Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Fallacy about long fund, hedge fund & fund manager, 90% fund managers do worst than you!

views
     
TSrockcrawler
post May 7 2009, 09:01 PM, updated 17y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


1. Long funds are passively killed in the market in bear market but cant outperform in bull market because they are followers and inability to realized the profit.

2. Hedge funds are even worst since more than 90% hedge funds managers do not have clear concept on "hedge", they simply don't know how to make money in bear market. However, hedge fund managers are usually too short sighted. They like to take profit too early, so they may not be able to earn the biggest in the bull market.

3. Fund managers are only employees, earning salary/bonus every month and year. The money in the fund is not belong to them. So THEY CARE ABOUT LOSING AT ALL. They just care winning cos this will give them big bonus. Then they will take as much as risk as possible. This happens especially in hedge fund managers.

Conclusion: I think we should not waste time to discuss funds or fund managers. I think you should just sit back at home, find some ways to improve your investment knowledge such as reading companies annual reports, books about trading. Just to try develop your own sense to look at what is happening in the business world, rather than listen to other advices. I think 85% of people are loser in the investment world, 10% can make some money (small), only 5% can win big. Try to make yourself to be that 5% and if you cant do that. Don't even bother to waste time here. Be a teacher, policeman, doctor or lawyer will be better for you.

Do you agree?
TSrockcrawler
post May 8 2009, 09:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(lwb @ May 8 2009, 09:38 PM)
agree.. most bunghulios here don't read enough on any given subject, what's more about money and investment..
*
whats bunghulios?


TSrockcrawler
post May 8 2009, 09:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(happy4ever @ May 8 2009, 12:16 AM)
If everyone can do that on their own, who's going to throw the garbage for you?

Fund managers are there to serve a niche. For the people who aren't competent to manage their own investments.
*
if i say, except for your health and families, money should be the most important to one's life, no one should disagree. I think over 90% of people are spending at least 1/3 of their lives to make money for any purpose. So i think if someone don't have the ability to invest (actually gamble to win will be more suitable) for himself, you shouldn't touch investment at all. Don't even bother to find those so called fund mgrs to help you to lose money. Just put it in bank, buy a property and work hard in your job. It's because you should take good care of your own money rather than leave it in others' hands.


Added on May 8, 2009, 9:42 pmLet me tell you how to be that 5%.

1. Under logical arguments, you can hold a different view vs. all others. It's because 90% of the people are wrong in the investment world and this also explains why only few people can win the whole in the market.

2. When you have a different view, can you not be affected by the others? What will you do when all the others, including your mum, dad, wife, children tell you are wrong? Can you neglect them at all?

3. Can you admit that you're wrong when you made mistakes? It translates into "stop-loss". i.e. can you stop loss when you make mistakes? After you stop loss, can you learn from it but forget it after?

4. In other words, can you be a robot, a machine? No emotions at all? I can tell you 90% people lose not because of losing to others, but losing to himself. You lose to yourself, your emotion, your inconsistent behaviour.

Ok, even if you can have the above qualities, i can guarantee you won't lose in the market but doesn't mean you could win big.

I will tell you the qualities to win big tomorrow.


Added on May 8, 2009, 9:44 pm
QUOTE(Icehart @ May 8 2009, 10:12 PM)
when the fund management charge 2-20% of profits yearly + entrance fees i dont know how in the world people think that they are gonna beat the market.

head i win tail you lose.
*
do you mean after they charge that fee, they cant beat the market?


Added on May 8, 2009, 9:46 pm
QUOTE(jong52yuara @ May 8 2009, 01:19 AM)
try do some survey at OSK or local stock market brokerage office.. some remisier can make you a lot of money pal..
*
Who can do that? tell me.

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 8 2009, 09:46 PM
TSrockcrawler
post May 8 2009, 10:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(kokofai @ May 8 2009, 11:17 PM)
I would say that, it varies from one another when comes to self-investment. your up-bring would lead u to how u perceive things around u. In other words, it depends on how good is your "eye-sight" in choosing an investment and how smart are u in absorbing information that are not going public so fast.

When comes to investment world, no one can really claim themselve as "GOD" <--- Warren Buffet is exceptional? (You really think so? But he made darn a lot of money. What can u say?)

