Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LYN Official TRANSFORMERS Movie Thread: V2, Next: Transformers 3 - July 1st, 2011

views
     
alanyuppie
post Jul 5 2009, 06:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Jul 5 2009, 06:15 PM)
Just watched the movie.... got a couple of question

1. How the shard manipulate sam mind and make him become some sort of information for the whereabout of the machine?

it just do. its a science fiction. Do appreciate the fiction part of it.

2. Why are we seeing a terminator in Transformer movie? Can a transformer in any way, could actually transform into flesh and bones to mimic human? I remember they can do projection in vehicle, but terminator?

if it appears in the movie, means it can. Its a matter of whether your mind is open to such new idea or not. Original transformers from G1 series have Pretenders:- robots in human-shell.  .



3. What sam suppose to questioned what is happening to his kitchen after the shard burn through down to the lower level? Dont he feel curious? The whole house was being bought down..... dont he at least check what is actually happening that just busy himself to college?

it is established that in the first movie, when the cube touches the vending machine, it turns into robot. Same goes for the "presentation" in S7, where the energy channeled into the phone cause it to turn into robot too. Why would he bother waste time to check out the stuff he already knew?.


4. Presuming Optimus know about the fallen intention, i guess he is actually trying hard to work with human to eliminate any decep activities on earth, to prevent the revenge of the fallen. This bring to the importance of the shard which store the information? Cant they just hid it instead of sam owning it?

thats your presumption. Not until Demolishor is killed, Prime and gang doesnt know about the "fallen" nor his intention. And they sure doesnt know a tiny shard can still store so much information.


5. I cant remember correctly, but the allspark peice that panther lookalike robot stole from the military base was used to revive megatron right?

Yep.Its its another bigger piece of the allspark.



6. Why did fallen wait for so long for a whole scale attack on earth and threaten to get the location of the machine? With their capabilities seeing 3 deceps can defeat optimus? Adding fallen could be amazing. WHy wait and hid till optimus is dead?

The fallen knew only descendent of the primes can kill him. How can The fallen be amazing? your presumption again? Btw, the fallen also knew prime pwns 3 deceps before he got killed. I can also presume the fallen also kinda "scared" seeing ONE autobot can be "amazing". 


7. If i remember carefully, at the middle to the end, sam was travelling with his fox, his college mate and the old psyco man together also with bumblebee and the 2 other twins car. How they pass through the patrol with the twin car unoccupied?

since you knew transformers can project human holograms/drivers, the twins can also apply the same and maybe project a fake family sitting inside them. How can you "assume" the twin cars have no humans inside, yet "able" to pass through the checkpoint?

8.Hmm... transformer can teleport? That's new to me.

Its fiction. Teleportation is nothing for an advance robot civilisation, maybe its just a "premium" ability of high ranking transformers. Same like how Presidents and bigwigs able to fly everywhere using planes, while we humans need to pay and book tickets to fly on special occasions. G1 transformers series also featured decepticon with teleporting ability, like Skywarp, one of the seekers


9. Knowledge is in sam head, but all i see is the tips from the old transformer robot and some astrology knowledge that lead them to the matrix. So even deceps got their hand on sam, they might not know the machine and matric location as well right?

They got the "doctor" that is able to squeeze the info out from Sams head. Are you sleeping during the scene where Sam got kidnapped and halfway being "diagnosed" by the Doctor before the autobots crashed in just in time?


10. Matrix key was in dust, then reform, why must it make it in dust at the first place? Its look really weird.

It turn to dust so simple-minded people can feel its 'useless". but Sam use his instincts and knew there's more to it. he scooped it into his sock. Its only WEIRD because your are not willing to accept such new idea. The idea is... not anyone can simply find, and then own/hold the matrix. they must do something "great" to gain the matrix and use it,literally. I think the dust is nothing (just for show show), even if Sam didnt carry the dust.. if only he does sacrifice for the autobot's cause, the matrix might magically appear for him again in a physical form.

11. Sam come back to live? Why? Dont tell me to continue with the story?

Why cant he comes to life? because its impossible from humans point of view in their earthly believes/thinking/religion? Think out of the world please. We're seeing a movie involving interplanetary aliens.


12. Anyone can tell me why the person in charge of an aircraft carrier with a devastating secret weapon would listen to some nobody who been kick out from the military and fire at his order?

The secret weapon is so secret that on few people knows about it. Simmons do, and blurted  it out. Im sure the aircraft carrier knew how critical is the situation with the decepticons attacking here and there. Do they have a choice?


13. Can they just use the same weapon to destroy the machine or they one got one bullet? Why wait for optimus to do it?

Wait? huh? Did you actually saw a scene where all of the humams (army) .. cross their legs and arms and said "hhmm.. ok. we give up. let autobots take it from here. We wait" ? LOL. Why do you keeps presuming the stuff that cant be proven?

The weapon needs time to recharge. They have no choice again, and might attack through other means. At the same time, the autobots do their part too. It's only coincidence Jettimus prime able to take down the sun harvester before the humans do.




14. The fallen look very stronge with his telekinesis power that can make an AOE lifting of all the vehicle and drop them down at ease. Why Optimus kill him so easily? Like no fight at all.

I also cringe at the short battle. But the movie already hitting 2 hour when this happened. Since Prime is the great lead of autobot, vs the great powerful Fallen... I wonder if any typical viewers would mind if additional 1 hour is allocated to see them battle.

15. The fallen, starscream and megatron cant take on the mildly recovered but upgraded optimus prime? Weird. I expect, at least a good fight.


this is arguable. How do you know prime is mildy recovered? The allspark revived megatron and he is in his peak and powerful speeding up from seabed and hitting the submarine,then flew to outer space, just like a rebirth + greater power. The matrix of leadership revived prime. Even though he doesnt behave like "OMG look at me.. Im very strong and powerful. lemme test my firepower/kicks /punches heehaa!" after he awoken, doesnt mean the energy inside him = "mild". Dont compare sentient robots "recovery method" = sick humans just ate medicine and feeling a bit "better". Please think out of the box.




I got lot more, but so far, this is the most blur senarios i encounter.

The scenario is blur coz ur absortion method is weak. Try improve your memory and attention next time


Fun movie, but not great.
*
This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 5 2009, 06:21 PM
alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 11:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(The Rated R Superstar @ Jul 6 2009, 11:50 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


We the TFers need more people like you to teach others a lesson!! haha way to go !!
*
I LOLed at the border checkpoint "problem" he mentioned. After I responded I OMGed the whole nite to find out some viewers DO need to be spoonfed that deep.

imagine this scene in a typical movie:

scene 1: Ali is eating rice on the dining table
scene 2: Ali is on the couch playing PS3, and the plates washed lying next to the sink.

Common sense told us that Ali might have washed the plate and then proceed to play his PS3. But there exist SOME viewers who might asked "Wow... how did Ali managed to end up playing the PS3. Who washed the plates for him? I don't see his parents around!"

Common sense also let us know Ali has hands and legs and is a typical boy who is ABLE to do housechores with no difficulty. There need not be extra boring scenes on Ali doing his dishes.

This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 6 2009, 11:19 AM
alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(The Hardest Thing In The World @ Jul 6 2009, 12:24 PM)
Exactly, you just pointed out how ridiculous those questions are, and to think the original poster took the time to post it up here. For what, may I ask?
*
The beauty in many movies is that it teaches something new. From TF2 , I never know whats a railgun and its weakness and all. Typical audience wanted to be made known of it so that they wanted complete understanding with no doubts whatsoever by the movie itself, within the limited duration of 2 hours +/- 30 minutes.

Since we're NOT watching 24, I bet the battle scenes between the bots and decepts last longer than 1 hour (but only condensed to less than 30 min). Some audience even question how easy for the deceps to be killed in such short "time". thats movie-watcher-time, NOT the exast timeline in the movie itself.


