[SOLVED] zer0hour, REFUNDED 16/11/09 
Jul 20 2009, 10:05 AM
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jul 12 2009, 10:03 AM)
Yeah, an individual T&C cannot supersede Malaysian Contract Act.
This case can be easier if zer0hour refund me while he settle with police and against the courier.
It is about the responsibility of the zer0hour as a seller. He just think that the courier slip & police report are the tickets for him to get away from refunding me, and he's wrong. Those proofs are nothing for me as the tracking code is invalid until now.
When a buyer didn't receive parcel and seller provided an invalid code and courier claimed there was no pickup, buyer considers this as a con case. And zer0hour is not less than a conman.
By the way, a Consumer Tribunal has been lodged against zer0hour, together with Cyber Crime Investigation Agency, and FOMCA.
One question, if you know his individual T&C does not comply to Malaysian Contract Act, why do you proceed with the transaction ? This case can be easier if zer0hour refund me while he settle with police and against the courier.
It is about the responsibility of the zer0hour as a seller. He just think that the courier slip & police report are the tickets for him to get away from refunding me, and he's wrong. Those proofs are nothing for me as the tracking code is invalid until now.
When a buyer didn't receive parcel and seller provided an invalid code and courier claimed there was no pickup, buyer considers this as a con case. And zer0hour is not less than a conman.
By the way, a Consumer Tribunal has been lodged against zer0hour, together with Cyber Crime Investigation Agency, and FOMCA.
You proceed with the transaction because you AGREE with his personal T&C and willing to take the risk, right ?
Quote
0.0134sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled