The weird background colour is due to a certain advertisement from a certain mobile telco that uses that weird colour.
Clear enough? :-)
Forex V6
Forex V6
|
|
Jan 18 2010, 09:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
The weird background colour is due to a certain advertisement from a certain mobile telco that uses that weird colour.
Clear enough? :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2010, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 19 2010, 12:02 AM) Hahaha... that sleepwalking joker is too scared to answer my PM... either that or a case of too arrogant. Anyone else can help enlighten me on this legality issue. That is why I didn't answer. The question has been answered in previous post. Furthermore, next time if you are asking something serious, don't use the subject : Hey Bro... that is not how you ask questions.What a joke! Added on January 19, 2010, 4:24 pm QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 19 2010, 09:47 AM) If you downloaded the forms from your broker and showed them, wouldn't it be clear that it is indeed forex that you are dabliing in? BNM has not changed it's rules on forex. It has always been the same. There are people doing this for years and nothing has happened to them, even those openly declaring to LHDN. Only recently it got into the news headlines. Still everything is the same as always. Banks never question my inflows of cash as they are transferred from an overseas bank. It is not considered income as it is money transferred from outside of Malaysia.One more thing, there is no limit to the amount of funds that you can bring into Malaysia, hence it would never be questioned by the bank unless the transfer info wasn't clear and they need more clarification. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 19 2010, 04:28 PM |
|
|
Jan 19 2010, 06:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
We can always be trading in gold too since it is in the same platform.
This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 19 2010, 06:26 PM |
|
|
Jan 19 2010, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 19 2010, 08:32 PM) Added on January 19, 2010, 8:39 pm Cherroy, going by your definition, wouldn't it be more precise to say that what we do with FX is in fact spread-betting than anything else? This is also same as retail forex, or also known as off-exchange retail forex transactions. We are not trading the actual currency but rather 'borrowing' the value from the broker. If you have an account with a US broker, your transaction would be in USD. Just say you buy the EUR/GBP pair. You don't trade either in EUR or GBP. You are just betting against the broker on the spread in USD. There is no USD to EUR or GBP exchange. Hence this is not an actual transaction done at the exchange (where they actually sell/buy the currency). When the transaction is done, you are returned the spread if the value of the spread has increased between EUR/GBP pair. Added on January 19, 2010, 9:14 pm QUOTE(myvi5949 @ Jan 19 2010, 08:53 PM) They want to get rid of the 1:100 leverage.. and make allow only 1:10 leverage.. Take a pick..Can u help me save some time? FX Solutions, GFT, Oanda, IBFX, Gain Capital, FXCM, FXDD, PFG Best and CMS Forex will move together in this issue in order to avoid this rule. If the proposal passes the US fx industry will cease to exist and be either bankrupt or go offshore. http://www.fxstreet.com/news/forex-news/ar...ae-d21f004d395f These are the forex companies grouping together against CFTC. They are NFA regulated and should be safer than the others. And if they enforce the 10:1 leverage, I'd just transfer my account from the US broker to their European branch. Problem solved. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 19 2010, 09:16 PM |
|
|
Jan 19 2010, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(cheez @ Jan 19 2010, 09:21 PM) They are all US based. I'm with FXDD and they just received approval to operate in EU. I'm sure they'd expedite the operations there if and when CTFC enforces the 10:1. They don't want to lose their customers to other EU/UK based operations. |
|
|
Jan 20 2010, 11:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(cheez @ Jan 20 2010, 11:15 PM) Hi all pros/ pros to be, can i use my credit card to open an account with the brokers instead of transferring money through wire? Most brokers will only allow withdrawal of funds back to the account that did the initial funding. If you use credit card, you'd only be able to transfer back to your credit card. TT direct from your bank account is the best option. If you have no cash and have to use credit card to fund, then you should not be trading.How safe will that be? So far anyone using EU based broker? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2010, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(Sham903n @ Jan 22 2010, 02:24 PM) since citibank is in the BNM list.. I wonder if I can open and trade with citifx.. 10k usd min to open a retail account Citibank is an authorised foreign exchange but not for spot/retail forex.Added on January 22, 2010, 5:41 pm QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 22 2010, 02:56 PM) CitiFXPro Sales User to me They are not available in all countries either. Not just Malaysia.show details Jan 18 (4 days ago) Dear Vinni, Hello! Thank you for your interest. We regret to inform you that at this moment, we do not offer spot FX margin trading accounts to residents in Malaysia. Thank You. Yours Sincerely, CitiFX Pro Sales Team Haha.. already tried that. THEY DONT ALLOW FOR MALAYSIANS. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 22 2010, 05:41 PM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 25 2010, 08:47 AM) It is not calculate by percentage, Maybank will charge a RM10 for bank wire and the exchange rate vary from all the banks. So far i tried Maybank & HSBC before by using bank wire, I found that HSBC exchange rate always cheaper than Maybank but bank charges is RM25. Maybank charges RM25 transfer fee too.Added on January 25, 2010, 9:56 am QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 23 2010, 04:55 PM) MNet, some brokers claim that they dont trade against you. Example, ibfx says they dont do desk-dealing, and they have true interbank liquidity. Then they have ECNs who also say they pass your orders to be filled by other traders. So how does what you say work here? Do you understand their statement of interbank liquidity? Again, you are dealing directly with a broker and not the bank. If you were dealing with the bank, your orders will take minutes to fill out and not seconds. All the no dealing desk claims are just marketing quotes. There used to be brokers that tries to match your orders to a reverse order and that slows down the dealing. Sometime it takes 10-15 seconds to fill the order. Nowadays, platforms takes 1-2 seconds to fill an order because you are dealing with the broker.Again, do another round of check with the brokers and answer me this question. They have a limit on the order amount, although it differs from broker to broker, there is always a maximun order that you can place. Why is that I ask you? Why is there a limit if the order goes directly to the bank? BIG orders are to use ECN platforms and not the usual MT4 trader accounts. Once you find out why they impose this restriction, you will then understand what I've been trying to tell you all these time. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 25 2010, 09:56 AM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 25 2010, 11:24 AM) You want sauce with that question? I give you sauce.... Maybe you got it mixed up with TT to Singapore only, which cost RM10. Overseas all RM25.http://www.maybank2u.com.my/mbb_info/m2u/p...l/ACC-Accounts/ This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 25 2010, 11:32 AM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 03:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 25 2010, 02:23 PM) The blur sotong live chat support IBFX personnel says the limit is because "some currency pairs does not have enough liquidity to support anything above 50 lots. So there is the limit of 50 lots for every one". Some currency pairs don't have enough liquidity or IBFX don't have enough liquidity to support the order. Ah, you have just been given the run around by IBFX. Clever live chat. They don't have enough liquidity and they say that the currency pair itself does not have liquidity. You see where this is heading now? There is more money in the forex market than anything else combined in this world and yet the live chat can say the currency pair does not have enough liquidity? Hahhahahahaha...Does that answer your question? So who actually does not have enough liquidity? The currency or the broker? This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 25 2010, 03:18 PM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 06:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
As blur as the customer service is, he actually answered your question.
"If you are going to open an account of that size then you will would probably want to pay for a direct feed to the banks. We don't offer this service." You told him that you are going to have a 5 million account. He said, if you are so big, you'd probably want to pay for a direct feed to the banks, a service with they do not offer. So you know what I mean now? All of us deal with the broker and not with the bank. We are not even in the actual exchange. It is as though we do not exist. The wikipedia that you read mentioned retail players. Those retail players are like pip mutt (your fictitious client), who has 5 million to play but pip mutt is not a bank. Therefore pip mutt has to open an account with a direct connection to the bank and play there. Those are the so called retail players that actually move the market. We, on the other hand, play with the broker, off the exchange. What we do does not make any market movement. Understand now? This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 25 2010, 06:13 PM |
|
|