In most movies involve church wedding, we see it happened and ended in less than 15 minute (with main focus on bride and groom on the altar , ready for their vows). In a real church wedding I been to, I sat there for 2 hours ++ before the groom finally kiss the bride. I dont "impose" this kinda of thinking and criticise wedding scenes in movies are "misleading" coz it doesnt "show all".


alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 11:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(The Hardest Thing In The World @ Jul 6 2009, 12:39 PM)
Yes, yes  I agree with that as stated before. My question was why did you post those questions/answers up, did you take it from somewhere or did you come up with those questions yourself so you can give those "smart" answers?
*
I didnt come up with the questions. I merely responded to jenniferjen inside her qoute box. its tedius if each and every question must be reqouted in a new box . There are 1 or 2 explanations which I was enlightened by other forumers as well, like the railgun which I never knew has a "recharging" period.


alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 02:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(Lowyat @ Jul 6 2009, 03:29 PM)
Since so many Q & A session here, i also need to ask one question:

Why Megatron only kill Optimus Prime but not to destroy or explore in the battle?
*
You can ask Megatron if you managed to locate him. Sometimes we try to be in the shoes of every single character in the movie, as if we make better judgement and better "ways" in handling the situation, and we all are just the audience sitting comfortably in the cinema, who will never "feel" what the characters inside felt.

If I'm Sam in the movie, I would've check myself in a nuthouse after being chased by the cons again and again.
If I'm megatron, I become/pretend more diplomatic and try cooperate with Prime (since he has "good links" with humans/army) to share earth resource while giving them some of the transformers weapons technology. Maybe I start my evil scheme 100 years later when the humans trust us.

If I'm xxx I will do YYY and ZZZ
.......... (yawns)

I think I'm better off become a director than a moviegoer.

its like going to buy a durian and criticise it as... smelly, I want durian to be smell good. The color not nice, why cant durian be blue instead? In the end... I end up tasting and eating it like nobody's business.






alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 05:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 6 2009, 05:54 PM)
dilly daly is all you do dont you n00B13? i figured as much
*
LOL. shudnt even take him seriously in the first place. Sounds like a "batu api" in real life. never consistent. Almost like wanted to be with "the right crowd" at the expense of not using his brain. That;s why we gets only 1 or 2-liners from him. Anything more than a paragraph from us (defenders or haters).... he starts putting labels on us.



alanyuppie
post Jul 6 2009, 06:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(ZeneticX @ Jul 6 2009, 06:45 PM)
although full of toilet jokes...but guys gotta admit it made the whole theater laugh rite?me,my friends and ppls around us laughed.although some jokes are really not necessary,and i gotta admit it went too far,but still it hlped cheer us up a bit

jz my 2 cents.dn shoot me tongue.gif

well unless some or many who are expecting this to be some serious movie
*
Deep down it all depends on how you wish to be entertained. Bashers and supporters mostly have valid points. I myself oso whined about a few glaring anomalies , but thats my personal view (it might be tiny in other people's point of view, and vice versa). The heated argument starts when both sides cannot accept the other's opinion and felt "lost' face. This is further aggravated by "snipers" that can't make up their mind and do personal attack on the person rather than their opinions.

MY suggesting is to take the snipers out and hang, then we continue.


alanyuppie
post Jul 7 2009, 12:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


LOL at "serious movie". its a movie based on toys made by one of the biggest toy producer on Earth. THe main intention of toy store with such "established" toyline being made into a movie is to:

1) Attract kids and attack their dads pants/wallet to buy their toys
2) Retain fanbase so they wont ran amok and kill their executives for diverting 99% from real source. These fans also are potential cashcows.

This movie is the outcome of juggling 2 of the above. Hasbro won't give a damn about it NOT being oscar material. Can a golden award/statue of a half naked human = bring more sales especially from the kids?

That is why some of you see fans as being more "contented" than typical non-fans. But labelling them as low-class and stupid reflects upon the criticiser as someone who unable to debate in a proper manner.