I personally would say that the element of luck is also very important when comes to investment. Hedge fund managers, yes no doubt they have the knowledge and skills, but afterall it's still undeniable that if u think u can't manage ur own money, and u really wanna give it a try. Why not?

you wouldn't know how pain it is until u fall down. but it's an experience to make us a better person isn't it? smile.gif
*
Thanks!

My point is: If you dont know how to play, Dont Play! Cos it is your money, dont put your life at risk cos Money only comes in 3rd or 4th in one's life, after Family and Health.

I never think WB is a God. His existence was a legadary At His Time. It was by chance someone could also do that by given such a chance at that time, here comes WB. If you study him and his life thoroughly, he has not special wisdom and skill than the majority. To me, I adapt Soros more than WB if you want me to choose a true investor with conquer skills and intellectual to face the wave of time.

Comes to gambling, of cos, Luck is critical.


Added on May 8, 2009, 10:30 pmFirst, you said:

QUOTE(jong52yuara @ May 8 2009 @ 01:19 AM)
try do some survey at OSK or local stock market brokerage office.. some remisier can make you a lot of money pal..
Then, you said:
QUOTE(jong52yuara @ May 8 2009, 11:23 PM)
i dunno who is it and dont trade local market, but remisier at your local brokerage does help people trade and return generally is much higher than mutual/any fund. there are many remisier just walk-in there open an account and they usually will ask whether you require remisier service, they'll get commision by help you trade your money.
*
Are you alright?


This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 8 2009, 10:30 PM
TSrockcrawler
post May 8 2009, 11:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(kokofai @ May 9 2009, 12:09 AM)
But the fact is, when WB says something, everyone seems to believe in him so much. In other words, everyone treats him just like a GOD!
Yeah he might not be that good as u said, but the fact is, he made billions of billions. he's rich, he's brilliant, he's so influential.

This is a FACT. What can u do to prove that he's not good? WE CAN'T! coz... it's the fact. he's GOD. We don't have any "right" to comment on him.

yes u can...
U cannot prove him wrong until u become the world's richest man one day. smile.gif
*
WB is influential doesnt make him a God. Is Dr M our Malaysian God who has been influential to our country history in the past decades, even influenced the people, we particular, our whole life?! Dont simply mention God, the greater power. What the majority think doesnt mean it is correct, it can only be seen as a influence force, but no statement indicate that it is correct thing to do, or I should.

What i tried to share is that: Not all of his theories work or he would have been doing greater than his younger times. The reason he is 'great' now simply bcos it was from His Time as I stated earlier. Put him to us now in our time, he is not an shinny investor anymore as compare to many others.



TSrockcrawler
post May 9 2009, 12:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


You may comment, critize or praise on anything or anyone you like. It is the right of speech
TSrockcrawler
post May 9 2009, 10:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(legiwei @ May 9 2009, 01:51 AM)
From what I can see, your investment principles and views is no different from a fund manager.

I wouldn't put my trust on you either.

Your how to be in 5% group don't seem new to me. In fact, I think it's probably the very same thing from what a "financial advisor" will tell me.

So, I still cant see why I will be able to succeed under your approach, especially when you attribute investment as gambling which requires ALOT of luck.

What are the odds of DIY and beating the rest of crowd especially for a person who has no financial knowledge/background as compared to those involved in it for years.

The fallacy to me is not on the profession but the whole entire monetary systems. It was never designed to be sustainable. Introduction of complex financial derivatives or whatever structured products is only there to serve a purpose, a means for people to trade and speculate, a system that was never needed.
*
Yes, those things are known by people, very old fashioned. But can you do that? For every 10 years we will have a bear market and even you know that from history, there are still tons of people losing big. Tell me why? Cos we are all human, we make the SAME mistakes everyday, every year, every decades. Why so many people rush to buy stocks before the the market collapse? Why the turnover usually broke all the time record before the market collapse. you explain this to me?

My point is even you know what i said are correct but you still cant do that. Only 5% of people can do that and they can win big. That means you need to acting in extraordinary way. The world likes a Pyramid, only the tip is the success.
TSrockcrawler
post May 9 2009, 11:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(legiwei @ May 9 2009, 01:43 PM)
I don't get it, you are criticising the fund managers because they are treating your money like it's a game and they don't care if they were to lose at all.

And then, you make a U-turn with your "how to succeed method" + your aggresive approach which is no different from those whom you're trying to critise.

