QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
Burnout Paradise didnt have any weather effects when it first release to the consoles.Full day and night cycle,plus,weather effects were added in a DLC after a few months.Bikes were also added to the game in another free DLC.
Yes, Burnout Paradise is one of the shining examples of DLC done right, but c'mon... Its not much different. The weather and day/night cycles are pretty shallow changes (Rain doesn't actually affect your handling or visibility THAT much) and the bikes are very tacked on (Just solo races and nothing more).
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
The Director does seem to have heaps of new feature,but releasing a sequel now is not a good idea at all.Considering it's a multiplayer game,as the new sequel will have a big impact on the community and fracture the current community.Besides,the sequel contradicts with Valve's promise to support the game for long term.Where are the L4D1 DLC? There are only 1.
Valve breaks promise... Sorry to disappoint you dude, but that's happened before, so no need to act all outraged anymore. At the end of the day they're a business and they need to make money. If you don't approve of this sequel, don't buy it. Trying to make a corporation feel guilty is like trying to make a bear feel guilty for mauling you.
As for DLC, its actually in line with the DLC release schedule for TF2 when it came out.
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
It could be a worthy sequel if they actually put more time in it by delaying it for another 1-2 years,as more features are added as time goes by to the sequel and more time to polish it.There is nothing to do with the Valvetime or Blizzard's "When It's Done" .It's just that,from past experience,if a devs rush out a sequel too fast,the sequel is gonna be shit.Whether it's full of bugs,or not enough new features.Games are getting more and more complicated these days,while the expectations from gamers are getting higher,i really dont see why L4D2 shouldnt be delayed as time is needed to make a worthy sequel.I rather see the new Director and heaps of new features in L4D2 than what is in the current one.The current L4d2 sound like a half assed sequel to me.
So you're assuming that since its this soon, it MUST be buggy and unfinished.
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
This is no different than CoD is releasing every year.Thank gawd,Infinity Ward renamed the sequel of CoD4.
Yes, because renaming it makes it all better... So if this was called "Right 2 Live: Not L4D 2", you'd be first in line to get it?
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 3 2009, 09:41 AM)
If they keep the community busy with a few DLC,while develop L4D2 for a longer period.It would be a win win situation for the community and Valve.
How is this a win-win situation actually? That just means the COMMUNITY wins.
Their reasoning behind TF2's free updates is that the free weekends often result in a sales surge and the continued life of the community promotes sales over a long period of time. This does NOT mean the same will apply for other games. Who's to say L4D managed to do the same with the Survival pack patch? Maybe it was so lackluster and Valve are forced to do this? Nobody knows really. It is incredibly daft to assume that since TF2 did it and succeeded, therefore EVERYTHING else should succeed as well.