This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 7 2009, 12:49 PM
alanyuppie
post Jul 7 2009, 04:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(D417137 @ Jul 7 2009, 04:42 PM)
Yeah. Maybe introducing the Pretender was a bad idea. It's like they had a sudden advance in tech to be able to replicate human figure and they never really did mention how or why suddenly out of nowhere got something like this. Focus on Arcee. Bay did say he wanted to introduce female Transformers and explain how they come about didn't he ?
*
Dont think its a "sudden advancement". Its just another "type" of weapons/infiltration unit/soldier/warrior from Cybertron that might exist for nearly as long as humans do, perhaps? U r right, a bit of time to introduce her origin can be really helpful. Same goes for the female autobots.



alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 10:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


The decepticons (protoforms) doesn;t "simply" pick on a random earth city to land . The reason why some landed on Paris is to kidnap Sam's parents. Obviously when their "mission" is complete, there's no point staying in Paris... of course they head to the desert and literally dump their kidnapees there in front of Sam.

I rather the audience did some "intelligent" nitpicking like how Decepticons in (slow) construction vehicle mode able to travel to the desert so fast from Paris, rather than "what happened to them in Paris? Did the cons thrash the whole city?".

OK... additional stuff for those who "missed" the scene on how the hell the cons able to track Sam's parents down to Paris( i know eventually some would ask here... ,considering even obvious stuff being asked before).

Soundwave managed to track Sam's mom cellphone and called her up. She picked up the phone and treat it like a perverted call. This is where soundwave pinpointed their exactly location... and the protoforms landed... heading for them.







This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 9 2009, 10:53 AM
alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 11:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jul 9 2009, 12:32 PM)
And there's your reading list for the movie. Please do the necessary research before watching, and if you didn't enjoy it the first time, you can always retake the exa--I mean, rewatch the movie once you've done your homework.

laugh.gif
*
Not really.

The Fallen was introduced at the beginning of this movie. And if he have "teleportation" ability that audience cant accept, its the audience problem themselves with acceptance level like "Ooh its a robot movie, with ancient robot, fine. ..... but I refuse to accept he can teleport " . The prior readings in other materials are to supplement , and its not necessary.

In Titanic, we see Jack painted a potrait of Rose. Do audience question Jack's artistry skills like "Ohh how come the movie doesn't explain how Jack came to learn to paint, who taught him? which art school did he gone to?". Is a prequel novel required to tell of Jack's origin and his younger self, to explain all the unexplained skills he had that was highlited in the movie?

I bet the audience would gladly accept Jack's ability because as humans do ,its NOT REALLY A BIG DEAL how/where he learnt to paint prior to events in titanic movie. But this thinking is constraint within an earth-ly view.

Back to transformers, why cant an even wider view on other alien beings and their abilities be accepted? because "teleportation" is not native to humans ability (unlike painting)? because transforming robots with "unexplained" infinite amount of ammunition is absurd? Because humans judge aliens with same level (or lower) level of technological advances as them? Eg.

- If we can't have teleport technology in 2009, I WILL NEVER accept (movie on ) aliens having it in 17000BC or now.
- Our own weapons technology needs to be recharged (takes time) , refilled (with bullets etc), I find it simply "insults my intelligence" knowing of movie about aliens having BETTER AND UNEXPLAINED technology than ours. I am insulted by knowing their bullets came from thin air!! LOL

If so, I've said again, Just stick to watching earth-ly movie better. All Aliens movies are (meant to be) mind boggling and "insults" our human superiority/intelligence.

