out into the broader forum in CC and far from what you have described as per above.

Noticed how all the genuine problem threads are mostly one sided i.e. one party complaining, everyone starts jumping into conclusion and starts dishing out advices based on assumptions?
My question is can we start judging a relationship and starts dishing advices when we have only heard one side of the story?
Guilty without trials or innocent until proven?
Example you may ask?

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1110341/+20

I've even more questions to ask than to contribute; for example, what transpire her to cheat, is the TS proven to be innocent or he too plays a role in what transpired, have the accused given a chance to defend herself and so forth, i guess i'll skip the remainder of my questions, i guess you get the idea. Something for us to ponder on, are we part of the solution or part of people's problem.

Now in this context i guess by not jumping into conclusion and further compounding the TS problem with wrong solutions via a half baked diagnosis is the best contribution, no?


Thank you for explaining. You made the correct choice. If you are not confident that you are getting the true picture, if you feel that the information you are receiving is suspect and incomplete, then it is indeed correct to refrain from believing it wholesale.

There are limits to what we can understand and can do, and it is good for you, I, and everybody to understand this.

QUOTE
Noticed how relationship experts differ from our so called experts or contributors, its the real deal experts asked both parties in for an interview inidvidually and asseses their grouses/claims (perhaps even their close friends will be called in) and then have both parties in together to give them advices and opinions


You give far too little credit to the ones you call "our so called experts or contributors".

I know a lot of very balanced, mature, experienced, wise and emphatic contributors here, and I hope that they're not on your list of "so called experts" just because they are not in the vocation of giving out professional advice.

QUOTE
Sometimes people with relationship problems may not even need a solution, relationship is not maths, it doesnt neccesarily needs a solution. Allow me to illustrate my point in a crudely manner as usual wink.gif

We have 2 individuals A and B both married or in a relationship, A have grouses with his/her other half, and the other party is not in the mood to discuss yet.
Most of A's circle of friends knows B and some are close to him/her, A does not wants to misled/change his friends point of view on B through his rants, neither is he comfortable to rant with strangers/not so close friends in real life.
He/she comes into CC and rant anonymously, here comes the part where we in CC can contribute, is to lend an ear or perhaps eyes in this matter and not starts to judge/advice or go morally right or wrong.
Silence can be a virtue.


Or we can say things as it they are, as has been done by many good contributors here. We can point out the insecurities and biases that color the poster's opinions and rants, the better that he or she may REFLECT on this and help make the relationship less dramatic and more rewarding.

You favor listening over assessment, feedback and criticism. Is this wise? In my opinion, this is too passive a behavior.

QUOTE
Now as usual a few clowns or trolls jumps in and post Tits or gtfo or along the lines of those one liners post we are so often used to see.
Who knows those one liners may have cracked the TS up and lighten his bluesy day?


ROFL! Who knows??? Who knows indeed! More selective perception Hobbes? More excuses for such behavior? More IMPROBABLE outcomes that supposedly arise from this?

QUOTE
In this context i'd say they certainly did contributed to this small community in a way as compare to those who practiced the hollier than thou and all self justified morally right posts.
Hence my earlier statement that i do not resent trolls and clowns


An astute observer will merely notice that your moral compass is either heavily flawed or too influenced in positive bias for these trolls and clowns themselves.

QUOTE
Point in case poisonous snakes can be a hazard to human, but look at the bigger picture; they do contribute to the ecosystem by reducing the amount of rats.


Leprosy, malaria, filiarisis, dracunculiasis, smallpox, tuberculosis, all among other things and forms of life that have been marked for ERADICATION.

QUOTE
All that glitters is not gold
If you think their posts are all rubbish, think again, there's always recycling.


And sometimes things that smell like shit are indeed diseased turds and you need not feel them and taste them before you make a confirmation. Sometimes instincts are correct. I shudder at the day people lose touch with their instincts and instead get carried away by high-falutin' statements and platitudes.

QUOTE
Another misconception that most people in chat threads spams rubbish and only confine themselves in that little space without any tangible contribution to this small little community.

Chat threads are there for various reasons, I shall not waste your time by pointing out the obvious reasons, but would love to share some of the less obvious ones with you.

Some people have problems confiding to strangers especially those pertaining to sensitive and confidential issues. Chat threads can be a way to break the ice and when people with problems are comfortable with certain members of the thread, its easier for them to spill the beans albeit on a private basis perhaps via pm, msn and so forth.

I've borrowed my partially impaired ears to some people in CC on issues ranging from sex to work related issues chipping in my 0.000002 rupiah worth of opinions when ever i can via private channels like pm.
In case you are thinking to challenge me on the above point for prove, no i dont have prove nor do i need to. I'll gladly admit that i'm a liar, after all i am one who dont believe in divulging people's confidentiality to back one's credibility and betraying their trusts in the process.
Also I am aware that certain members do contribute to this little community on a quiet basis that way and are also members of SC, hints: nicknames starting with S and P
Again a misconception and thoughts derived from assumptions.


It is not a misconception or an assumption. It is rhetoric

QUOTE
There's nothing for those who resent points you've made to loose.
In the clowns and trolls case, they can always migrate to another forum or lay low for the time being they have yet to loose any freedom or potential fun at all.


Yes, and the trolls know this. They don't fear banhammers. They fear fundamental changes that will give them no space to exist.

Health and Fitness
Education Essentials
Careers
Business Opportunities

All of these are, or have become, forums wholly dedicated to their topics and subject matters.

This is why trolls and the friends and apologists of trolls will do everything they can to obfuscate the matter and derail the discussions, and this is also why they will fail. It is so easy to get rid of trolls, they are so small and powerless before the grand scheme of things, they know that they make their fun entirely out of the faultlines and loopholes, when these things no longer exist then neither shall they.

