Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Astronomy Space Travel., Imagine we colonise other planets

views
     
SeaGates
post Jun 15 2009, 11:23 PM

Kisses to the world
Group Icon
VIP
1,780 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere


QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 15 2009, 11:02 PM)
Isnt it some sort of theoretical material?
IIRC, if you create matter out of pure energy, anti matter will appear, since they're like twins of each other, evil one that is.

Nuclear fission produces a tiny amount of anti-matter too but it's so little that, bgeh's mentioned 'nanogram' sounds like a few megatons in perspective laugh.gif

Space exploration is possible if we can achieve a self-sustained ecosystem on the ship or so. Energy will be important as everything solid can be recycled into their original state with the proper amount of energy. Can't rely on solar, no sun no juice. Fusion is good but there aren't proper working generator and it also require fuel.

You will also need to have enough material in cycle to sustain life. If say an entire ship will depend on grain as food, you'll need to have enough of grain to feed the human while newer grain grow and so on.

After all that, you have to handle the ravage human instinct. Munity is just too stupid if you're on a mission to save human race.

Headache laugh.gif
SeaGates
post Jun 16 2009, 06:48 PM

Kisses to the world
Group Icon
VIP
1,780 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere


QUOTE(Thinkingfox @ Jun 16 2009, 02:10 PM)
I think it's still cheaper to build in on earth and propelling to space, than to build in space itself because apart from propelling the materials, you have to use resources to propel the transporters and the workers back and forth. Then you need to think of outerspace lodging and food for the workers.
*
There are several advantage building in space.

Building in space meaning the ship do not have to cope with gravity, only the force of the ship's acceleration/deceleration, thus saving material.

Modular configuration, the world's most expensive lego set. Like the ISS laugh.gif

Design doesn't need to be aerodynamic since there aren't air resistance, sure there's space dust but that's a small amount unless you're zooming across space really fast.
SeaGates
post Jul 4 2009, 08:07 PM

Kisses to the world
Group Icon
VIP
1,780 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere


QUOTE(Aurora @ Jul 1 2009, 11:49 PM)
How about wormhole? Like in Stargate? If space travel is possible, I like to travel to the end of universe. I'm always curious if the universe ever had an end, and if so, how does it really look or feel like.
*
Traveling through wormhole is still a theory. We are having difficulty proving wormhole's existence let alone manipulate it to travel through laugh.gif

Even such technology exist, you still need to physically travel to your destination to build the 'gate', so it's still back to the good old rocket riding.

This post has been edited by SeaGates: Jul 4 2009, 08:08 PM
SeaGates
post Jul 5 2009, 12:25 AM

Kisses to the world
Group Icon
VIP
1,780 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere


QUOTE(Aurora @ Jul 4 2009, 09:32 PM)
At least the possibility to travel within ones life-cycle is possible with wormhole. Who say we need to travel to destination to build the 'gate'? You watch too many stargate already. laugh.gif
*
Natural wormholes that have been theorized with eccentric characteristic. They appear and disappear at their own will, having random exits, and maybe it even takes you to nowhere. It's like playing Russian roulette with a semi automatic weapon.

So the best way to travel is probably through one that is being artificially sustained/created.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0187sec    0.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 05:30 AM