And you know, those people who are losing money are also doing the very exact same thing like you're trying to get us to do but only end up losing it big.

So, my point is, I don't see you being any different from the rest.
*
My successful methodology is not to be another fund manager to cheat other money. I mean you need to be a fund manager to manage your own money, to earn for yourself. This method is unique to anyone. Anyone cant copy your method and win the same like you. You develop your own method and can work only on yourself. Cos if you can beat yourself, then you could beat the market.
TSrockcrawler
post May 11 2009, 09:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


folks -

first, being a fund manager myself, the aim of opening this thread is trying to help out by sharing insights for those who arent, as well as trying to make friends with anyone who agrees to me.

I do not try to convince anyone to be my client as the co i work in only take in big clients. I criticize was to trying to help others who are lacking of financial skills to STOP wasting/spending money on those so-called 'fund manager' cos i live with them in my entire life, i know who they are, how they are like.

Im hoping to help anyone with interests of learning instead of stuffing food into his mouth, i prefer to teach him to fish. Thats why Im here. I hope u can read my posts again with a different pov from now on.

Once again, i believe winners are not only for genius. You first need to have your mindset in correct direction plus hardworking (try to know as many as things in the world). You still have chance to be the winner.



TSrockcrawler
post May 14 2009, 09:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


Im going to share something simple today - something can prove the method i mentioned it works and makes money.

Q1. Do you know what is the biggest consensus about the economy now?
Answer: 2nd half 2009 recovery of the global economy.

My comment: All wrong. If such a big bubble of banking bubble burst globally (especially in US and Europe) can recover after about 1.5 year (since 2008), it must be someone is joking or daydreaming. The bubble is bigger than ever in human history, bigger than tech bubble, any of those we know of.

2. Can China escape from this crisis?
No. US and Europe take over 40% GDP in the world. It is China (whole Asia indeed) to depend on US and Europe rather they need us. China will become the net importer from now on. China to import natural resources from US and Europe but at the same time exports are all dead like a dead fish. So called "World Factory" doesn't work any more. CHINA CANNOT SAVE THE WORLD, Please stop telling the joke.

3. But one thing we need to bear in mind that the market structure has changed a lot since 2000, due to the rise of internet. Traditional way of accessing to information from hard copies is an era past behind us, it is all about internet now.
The length of bear market will be shortened comparing with the past, say from 4-5 yrs to 2-3 yrs. It's because people need less time to be educated that this is a bear market as information flowing freely and quickly in internet and other media.

Conclusion: Don't lost faith upon current bear market cos IMHO the next bull market may come around 2010-2011. Hence, Now Please Sell everything on hand: stocks/real estates and buy them back around mid of 2010. Remember, not to worry too much about the downturn cos when all the people are bearish, then you take out your money under your bed and buy anything to ride the next bull.

What do you think?

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 14 2009, 09:48 PM
TSrockcrawler
post May 15 2009, 06:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


Thank you, Dreamer.

I'm sorry that the recovery may not necessarily happen in Malaysia even all the other markets do that because we have a pretty closed economy. Malaysia's edge is only oil. But oil price may not get back to over $100 level in the coming few years cos oil supply is so huge that there is no such thing of energy crisis at all.

I do agree what you said. My suggestion was meaning to try putting an eye/investment in Hong Kong and or Singapore market during 2010. We can still win big.


Added on May 15, 2009, 6:51 amI will share a real example of my trading this week:

Action: I shorted Hang Seng Index futures twice this week from 17400 and closed yesterday at 16480, gained 1000 points in 3 days.

Rationale:
1. Hong Kong mkt turnover broke HK$100bn this week since 17000, but the index met resistance at around 17400-17500. Remember high turnover is a bad sign in bear market rally, meaning people came out to sell.

2. Dont underestimate the resistance in 250 day moving average.

3. It became a low quality rally since 16000 as many bad fundamental stocks also went up huge.

Follow up:
Now waiting for rebound today and short again around 16700-16800.

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 15 2009, 06:55 AM
TSrockcrawler
post May 16 2009, 08:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(dreamer101 @ May 15 2009, 04:34 PM)
secretsquirrel,

So, tell me, what USEFUL investment information that he had shared??

My POINT which is VERY SIMPLE.  Most normal human beings are not PROFESSIONAL stock traders.  So, they NEED an investment strategy that works aka they can sleep for 5 years and it will be okay.  Anything less than that, it will require TOO MUCH monitoring and it will not work for normal people.