QUOTE
Still i dont resent them for reasons i've illustrated in my above point.
They'll certainly be back,like they always do, prove can be had if you lurk long enough in kopitiam. wink.gif


Trolls and dupes are NOT important. What is important is that Cupid's Corner has it's own purpose and direction, and a STRONG one, influenced by a COLLECTIVE community effort. Cupid's Corner must have a sense of destiny that is separate from the affairs and concerns of Kopitiam if it is to be a relevant section, and anything more than a joke.

QUOTE
Again we can never achieve a 100% perfect environment that suits everyone.
I'll illustrate my above point with yet again another crude example.

In an agriculture environment, we can never have a 100% yield throughput all the time, we are bound to have deseases and pest invasions every now and then, the only defensive method we can apply is to use pesticides to safe guard our investments.

Now National Geographic Magazine ran an article some time ago about food supplies specifically grains, during the 70s or thereabout, in order to feed the amount of people, we turned to scientific methods which seemingly did more good than harm and almost doubling production throughput.
Today we are paying the price of what seems to be a good change 30 years ago.
Our waters and grains are so poluted with pesticides and artificial fertilizers that certain villages are now in dire need of fresh clean water.
Its also linked with health hazards like cancers.
We are also facing overpopulation spurred by cheaply available grains back then.


Are you aware of the politics and history of food production and population control? If you are, then let's discuss this in RWI.

Or perhaps your point is that we should be wary of unforeseen circumstances.

My friend, if everybody were as afraid of unforeseen circumstances and "what ifs" all the time, nothing would get done.

That may represent an ideal world to many. The serenity of nothing ever changing, of everything being as it is for all time, of people coping. For some people this is heaven. For me, this is just another face of death.

Those of us born in THIS generation take FAMINE for granted. We do not know what it means to actually be in a condition where there is absolutely no food to be had for MILES around you.

These were conditions that people actually had to deal with throughout history, thus the focus on food production, to END famine and the incredible loss of life that ensues, which wreaks widespread havoc through the entire structure of human society from the very TOP to the utmost bottom.

In the 14th century the Dutch, along with other Europeans, were amongst the most impoverished people on earth. Famines and food shortages were frequent. But one day the will of a people rose up, an identity was formed in opposition to subservience and dominance by "others", and this same will undertook measures to end famine once and for all. After a few hundred years of head start the Dutch are today one of the tallest people in the world.

That you live in an age with an abundance and variety of food should have given you pause to consider the agricultural and market forces that have made such a thing possible.

----

By the way, there is simply too much wall of text to further dissect and refute. rclxub.gif

In any case, I think I've gotten my point across. There is simply too much selective bias and elitism in your post, ironically the very things you have accused others of having, for your arguments and positions to be considered a truly impartial and balanced view of things.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jul 29 2009, 06:39 PM
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 06:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jul 29 2009, 06:37 PM)
Just as I predicted. I knew this will happen.
*
You ARE the messiah after all. icon_idea.gif
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 06:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jul 29 2009, 06:41 PM)
I'm human, and a n00b one at that. Seriously.
*
Ya, no worries, was just teasing you laugh.gif smile.gif

Don't kill me icon_question.gif
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 06:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jul 29 2009, 06:46 PM)
How can a n00b ever hope to kill a pr0?  notworthy.gif  laugh.gif
*
You are far too kind and forgiving of my idiocy. rclxub.gif

I abase myself before you in gratitude of your mercy! notworthy.gif

-------

Oh btw, on a serious note:

One more thing I would like to clarify - the perhaps anti-kopitiam tone in my arguments.

I am not anti-kopitiamites at all, but I can't take for granted that everybody will know this so I had better explain.

There are a lot of members from kopitiam in CC but the one thing that separates one group from the other is their amount of respect for this section's purpose, and their empathy to the people who post here.

One type has it. The other does not. Simple as that. I can usually tell which is which, and my opposition and disdain is to the latter category.

The former are cool in my book even though we might disagree vehemently and in a personal manner. icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 07:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jul 29 2009, 07:09 PM)
But if CC is really going to become what's is going to be, be wary of what I've mentioned. The social gap conflict.
Ok, I think I understand what you mean now with that "ada wang ada amoi" thing, although I did not see it at the time.
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 07:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


But now I see it too, so I'm unsure if I have progressed to pro or regressed back to noob. Which is which? rclxub.gif

I have a headache and need to lie down.
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 09:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(nickisthemost @ Jul 29 2009, 07:44 PM)
meh he can say what ever he wants cause people can pretend anything on the internet when something goes wrong, who really knows what he really is thinking lulz, does cc really needs clean up ? i feel it's still fine, untill people want to make it like RWI, you know how boring that would be

why can't we attack his character since attitude is part of making cc a better place =) ?

plus i don't see any consultant or counselor being harsh in their words, when they're giving advices to people that are troubles, and they are real professional compare to the people like dickson yet they choose this kind of approach
*
Dude, the only thing I did was start a discussion! When have I ever said that *I* want to change this place to an RWI clone? In fact when has anybody in here said that (apart from you)? Almost everybody has universally voiced opposition to such a thing! doh.gif

What's with all the accusations??? I can't take it anymore. wacko.gif

*Crawls under a table to gibber silently*
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 09:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


They win la. I got a mental breakdown already. wacko.gif
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 29 2009, 10:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


^ ROFL!!! Gee thanks a lot Thanatos, for saying this NOW.

If I'd known earlier I would have crawled right back into bed. rclxub.gif
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 30 2009, 02:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


If you create a poll then the people who have the most dupes will win it ler. Polls don't mean anything.
SUSDickson Poon
post Jul 31 2009, 02:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Just move under Lifestyle lor. Not that complicated laa.

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0252sec    1.19    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 01:44 PM