Carbon dating or C14 is how they determine the number of years, please look it up before comment, these discussions require more than just SPM science which represent the level of mentality or intelligence among ordinary people, I fail my SPM but I learn from Encyclopedias and I can understand most of them.

If you want to see evidence of the process that is not millions of years ago, go from Africa to China, somewhere in the middle is brown coloured skin. Towards Neanderthal are the European, do you see the colour palette and facial features? African resemble the gorilla, most indigenous people look like monkey and we know that skin colour is due to the climate and only mixed gene has got the advantage of colour selection such as eye and hair. These are the evidence in modern time evolution and we are the only homo that survived because others are weak an extincted long ago.

Many species don't evolve much such as cockroach & crocodile, chimpanzee share the nearest gene with human with small variation and look at the difference. They are the only primate that use stick to fight off predator. As far as I know, animal has more complex gene than human not less.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Aug 15 2009, 09:52 AM

If you found A & C, the in between is B which is the missing link, anything could happen during that time to the vulnerable homo species comparing the physical build and are likely the last in the food chain.

Zoology / anthropology begins with theory at first and its progress is slow due to the dependence of hard evidence and technology to unveiled the secrets from any remains, water are found in the “Star dust” project collected from the trail of a comet suggests that live may actually begin from elsewhere.

Each human is highly capable to learn & mimic from the generation before but our brain’s recording and analyzing abilities is limited, so it is the specialized individuals who work and archive the enormous amount of knowledge where ordinary people only scratched the surface than really understand.

Evolution changes everything and everything came from something, there are all kinds of minerals and pollutants in our system that we share on Earth, crocodile has the strongest antibody known to science and they live for so long keeping its features than evolve into something else.

So, if human only need technology to continue living, the physical appearance will remain and maintain by exercise or else will really change shape in less than one lifetime.

Is there a flaw to simulate what is B from A & C regardless of portion?
We are the living proof of the result, or you are implying we are created by god from Adam & Eve? how many percent of science is around us than god's presence? PHD is a doctrine of science.

In my industry, programmers have decoded light & shadows into software including physic simulation that can only be captured with camera in less than 40 years, the progress is based on facts of the past contribution and the same methodologies goes to all sectors until today. Look around you, is there anything you can make? If not, what role do you think you play in the science process?

In here science is hard proof that accumulated from at least 2 thousand years of recorded history to allow us communicate in cyberspace, it is everything to make schools and educate us to become the person we are today, absolutely non fiction.

Really..... I saw movies like that long time ago.

Part 1 summary: The TV sets has nothing to do with innovation, it is a separate invention not related, the collected fossil remains is no match with his theory. Look at the shape, a fool can tell it is not related, so we are made to believe.

Awaiting part 2.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Mar 29 2010, 05:45 PM

You mean they the alien leave one starchild hybrid behind but took away all tecnology? I am more incline to think that it might be one minority species that extincted before homo.

The STARCHILD project is asking for public donation, why can't they get government funding or the National Geographic Society? Why wait until now since they have it way back in 1998? I think they want to make money and took them so long to come up with the method of approach yet only photos and tested by who? The website don't offer credible facts only reference, like a blog more.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Apr 1 2010, 11:32 AM

It is how some of us think we know based on what we have seen on tv, movies that has influenced our mind. If the pyramid is build with high technology, it would have look a bit more polished than just cubical stone piling on top of each other, sand could be the sliding medium than crane system. Also there would have been markings like you cast a logo onto your proud creation, with high tech tools than primitive carving.

As for the weed crop thing, the farmers already admitted the act and shown the technique before they die with the sin, those who didn't update their knowledge still cling on the old books and Star Trek supports their ideology, there was a season with the bald captain that talked about science at the end of each episode. It is the longest science fiction sequel in history that casts a deep impression in the minds that grow up watching them.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Apr 3 2010, 12:18 AM

A missing link video.

What is the race of Adam & Eve and which part of Earth were they put on?

I like the definite answer not speculation please, if they are Arabian, how does other race come about and when was they created? also how they too become sinners?

Children of Adam & Eve practice incest to populate but why is it deemed illegal now? So people become black if live in Africa long enough, all Malaysian will become indigenous (Sakai) and everyone is a bumiputra, Good eh? But why the Iraqi clans still fight among themselves, we should all kill ourselves to return to god and become god's bet again otherwise sinners continue to populate.

I see a pattern of newbie keep popping up to insert religious views, bumping topics everywhere. It makes me less interested to come to Lowyat.net. This is ashamed that people here practice nuisance, perhaps there is an agenda or may just to make worthless traffic.

I want to learn about science not religion nor someone's narrow views, I am signing out.

Ancient human-like creature's skull probed.
BBC News

Hobbit island, Indonesia.


Human evolution is like growing up process, one cannot be an adult before adolescent is the simplest explanation I know of that support all kinds of living things.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Apr 14 2010, 02:21 AM

The latest I saw on Discovery science: Ardi, the earliest fossil remains found that are closer to human than chimpanzee / gorilla.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardi

This thread is not for people to paste their religion but debatable findings, you represent your religion and obligated to paste?

Because your religion is not debatable and this thread can move on with scientific findings than fixed religious scripture.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Feb 2 2011, 01:20 PM

Hmm... no evolution eh? What about ghost, god or alien? We don't see it in documentary but so many people believe those exist. You don't have to see anything to believe the strangest thing exist. I do believe some people's brain are like the caveman, however you try to educate them, they can't learn much and will remain stagnant at some level.

There are terms created for these people, known as dumb, stupid and idiot are very common, they are among us and may even be you and me, only the smart and clever one will know though. That is why some people are rich and many are poor...

So the term "Evolution" does not completely cover all living things or some has reached its limit?
Why change and why extinct? Surely there are reason and no reason, if you understand the term well, how do you thing scientist is able to know the age of our planet, the sun and when a star will die? If no evolution, how about mutation? If that occur, its evolving. In your description, ghost / god don't exist because no proof but majority wins, don't matter if you believe or not, our one lifetime is too short to know and understand everything you conclude it does or does not exist.

The terms given to the unexplained is fine but the story about it is crappy, story is all there is to it, how convincing is up to the script. It has great influence in people in the past but not in modern days where people are educated and rely on science. Science will change natural evolution.

Anyone can write a story and publish everywhere, it has to come from credible source not the sos bottle.