This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 9 2009, 11:51 AM
alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 12:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jul 9 2009, 12:57 PM)
Because poking ugly things with sticks is funlaugh.gif


Added on July 9, 2009, 12:00 pm

No wonder lah you love this movie so much. You think shit is delicious, because you've never eaten anything other than shit.  laugh.gif
*
One or two-liners provocation again? Thats the best you can do to respond? Pitiful.. smile.gif


alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 12:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(xin @ Jul 9 2009, 01:31 PM)
Yup, no point discussing since you made yourself an airhead when you watched the movie. Where you yourself has posted previously that only airheads would contribute to the movie. Validating you as one of them regardless any explaination given. Keep the explainations to yourself, i am done replying you since all you wanted is to bash and not discuss.
*
From reading reviews by critics on various movies, these "professional" critics have limited range of "measurement" in terms of movie's final "opinion":

shit/junk ----------- oscar-material

And we audience might have bigger range, for eg:

shit/junk -------- poor --------- average flick -------- could be better --------- must-watch ------- epic/oscar-material


WHat I found out it... some viewers join in the professional critics measurement method and directly label movies as shit. Is it really that bad until its shit-like to the lowest level? Not a single redeeming value? not even "poor" ? Or its just a "join bandwagon" thingy coz of "we wanted to be in the hip group" or "the critics have spoken. so shit it shall be" ?

I personally think the TF2 entertains (me), but not till the must-watch level. just "could be better". I do nitpick on its plotholes, among others. But throughout the course of discussion, the word "shit" and lowest level of movie rating denomination are posted, some without even elaborating much. If elaborate also , its always the few gripping items that seemingly spoil the rating. It like judging a hot supermodel as "shit" because she has a few obvious moles on her arms and legs, without paying regard to her face/body/posture. its like -90% on moles, and 5% point each on the rest.

The CGI and action for TF2 looks good though (not exceptional), maybe I didnt "watch" the movie inspecting each and every frame to see which CGI renders didnt match the real life background.

Whats most saddening is .... those who opined the movie as shitty, started to insults the rest with personal attacks.









alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 01:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 9 2009, 01:37 PM)
When I watch transformers, I don't really care how come it travel so fast. I can accept all this. Only
nitpicker like you will nitpick over such small matter.

But real critics will talk about how some lame joke/unnecessary plot spoil the overall experience
of the film.

After so many things being said, I really disappointed at you for not able to give a proper rebuttal to support such a shitty film.
*
Yes. I nitpick the stuff that matters to me, which doesnt matter to you. Same goes vice-versa. You think its shitty because some plot doesnt make sense with lame jokes. It matters to me too, but NOT that much. I still enjoy it in a different angle like the battling robots. You're not wrong, and Im not either.

You shudn't be dissapointed. ANy kind of rebuttal wont satisfy critics, coz its mere personal opinion by me, which is DEFINITELY wont be accepted by all.

Critics are adult humans. They're mislead by the huge marketing campaign and think its a "serious epic movie" . but we all know its still a movie is based on Toys and with the blessing of the toy company, which in the end, wanted the movie as a vehicle to sell more toys rather than win an oscar for it. To do so, it has to appeal to kids, not adult critics .





alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 01:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 9 2009, 02:08 PM)

FYI, as adult, we don't laugh at lame/unnecessary joke unless you deserve lame joke. Which means, low quality audience deserve low
quality film.
*
That is why it has poor ratings among critics. And its rated "low quality" by many adult audience because you've said it before, lame joke/plot. But then again, thats from the adult-audience demographic. Maybe kids love it. and those kids might rate it as "better quality" .

Just because adults made proper/better decisions, doesnt mean kids does not have a say in judging a movie is good or not from their point of view. Well some adults TF fans label TF2 movie as crappy merely because its lacking some "fan element" they favored. But its their opinion and just like ours, its to each his own.

We can't satisfy everybody from all demographic.

I understand you tried to look at it as a adult perspective because you're a adult. That's rigid. Just because we are adults, do we communicate/behave like adults when treating EVERYONE,EVERYTHING?

I only put my shoes in a kid's perspective tried to see things from their point of view, and I still retain my adult-annoying-habit of nitpicking the plot (which suprised me because you don't care about my nitpicks, but you care about the poor plot, which contains some of the nitpicks smile.gif



alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 01:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 9 2009, 02:29 PM)
If you said from kids point of view the movie is nice, of course it is. Even lame joke is suitable for kids. When those lame jokes
come out, I said to myself, "Only kids will laugh".

