» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V27!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V27!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
Vintage Camera
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 01:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 01:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(albnok @ Jun 5 2009, 01:38 AM) tanjq87, the Brownie was probably using 127 film (very similiar in form to 120 film). However 127 film doesn't exist anymore as Kodak was the only one who made it in that size. They liked making proprietary film formats. lol, albert, you're walking camera encyclopedia man....haha I wasn't even sure if it's a medium format, you pulak point out it uses 127 film =.= salute |
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 02:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
If I don't use flash, what white balance setting should I use if I have to go back and fourth from tungsten lit area to fluorescent lit area?
Sometimes I find the colour under tungsten lit area is too saturated eventhough the saturation level is 0, is it because of the white balance issue? This post has been edited by tanjq87: Jun 5 2009, 02:28 AM |
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 02:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
everytime also have to change? as in in tungsten lit room use 1 setting, fluorescent lit room use another setting?
|
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2009, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jun 5 2009, 09:59 AM) alright, that means also have to pp..thanks =) |
|
|
Jun 6 2009, 01:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(albnok @ Jun 5 2009, 10:47 AM) tanjq87, the quick and lazy (but time-consuming) way is to shoot RAW and fix WB later. thanks for your reply, looks like if i dun use flash, the best way is still AWB..The more tedious way is to make use of the Auto mode, which resets everything each time you use it. Flourescent light flickers and so it's better you use a fast shutter speed and rely on the flash to light indoors. If not you get a greenish cast which is not consistent unless the shutter speed is slow enough. Try 18mm F3.5 ISO3200 with drive mode set to burst mode. Fire away in a flourescent-lit room. See what happens? Anyway, you can then set your camera to M mode with flash, with the WB set for tungsten light (anywhere between 2500-3200K). Now, turn to Auto. Notice how it changes to AWB? Now, turn to M. Notice how it remembers the WB setting earlier! So that's one quick way to switch between two "profiles". Alternatively, you could use a tungsten gel, and shoot in flourescent light at tungsten WB (but at a fast shutter speed and dark aperture to kill the flouro flicker) while using tungsten WB for tungsten light also. This doesn't require any switching modes. so sometimes if the colours were too saturated, is it because of wrong white balance? |
|
|
Jun 6 2009, 02:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
actually, i just found out that the oversaturated colour is always red, anyone got this prob?
|
|
|
Jun 6 2009, 07:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(albnok @ Jun 6 2009, 04:20 AM) tanjq87: Yes, oversaturation or 'flat colors' are due to wrong white balance. Don't use AWB on tungsten, it's baaad. I'd still suggest Auto with AWB for flourescent and quickly switch to P/A with tungsten WB for tungsten. oh ya Banzai_san: The A300 originally sold for RM2499 retail with single kit lens if I remember correctly. thanks again.. |
|
|
Jun 19 2009, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2009, 11:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(albnok @ Jun 21 2009, 02:25 AM) jimlim007: tanjq87 won another F42 from the competition on Alphanatics. So that's why he's selling his. friends around me all using nikon and canon but i don't seem to be poisoned by them, but if go to sony tt anyway, they don't have things like workshop, a dedicated official forum like 'alphanatics' and no monthly competition! so there is no reason i should jump =) alpha ftw! like.no.others. |
|
|
Jun 21 2009, 11:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2009, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2009, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
First try on macro!
C&C pls... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jun 23 2009, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2009, 04:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2009, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
For today's
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0184sec
0.87
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:13 AM |