Jan 25 2010, 10:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 25 2010, 06:22 PM) Look at the first chat log for thsi statement from that live chat; I guess this is not going to end until we have a proper source or explanation. Ok. Take a look at page 126 of the CTFC proposal quoted below. Read point 2. Here's the link to the entire proposal of the 10:1 leverage. This is how the CTFC defines the retail forex dealer. Understand now or do you need simpler words?[21:28:53] Client Services 80: Actually, most of that trading is done on specific currency pairs. Also, we aren't connected to every bank in the world to be able to provide that amount of liquidity. What I understand from the above is that it pre-supposes that they are actually connected to some banks for providing liquidity. Not all the banks but some. Are you saying that regardless if they are connected to any banks or none at all, our dealings are solely limited to the broker's side therefore it is not forex that we are participating in? In simple words. http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@new...lesproposal.pdf YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING POINTS BEFORE DETERMINING WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOU. (1) TRADING IS NOT ON A REGULATED MARKET OR EXCHANGE – YOUR DEALER IS YOUR TRADING PARTNER WHICH IS A DIRECT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. BEFORE YOU ENGAGE IN ANY RETAIL FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRADING, YOU SHOULD CONFIRM THE REGISTRATION STATUS OF YOUR COUNTERPARTY. The off-exchange foreign currency trading you are entering into is not conducted on an interbank market, nor is it conducted on a futures exchange subject to regulation as a designated contract market by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The foreign currency trades you transact are trades with the futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer as your counterparty. WHEN YOU SELL, THE DEALER IS THE BUYER. WHEN YOU BUY, THE DEALER IS THE SELLER. As a result, when you lose money trading, your dealer is making money on such trades, in addition to any fees, commissions, or spreads the dealer may charge. (2) AN ELECTRONIC TRADING PLATFORM FOR RETAIL FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS IS NOT AN EXCHANGE. IT IS AN ELECTRONIC CONNECTION FOR ACCESSING YOUR DEALER. THE TERMS OF AVAILABILITY OF SUCH A PLATFORM ARE GOVERNED ONLY BY YOUR CONTRACT WITH YOUR DEALER. Any trading platform that you may use to enter off-exchange foreign currency transactions is only connected to your futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer. You are accessing that trading platform only to transact with your dealer. You are not trading with any other entities or customers of the dealer by accessing such platform. The availability and operation of any such platform, including the consequences of the unavailability of the trading platform for any reason, is governed only by the terms of your account agreement with the dealer. (3) YOUR DEPOSITS WITH THE DEALER HAVE NO REGULATORY PROTECTIONS. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2010, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(chanlf @ Jan 26 2010, 11:00 AM) Hi, You do have to keep in mind that you can only withdraw to the account that initially funded the deposit. So if you use your credit card, you can only refund back to your credit card.Yesterday i did check with Alpari UK regarding the fees they charges for deposit/withdrawal. I felt better deposit them using credit card, any one here know whether bank will have extra charges beside the amount we deposit? Deposit through bank wire: RM25(local bank charges) + GBP 6( UK bank charges) = RM 58+- Deposit through Credit Card: 1.75% on top of your credit card. Withdrawal: £18 <= anyone know this is usd/gbp? http://www.alpari.co.uk/en/customer_servic...osit_funds.html http://www.alpari.co.uk/en/customer_servic...draw_funds.html Thanks in advance. Furthermore, creditcards have very bad exchange rate. You might want to check the exchange rate with your credit card before starting the deposit. BTW.. did you read the link that you provided to us? You can't fund with creditcard from Malaysia. # Credit/Debit card (except residents of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Chile, Egypt, Estonia, Indonesia, India, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Romania, South Africa & South Korea) £18 <= anyone know this is usd/gbp? <= IS THIS A TRICK QUESTION? This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 26 2010, 12:09 PM |
|
|
Jan 26 2010, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(chanlf @ Jan 26 2010, 12:09 PM) Oh really, i was not aware of that. If this is the case, i have to deposit using bank wire. Then I guess you didn't even read the link before asking us for the details and you definitely didn't even look at this "£18 <= anyone know this is usd/gbp?" before asking us whether it is in GBP or USD. I guess some of us here does not even know what "£" stands for.Thanks for your information anyway. Are you sure you are ready to trade? |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(chanlf @ Jan 27 2010, 02:33 PM) Why would you be even holding anything before FOMC and Bernanke's re-election and/or possible resignation? Any bad news and the stock market tumbles, investor's fleeing to USD and good-bye GU. If you are lucky, then things go your way. Technicals versus fundamentals, technical will always lose. It does not matter how good you analysis can be, the news tonight can undo everything. I do not enter the market with "If I'm lucky... " or "I hope the market will...". |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 02:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(kevler @ Jan 27 2010, 02:50 PM) You don't get what I mean. I'm not talking about long term fundamentals. I'm talking about tonight. I'm talking about fundamental announcements. Did your technical analysis show a 100 pip drop in GU yesterday due to a poor GDP