Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Subwoofer Thread v2, Everything you need to know about bass!

views
     
anfieldude
post Sep 29 2009, 10:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Sep 29 2009, 10:52 PM)
hehehe.... tested with transformers.... was too overpowering & loud so I had to turn down the volume on sub to 50% (was 100%) tongue.gif

still i don't think my plaster ceiling adapts well to it.. haha.. sound was ok.. i feel like it can go much more if the room permits. There were scenes where the explosions scared me & i feel a little deaf afterwards.

Definitely has room for improvement....

Then i put in my David Foster BD and this is where the submersive shines.. I just love it's musicality wub.gif tight, responsive, effortless bass... my my ... wonder how much I can improve it via calibration smile.gif

Bad news is, there's a slight hum when everything's on but quiet... can't hear it from sitting position but noticable when u go near the submersive sad.gif hope this can be fixed.... bro anfieldude .. where r u? tongue.gif


Added on September 29, 2009, 10:55 pm
hi bro... if u guys willing to make the trip, my doors r definitely open rclxms.gif
*
Good stuff man! Subwoofer hum, as mpwy says, u either need to get a better shielded cable or change the power outlet, not too many options there....

100% vol, ur crazy man! Will be back Friday, will call u.
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 09:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(ronnt88 @ Sep 30 2009, 09:06 AM)
thanks wink.gif

tested kungpow panda tongue.gif

the final 'skadoosh' scene was excellent... it closed my eyes a bit tongue.gif the submersive handled the movie effortlessly at close to reference. The best part, absolutely no boominess rclxms.gif

oops... already 9.05am?? better go take a shower & start preparing for work.. tongue.gif
*
Bro,

Finally u achieved bass nirvana..Can't wait to check it out this weekend.
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 09:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(htkaki @ Sep 30 2009, 09:49 AM)
Recommand quickie this logit85 to. Loud BOOM BOOM sure for 1.

ronnt88 and anfieldude, when I am in PG, am I welcome to your homes?
*
Welcome , welcome....anytime.
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 02:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jchong @ Sep 30 2009, 02:50 PM)
Hey ronn, your place now become bass mecca... all of us want to make pilgrimage there... smile.gif


Added on September 30, 2009, 2:51 pm

When you say 'close to reference' you mean the volume on your AVR near to 0 dB?
*
I believe he means the sound coming from the sub..His previous subs could not deliver this scene. Very underwhelming even compared to the lowly IkonSub.
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 03:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jchong @ Sep 30 2009, 03:38 PM)
I imagine the Submersive is very powerful, so even if you turn down the sub volume knob the level is quite strong (hence the Audyssey sub trim is at -9 dB). This factor is quite dependent on each sub.

To me it's not crucial for the sub trim to be within +/- 3 dB. My Rythmik is on -10 dB sub trim.
*
jchong is right, as long as it is not at the lower/upper limits (Onkyo limits for subs are -12 and 12dB) it shd be ok.

ron,

I suspect its ur house. I have the Galaxy back lets try to get some REW curves done this weekend to check it out!
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 03:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(htkaki @ Sep 30 2009, 03:43 PM)
Errr.... Ikonsub that mediocre in performance?
*
I would not call it mediocre but it is a compromise for music and HT. However, I have posted some charts before, it behaves pretty well. Just not in the same class as Velos, SVS for movies and Submersive/Rythmik for music I think. Then again, my room accoustics are not too bad either. I don't have parallel walls and my ceiling extends quite high.

I believe that a lot of people confuse good clean bass as lacking compared to boomy bass. Therein lies the misconception. I also believe that many people moving from a inaccurate bass environment to a properly calibrated bass environment are going to be saying "Eh where's the bass?".

One way to compromise that is to run the lower frequencies slightly hotter (3-5dB). Typically, this is called a house curve. This will enable u to feel the bass extension from the lower frequencies thus improving ur perception. But the lower frequencies shd still be flat and they shd not linger in ur room too long.
anfieldude
post Sep 30 2009, 04:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jchong @ Sep 30 2009, 04:11 PM)
Yes, quite true. Especially if many of the peaks are flattened then they will wonder what happened. smile.gif

Thankfully in going from the 12Q to the Rythmik I didn't perceive any loss of bass. Quite the opposite, the bass is now more articulate and while it is cleaner, I don't detect any loss. If anything, there is more bass since the Rythmik extends much deeper in room compared to the 12Q.
How would you run just the lower frequencies hotter? I suppose an eq device is needed? I still need to read up on this house curve thing.
*
One simple way would be to increase the trims post Audyssey. Aim for it to be above 75dB when checked with a SPL meter.
anfieldude
post Oct 4 2009, 11:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
Submervise....Description : Powerful and Accurate.

