Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Physics Physics club, for all physics fan of all level

views
     
Eventless
post Jun 23 2009, 06:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Easiest answer to the magnetic field question is the poles of the magnetic field are closest in a U shaped magnet. The closer the poles are the stronger the magnetic field since it doesn't spread out much due to distance.
vick5821
post Jun 23 2009, 06:11 PM


*******
Senior Member
3,871 posts

Joined: May 2008

the magnetic field overlap in U shaped?


Added on June 25, 2009, 2:34 pmIs a current carrying conductor an electromagnet? not winded with selenoid one

This post has been edited by vick5821: Jun 25 2009, 02:34 PM
ninty
post Jul 4 2009, 06:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


Wah, very hard to find malaysians who like this stuff

I don't take physics, but I'm interested in it.
I do maths, including some geometry, topology and functional analysis.
So cannot run from physics application la.
PDEs, Tensors, Hilbert/Banach Spaces...mostly QM related material
Sometimes it's very hard tho, makes me wanna krai

Can't do physics papers because they have like 3-hour labs, NOT FUN.
Unfortunately don't have physics friends to talk to about all this stuff(no maths friends either lol)
Well...malaysian friends anyway.
befitozi
post Jul 5 2009, 12:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(ninty @ Jul 4 2009, 06:47 PM)
Wah, very hard to find malaysians who like this stuff

I don't take physics, but I'm interested in it.
I do maths, including some geometry, topology and functional analysis.
So cannot run from physics application la.
PDEs, Tensors, Hilbert/Banach Spaces...mostly QM related material
Sometimes it's very hard tho, makes me wanna krai

Can't do physics papers because they have like 3-hour labs, NOT FUN.
Unfortunately don't have physics friends to talk to about all this stuff(no maths friends either lol)
Well...malaysian friends anyway.
*
Well depends on what you do in the 3-hour labs. I personally enjoyed the 3-hours labs of physics in my engineering course in monash university.

This would be a good place to discuss physics, this thread in particular. As it focuses more on the theory, it doesn't really stray afar compared to other threads that were in this section.
bboycs
post Jul 15 2009, 10:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


Sorry..i am facing problem in physic,.. hope someone can help me >>.<
Thanks
this is the question
The speed of waves in deep water depends only on the gravitational acceleration g, with dimensions and on the wavelength , with dimension L Derive an equation for the speed of wave in deep water, v .
rock4eva
post Aug 11 2009, 10:33 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: May 2009


Hi everybody !

It's so nice to see REAL physics alive and kicking ! With that, I meant hot physics stuffs such as relativistic and quantum stuffs, cosmology, ....those modern physics stuffs that we don't learn in school !

Unfortunately, like what have been mentioned earlier, physics were not given its due coverage in Malaysia. Every year, corporate companies bring in Nobel Laureates to give talk...but in what field ? Economy, Peace etc....but not Physics !!! The only one or two which ever made public was Stephen Hawking's talk and the one given by Jocelyn Bell Burnell (my first attendance to a talk be a world famous astrophysicist)

I hope this forum can continue to grow. Keep it growing, guys and gals !
kazuka
post Aug 14 2009, 01:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: May 2006
Hi, all ! Its been months since i surf in LYN forum but only today , i found out there is an interesting section in here. I've never thought there is a section in a forum in Malaysia.

I came to like Physics when im around 15 or 16. Well, I like to read those articles about how Physics laws are being applied in new technologies being introduced to the world.

I thought of studying Physics after SPM, but sadly due to objections from parents ( u know lah, hard to find job, and my parents always have the perception that physicists are always loner , bla bla bla) so instead, im now taking Computer Studies.

Anyways, keep up the good work of keeping this section alive. Looking forward for more topics (:

Regards.
profdrahhen
post Aug 15 2009, 12:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: UKM Bangi


which book u guys find out good for MODERN PHYSICS or QUANTUM MECHANICS??
C-Note
post Aug 15 2009, 10:40 PM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


its really sad to know that quantum physics and many other topics is only taught in postgraduate level. theres so much mysteries to what i'm currently learning now in spm level. we seriously lack exposure to practical physics in malaysia.
-Max91-
post Aug 16 2009, 01:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


Ya basically all the physics learn during secondary school is exam-orientated..juz teach u how to score..but not really try to create an interest in physics among students
bgeh
post Aug 16 2009, 02:41 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(C-Note @ Aug 15 2009, 10:40 PM)
its really sad to know that quantum physics and many other topics is only taught in postgraduate level. theres so much mysteries to what i'm currently learning now in spm level. we seriously lack exposure to practical physics in malaysia.
*
I'd argue that SPM level physics has too much of practical physics instead of theoretical ones
Cheesenium
post Aug 16 2009, 12:01 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(bgeh @ Aug 16 2009, 02:41 AM)
I'd argue that SPM level physics has too much of practical physics instead of theoretical ones
*
Agreed,but still,theoretical physics is much tougher.

Even things like fluids mechanics is too much for a high school student.I really doubt a typical high school student will know how to use Bernoulli's Equation.

Soil mechanics is just absolutely horrible. laugh.gif Whole lot more fun than usual mechanics,though.
profdrahhen
post Aug 16 2009, 01:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: UKM Bangi


QUOTE(C-Note @ Aug 15 2009, 10:40 PM)
its really sad to know that quantum physics and many other topics is only taught in postgraduate level. theres so much mysteries to what i'm currently learning now in spm level. we seriously lack exposure to practical physics in malaysia.
*
Borrow book from Uni or library and make your own study..
C-Note
post Aug 16 2009, 04:51 PM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


QUOTE(vick5821 @ Jun 23 2009, 06:11 PM)
the magnetic field overlap in U shaped?


Added on June 25, 2009, 2:34 pmIs a current carrying conductor an electromagnet? not winded with selenoid one
*
i doubt they overlap. they r basically just condensed and put nearer to each other, in other words.

i dont think so. can someone plz help to explain this ?
knight_templar
post Aug 24 2009, 04:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Hi guys I've always loved physics but after reading lots of texts and materials on it I still believe I have an incomplete understanding of the beautiful subject. However, I have taught students from form 4 right to foundation level Physics at university and I feel I definitely can identify the common problem areas for students. I also take a holistic approach to physics which simply means I teach using experiences u already have to make u understand Physics. So if any of you high school or Pre-U students have queries please don't hesitate to ask. I will help or at least point you in the right direction:)
sarcast
post Aug 31 2009, 04:04 AM

\^w^/
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: CyberWorld
OH, all Physics student here? Hi thar.. I like physics too when in SPM.. lol..
kenloh7
post Sep 14 2009, 12:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Penang


I've got a projectiles question here


A ball is thrown upward from the top of a building with an initial velocity of 70m/s at an angle of 35 degrees above the horizontal. Given that the height of the building is 65m.
Calculate the time for the ball to reach the ground.

My answer is 1.385s.

I hope that i do it right otherwise i will have my scholarship withdrawn and needed to pay an extra RM840.

Thanks for the help


-Max91-
post Sep 14 2009, 02:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


I got 9.57s wor >_< not sure mine correct a not also
Eventless
post Sep 14 2009, 03:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,643 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kenloh7 @ Sep 14 2009, 12:18 AM)
I've got a projectiles question here
A ball is thrown upward from the top of a building with an initial velocity of 70m/s at an angle of 35 degrees above the horizontal. Given that the height of the building is 65m.
Calculate the time for the ball to reach the ground.

My answer is 1.385s.

I hope that i do it right otherwise i will have my scholarship withdrawn and needed to pay an extra RM840.

Thanks for the help
*
It would be easier if you show the steps that you've used to come up with that number and what is the value for g that you have used in your calculation.

You would need to find out how high the ball will get based on the launch parameters. It's not going straight up so you will need to use trigonometry to get the vertical component of the velocity. This information will provide the time it takes for the ball to go up and stop and the additional vertical distance traveled upward from the top of the building. With the new height and the height of the building, figure out how long it takes for the ball to fall to the ground. Add the time for the ball to go up and stop and the time to fall from its new height to get the total travel time.

This post has been edited by Eventless: Sep 14 2009, 03:33 PM
kenloh7
post Sep 14 2009, 06:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(Eventless @ Sep 14 2009, 03:22 PM)
It would be easier if you show the steps that you've used to come up with that number and what is the value for g that you have used in your calculation.

You would need to find out how high the ball will get based on the launch parameters. It's not going straight up so you will need to use trigonometry to get the vertical component of the velocity. This information will provide the time it takes for the ball to go up and stop and the additional vertical distance traveled upward from the top of the building. With the new height and the height of the building, figure out how long it takes for the ball to fall to the ground. Add the time for the ball to go up and stop and the time to fall from its new height to get the total travel time.
*
actual answer is 9.57s,i did not understand the question fully ,that is y i got 1.385s

8 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0275sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:19 AM