in 30mins? No but the Fundamental Announcement did when it announced GDP lower than expected and the GU dropped like a rock.So, with your mighty technical analysis, what does it show you tonight if Bernanke does not get the votes? Or what happens if he gets the vote and resigns? What happens if he gets the votes and stays on but announces possible interest rate hike in Q2? There is nothing in your technical analysis that can beat those news. I'm rather sad that we have people trading in forex with such little understanding of the trade itself. On a day like this, the day before the FOMC, there is one thing that technicals do not show you. Technicals will not tell you NOT TO TRADE on the day before FOMC due to the lack of direction. Technicals will show you a possible trend but all trends can be changed with news. Your current analysis shows a bearish tread. That's fine if nothing happens with tonight's FOMC. Things go on as your per analysis. However, if Bernie were to said something that the market didn't like, it's going to go against your analysis. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 27 2010, 03:02 PM |
|
|
Jan 28 2010, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(Volatile369 @ Jan 27 2010, 11:13 PM) If u study technical analysis well, u would know that it is not just 'it touched sum pattern or S & R' stuff, there is a story behind every formations, why it hold, why it breakout, all these have 'something' to do wiv trader's behaviour and psychology. One simple question. How many of us here are actually fund managers? If it works for them it does not mean it works for us. Most if not all traders here are considered short term aka holding orders less than a month. Medium and long term players hold their orders for 3-6 months.There are many ppl such as longterm value investors disagree wiv watching markets everyday, they rather watch cashflows, bt one thing they din know is that when everything comes together in the pieces the market provides, it is a story to tell. But of coz there is no 100%, coz humans are emotional, always hv flaws, we can only have high probability of sumthing to occur, not 'sure thing'. Actually playing wiv technical analysis(wiv gud money management) is to earn profit by probability, which means earn, lose, earn lose, lose, mostly lose. But when we lose we lose small, when we win, we win alot coz of the reward we were right. So we us traders is not sumthing very unique in terms of skill, we were all jz playing wiv probability. If want to sum up, Techies are more using a 'safe haven' to trade, coz they can look through their trade wiv minimum lost. fundies need to be sure they are right. If not will hv to bear the slightly bigger loses. So my suggestion is traders shud have both skill in order to get the more big picture of the markets. Sleepwalker, sum hedgefund managers only use Technical Analysis to trade thou, look at this video:(bt of coz u guys need to judge by urself if he is a pure techie) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYDdiGFI9yQ Watching the market everyday is the only way to learn and the only way to trade. 95% of the people who lose in this market is because they treat it like a game. They treat it like an investment where you put your money in and forget about it. No, if they want that they should go invest in mutual funds. This is a trading business where you are going against your broker. He wants your money. You want his. It's not fair game as the broker has spreads on his side. Anybody that does not put this as 2nd priority in life (1st being either your own business or work), will not make it as a trader. You don't put a half hearted effort into something you want to succeed. That is why this is called trading. This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Jan 28 2010, 09:06 AM |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(tachlio @ Jan 29 2010, 08:34 AM) ya if they really implement this, i sure switch to UK broker, there still not yet apply NFA rule. NFA's jurisdiction is only for brokers in the US. Does not apply to their branches outside of US. THat is why if and when they implement this rule, it is just a simple procedure to move the accounts from the US branch to their other branches outside of US.Mostly it wont implement it, 1:10 is too easy MC le |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
QUOTE(Nidz @ Jan 29 2010, 11:52 AM) guys, i wanna ask sumting. Remember, if you do your initial funding from moneybookers.com, you can only withdraw your forex funds back into moneybookers.com.. forever. If you can live with that, then fine.im using fxprimus broker, and it only accepts payment from moneybookers.com. so ive sign up and got my credit card verified. bt the problem is, when i tried to fund my account using cc, they ask me to verify my cc using 'verified by visa' program. one popup came out, later it close itself and nothing happen. suddenly my transaction failed.... anyone can help wut im facing? tqvm As for the verified by visa program, some banks in Malaysia has adopted a second level of verification, namely MasterCard® SecureCode™ and Verified by VISA. Some e-commerce sites require that you have this level of protection before accepting your credit card. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0527sec
0.21
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 02:43 PM |