Wow! One heck of a sub. Raw power. In ron's room, at low volumes, we were already easily hitting 106dB without any form of distortion. It would have easily topped 115dB in his room if necessary. And with no distortion...

I will try to post some charts tomorrow.

But in short, no lack of power and accuracy, I believe when he re-runs Audyssey with the tripod it will get more accurate. I did not have time to test with/without Audyssey, but will do in the next test.

Ron's room is difficult to equalize yet the sub blended in. Of course the AS-EQ1 will not hurt, the waterfall charts can use a little more taming. Or some bass traps (31.5Hz room mode pretty dominant), however, still looks impressive.

Good stuff.
anfieldude
post Oct 5 2009, 12:07 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
One thing I forgot to mention of the Submersive, it digs really low! I was getting high dBs right up till 12Hz.
anfieldude
post Oct 5 2009, 08:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 5 2009, 08:14 AM)
kaka...Logit power.....BOOM BOOM POW....tongue.gif


Added on October 5, 2009, 8:18 amWatching The Eagles Farewell Tour last night....
The kick drum and bass line were wonderful....
my surround having a bit of problem to keep up....will change the x-over to 100Hz and try if it improve the sound and the sub wont be localize-able...(the Audessey set the x-over at 140Hz sweat.gif , I think it must be due to the limitation of my surround)
But, sadly, my wife cant differentiates the different in detail and speed of the SVS compared to the Velo....she said the boom boom is still there mar...where got different? sweat.gif
*
Setting the x-over lower than Audyssey recommendations is not a good idea. Audyssey does not correct below its recommendations. Setting it higher shd be no problem.


Added on October 5, 2009, 8:36 am
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Oct 5 2009, 12:10 AM)
wow What an impressive review from anfield.
Something that's impressing him so much, must be holy good
*
I was very impressed. I believe the sub is now screaming for a bigger room. As I said, Ron's room is difficult to equalize. There are a lot of reflections, thus the sub does not have enuf room to exercise its large lungs....

I was especially impressed with Audyssey's correction, there was virtually no boominess that any of us could detect. Even though there is a 31Hz peak, it still performs very well.

This post has been edited by anfieldude: Oct 5 2009, 08:36 AM
anfieldude
post Oct 5 2009, 08:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(mpyw @ Oct 5 2009, 08:44 AM)
But if i set the x-over at 140Hz, the ability of the front will be wasted as audyssey wont applied playing lossless format....

maybe I'll just need to copy the EQ setting by audyssey as user setting....sweat.gif
*
The fronts are set to 140Hz post Audyssey? That does not sound right...I cannot recall which fronts u have but I believe if it is a floorstander, then something is amiss. Might need to re-run Audyssey.
anfieldude
post Oct 5 2009, 06:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
Ron's Submersive curves.
(with Ron's permission)

These are preliminary frequency curves that I took yesterday. I just took some basic measurements and it was done with the RS SPL Meter coz I forgot to bring my connector for the Galaxy CM-140. Will redo and play around with the crossovers to see if I can improve on this. Also this was all with Audyssey only and based on the curves I believe Ron can run the Audyssey again with the tripod for better results (since these results were based on Audyssey mic on the chair which is not correct)

1st chart : This is at reference 75dB. Pretty decent results. Room node of 31.5Hz present. Again need to check this post Audyssey again.
user posted image

2nd chart : Ron's room is pretty difficult and probably needs to be redone after Audyssey. If still not able might need an AS-EQ1 one to improve on this. His lower frequencies barely settle down at 300ms. In fact they linger around for as long as 1s. In fact at 16Hz there is a pickup after 300ms that u cannot see. I believe I need to redo this with the Galaxy. I also believe this will improve after 2nd round of Audyssey. If this cannot be corrected, then a AS-EQ1 is necessary for further accuracy.
user posted image

3rd chart: With the volume on AVR turned slightly up only, as I said, easily will hit 110dB with almost no distortion
user posted image

Its a giant sub and if there is flexibility in placement I believe we could make it even better. Will post the new results once its done.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 09:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(ar188 @ Oct 5 2009, 11:51 PM)
bos, this chart, is it possible to make the Z axis until 1000ms ? (current max from 0-300ms only)

cos still lots of low Hz bass lingering after 300ms..