*
U r dead wrong. I've watched TF2 twice. In both occasions, I admit I laughed at the lame jokes, and the whole cinema (with half of them adults) laughed too. Yep, suddenly those adults are "kids".

Again, I dont know why you so "dissapointed" about. We can accept how you called its shitty, because your points and personal opinions are valid.

Why you so "emo" and felt "dissapointed" at differing opinions by some of us? Why would me, thinking in my own perspective, rated it DIFFERENTLY from yours, make you dissapointed? In the end, I dunt care if you dont enjoy it . You just bring youself more -ve feeling by being "dissapointed" and seems like hell-bent of wanting the rest of us to agree with you.

I;m just glad I enjoy the movie albeit its flaws. smile.gif

This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Jul 9 2009, 01:41 PM
alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 02:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 9 2009, 02:55 PM)

(About why adult laugh at lame joke, some people just laugh at everything. That's why low quality audience deserve
low quality joke/movie. )
*
Well, low quality or not, thats your own point of view. and I gladly accept that POV smile.gif

Laughing is good for health. being critical is fine too, but I think I leave that to more serious matter like work/health/environment/family which involves my life in reality. As for entertainment/movies, I wont equip my "critical" ammunition and go all out in hitting the target. That is my definition of "high quality":- we make the best of what we paid for, and no matter how many flaws in the movie.. we try out very best to enjoy its +ve moments. As for TF2 ,I found myself having do so.... really overcamed its few minor lame jokes scenes, and awed at the battle scenes that lasted much longer than the lame-jokes scene.

Same like eating a durian. If you complain smelly or hurt your finger from its thorns, you can said... "low quality fruit-lover deserve low-quality fruit". You havent even bothered to reach the stage to open up that durian (after hurting yourself/stuffing your nose). Other people might enjoy eating it already. "I am dissapointed in you for eating that durian!" LOL.


btw: I'm not a fan of durian (but doesnt meant I cant be in the shoes of durian lover!). Its all about acceptance different point of view and trying to be in their shoes, regardless of durian liking/age-group.









alanyuppie
post Jul 9 2009, 02:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


The reason why starscream has such body is because he is a jet plane, and the designers doesnt want him to overly tall compared to the rest of the bots. So they distribute his mass horizontally (aka wider and tri-obese)

If starcream really did transform into a humaniod upright shape, he will be much taller than Optimus and even Megatron. Kinda intimidating.
alanyuppie
post Jul 14 2009, 09:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(LeoLilieno @ Jul 14 2009, 10:01 AM)
I watched it only last week. To be honest, its too long and the sequence is everywhere that make the entire movie disoriented. Robot fight is great but dont you think they should make The Fallen a bit stronger so that his fight with optimus can be more intense? Having said those, i still enjoy the movie.
*
The fallen gives me an impression of a lazy slob/schemer ,yet intelligent and sly. Like a bony Julius Caesar. For the last 17k years, he has been "waiting" . I wonder during this period, if he did anything to enhance his fighting ability or not, besides sitting on his "massage-chair", giving out orders to other decepticons.




alanyuppie
post Jul 14 2009, 03:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 14 2009, 03:37 PM)
since you like TF2, we all know you hated watchmen. You don't have to say it also we know la.
We know that you watch movie because of action only. No story nevermind. [B]Once again, you
proof yourself to be not worthy of great film
. Low quality audience deserve low quality movie[/B].
Please do not come in to prove yourself to be such again and again. I'm deeply disturbed by
low quality film and you're partly the reason to be blame for all the mindless action flick in the
world today
. Shooooooo


Added on July 14, 2009, 2:45 pmpeople say its action flick and u go and watch...wth...
*
It baffles me why you keep attacking people's personal taste on movies. Just accept and move on, dude.

Different people different taste. We have the rights to dislike the movie you define as epic and great, and vice versa.

Do we need to bow to you and praise you for your uber "great" taste in movies and learn to appreciate movies like the way you do?




3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0207sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:34 PM