sorry.. typo..wedding pics..and landscape mostly i do hdr..so can edit kaw2 without loss of quality

the prob with raw is that it takes a lot of space in my HDD..so later if got time need to final edit most of the raw files and save in jpeg..

no need wonder next two years..just wonder what size RAW could be produced by D3x are..

whattt??? 60mb? if edit in capture nx, that will include the original file size and cached...must be over 100mb for sure..

oh.. never knew what those things look like..

but saw a nikon film scanner..not sure if it's largeformat la..but the physical size of it is small..can easily connect to computer..

for me i need the flexibility of having the extra megapixels because i need to crop quite a lot for some pics and still have the quality for large sized printing..so i went for d60.

so u gonna get what?

guys...can d60 support nikon old MF lenses?

i think it's okay but need to make sure that you dont suddenly take it outside because the heat could create condensation or something la..thats what i think..

if ai lens mount on d80 can it AF? i know AF lenses can af on d80 body but ai older right?

d5000 dont have in body af motor.

d40/d40x/d60/d5000 all dont have..others like d80, d90 all have.

where did u buy it?

yup.. sony a700, canon 40D, d90, d200 in mind

all about same price for body only.

40D and D200
+magnesium alloy body
+much comfortable grip
-heavier
-older models so function wise loose to newer models

pening kepala already.. a700 off my list so left 3.

---

Added on June 29, 2009, 8:32 pmwaa..everybody buy at that place ka? bought all my stuff at that shop too la.. my d60, flash,tammy etc..

if im gonna buy my d90 where do u suggest i should buy at?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 29 2009, 08:32 PM

just a bit better ...if compare 40D with D90, now that's a headache.. 40D's 6.5fps & tough magnesium alloy weatherproof body OR D90's high iso performance & tonnes of in camera features...

and furthermore, a lot of people both use 40D and D90...both are awesome for the same price range..

---

Added on June 30, 2009, 12:53 amwhy better d80 than d200?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 30 2009, 12:53 AM

afaik d200 is better than d80 too..both body design and performance.

heck that's y it's more expensive..

got one time need to shoot in rainy conditions..but as with any dslr, anybody will try to avoid that kind of situation right..

looked at canon lenses...most of nikon's lenses start at 18mm like 18-55, 18-105, 18-135, 18-70 whereas canon mostly starts at 24 or 28mm..not wide enough for me.. even the same mfd lenses, the canon starts at 24/28mm...so it wont be as wide as a 18mm, so lens wise canon's are not so versatile..

though 10mp 40D will have a wider view than 12mp d90 at the same focal length because of the 40d's lower resolution..

picture output can easily say d90 has the same output as d300's.

main difference
- price around rm1.6k difference
- d300 got weather sealed magnesium alloy body
- d300 physically bigger & better grip and d90 smaller/lighter

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d90.htm

well.. yeah myb im wrong about that..dont know about that but saw comparisons and the 40D pics is a bit wider..

at the same distance, the kit 40D 18-55 IS also proves to get much wider pics than 18-105VR because shorter mfd.

nice if i could have 1685VR..

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 30 2009, 08:25 AM

maybe the pic was taken at diff positions la kot..and not at the same.

---

Added on June 30, 2009, 9:40 amthen what lens do u suggest? 70-200VR?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Jun 30 2009, 09:40 AM

yeah..feel kinda left out with the 3 point af.. canon 1000D and a200/a300 has much more af points...kalau d60 have like 7-11 af points..i guess i wont be changing body la..