I think need EQ1 to test test.. (ask maxx to pinjam 1 unit..  biggrin.gif )
*
ar188,

Yes I actually did it but did not post. As I said, there are some weird things happening after 300ms - 700ms. Will do it tonight.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 09:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 6 2009, 12:16 AM)
Kind of sad (IMHO) but boils down to personal preference  smile.gif

Next time, (if I am loaded enough) will get 2 rooms at KLIAV show. 1st room - for the real enthusiasts in AQ. 2nd room - bass heads  tongue.gif  Plonked in 13-Ultra in those hotel room. Set it to run hot at +3dB and crank the volume to abt 5dB shy of reference level. I bet next rooms will be feeling the tremors since it oculd hit 103dB with ease laugh.gif . Sure very laku one  biggrin.gif
*
htkaki,

Don't worry too much abt people. Individual preferences vary too much. A lot of people like it when the bass is set super heavy and as ar188 said artificially boosted contrasts with washed up blacks and inaccurate colours. Thats how the world is.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 09:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(ycs @ Oct 6 2009, 09:34 AM)
wondering if the EQ1 can tackle time domain problems i.e. room mode issues?
*
ycs,
I believe Audyssey does its correction that includes time domain.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 09:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(hsiengloong @ Oct 6 2009, 09:36 AM)
Hi Anfieldude,

I read back your post and u said that putting d Audyssey mic on chair is not the right way and we should put a tripod..

I've been putting the mic on my chair all this while as my AVR didnt come with a tripod... What is the difference between with and without using a tripod?
*
Vibrations induced by the chair surface since the mic is not bolted down. The tripod is normally designed to reduce vibrations. The best way would be to use a mic boom that is on the floor.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 10:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(hsiengloong @ Oct 6 2009, 09:54 AM)
Thanks bros...

Yeap, i think i better study that Audyssey manual again.. I read it through briefly bout 2 months back...

BTW, anfieldude, i tried running Audyssey again last nite on 3 positions (Multi EQxt).. This time, the results were far worse. Sub was set to -14db, center to -3db, floorstanders -6db... I forgot bout my surr...

I was so pissed off (wasted my time again) that i set all back to 0 but sub to +3db..tongue.gif
*
Ur sub has a AutoEQ right? U might want to check how to incorporate the EQ from u sub with Audyssey. I remember reading somewhere abt Velo's AutoEQ on the sub and the Audyssey problems.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 11:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(hsiengloong @ Oct 6 2009, 10:16 AM)
Alrites.. Actuallly i ran my sub's EQ 2 weeks back dy... How to incorporate the both, i shall read up more..

BTW, another noob question, Audyseey calculates each individual speaker's distance.. What difference in sound if the distance were, for instance:

1. Audyssey calculates the speaker @ 8ft when my seating position is approx 12 ft

2. Audyssey calculates the speaker @ 16ft when my seating position is approx 12 ft

Is there any difference in sound for both the above scenario?

Thanks
*
Yes there is a difference.

If Audyssey is calculating more than actual, this indicates that the signals are arriving at the primary seating position before the rest of the speakers. So in essence it adds distance to incorporate a delay.

However, if it reporting less than actual, it is indicating a possible problem. It cannot make the signals come any faster, since it can only incorporate a delay, need to re-check setup and calibration.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 11:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(hsiengloong @ Oct 6 2009, 11:22 AM)
Mine is calculating more than actual... For sub, i ready the Audysssey manual and that can be caused by the corssover setting.. But for speakers?

Also, other than delay, what other effects is have on the sound stage? My distance calculated were imbalanced i.e. left spk 9 ft, right spk 11 ft and in the end, the sound came mostly from my right speaker...

Question is, will it give a wider soundstage if i set the distance more than actual..
*
More is ok, it is incorporating a delay.

Imbalanced, need to check setup, are they symetrical? Is one closer to a wall? Or furniture? Sound coming out more, could be the trims not being accurate or some reflections.

It will not give wider soundstage by adding distance.
anfieldude
post Oct 6 2009, 11:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(htkaki @ Oct 6 2009, 11:33 AM)
No prob  wink.gif  Now, busy calculating the orders as I do not want any shortage in next shipment. Else, it would be after CNY in 2010.

On EQ1, I better courier it up to you guys, esp you (anfieldude since we share almost same idea) to test out. The catch is that you need to courier it back to me. Is that ok? smile.gif
*
htkaki,

I'm ok with it, but I'm note sure if Ron can live with that poison! smile.gif Will PM u to talk abt something in that lines.

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0530sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 02:33 AM