Dreamer
*
Hi SS,

I'm so glad that there is one can understand my meaning. Thank you very much. Tell me your thoughts.

cheers,

crawler


Added on May 16, 2009, 8:27 am
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ May 15 2009, 04:34 PM)
secretsquirrel,

So, tell me, what USEFUL investment information that he had shared??

My POINT which is VERY SIMPLE.  Most normal human beings are not PROFESSIONAL stock traders.  So, they NEED an investment strategy that works aka they can sleep for 5 years and it will be okay.  Anything less than that, it will require TOO MUCH monitoring and it will not work for normal people.

Dreamer
*
Dreamer,

You mean you believe in free lunch-Sleep tight for 5 yrs and suddenly your wealth will increase? There is high possibility that you get at least 50% lost if you don't put effort to manage your money, rather than increase.

I'm in peace without anymore fights as i do in my everyday's life, but to share as much as i could = unless you equip yourself, full armor, otherwise you should put money in bank FD, real estate rather than in the FM's hands.

rockcrawler

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 16 2009, 08:34 AM
TSrockcrawler
post May 19 2009, 08:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


Hi everyone,

keep shorting the market today......short Hang Seng Index Futures at 17400 again, big short here. Tomorrow get some big cap to ex-dividend, including HSBC. I guess this rally is the biggest and the only one in this year, everybody please fasten your seat belt. Have you prepare to see the worst in the coming few months? Have you prepare to buy when you see the worst, rather being scared your shit out?

Remember: Don't be too excited when you see the market going up crazy! Don't be scare when you see people commit suicide during the downturn of bear market! When you see blood on the street, it's time to buy crazy.

Rock


Added on May 19, 2009, 8:29 pm
QUOTE(Kinitos @ May 16 2009, 11:11 AM)
" 1. Long funds are passively killed in the market in bear market but cant outperform in bull market because they are followers and inability to realized the profit. "
Rock , all forumers here appreciate your further understanding of our statement above taking into accounts the questions below,

Unit trust fund are regulated investment fund not unregulated private trading fund.
Give us some examples of investments you personally managed that consistently outperform the bull market. How and by what measure/method it can outperform the bull market.
Explain your perception "they are followers and inability to realized the profit"
*
Yes, since they are being regulated, so are bounded by guidelines and i said in this forum that the market structure has changed to be so efficient so that the ordinary long and hedge fund managers (who are usually at least 40-50 yrs old people and they are so dump) cant adapt to the change. I worked with some old fund managers before that they keep their old way of thinking (mainly very very stubborn long bias view) and just like a deer in the headlight, do nothing in the bear market. These old fashion managers would keep at 40-50% investment actively in equities and wait to see the share prices going to toilet until 60-70% loss then stopped. I'm telling those guys that this world is no longer belong to you. It's our market, traders' market, traders with extensive knowledge to everything in the world.

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 19 2009, 08:29 PM
TSrockcrawler
post May 20 2009, 08:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(Kinitos @ May 19 2009, 11:56 PM)
In local context it's understood by default when they said unit trust fund, it's always long trust fund as locally naked short doesn't apply. Almost all trust funds are limited to the following instruments:equities,money markets,bonds. The fact that majority of the funds are  equities trusts, there are required by funds mandate/objectives to be stay invested regardless of bull or bear market in shares or warrants at least 80% - 90% of fund investable assets.

Under such senario, is it still applicable for you to said "Long funds are passively killed in the market in bear market"

Of course yes there are in a way, but these are long term investment funds and the shares in portfolio are selected based on their fundamental basis not price/volume momentum like speculators would trade.

what we would like to hear from you is how you would drive these funds performance chart flying UP instead of flying down since you disagreed with most fund managers way of doing things.
*
What i'm doing here is to show my view on the market and let everyone to justify the view/opinion. I've shared my pov in the my last post starting with sentence "Hi everyone..." I usually do things in a contradict way from last year.

Im trying to share my ideas in a blog, if there anyone interested, kindly pm me.

For anyone who Doesnt have any objections to things that i share, you do not have to response to my posts. I have no means to beat everyone in order to show that i conquer the world. Im only sharing for the good deeds of everyone, instead of gaining anything from you guys.
TSrockcrawler
post May 22 2009, 12:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(rockcrawler @ May 19 2009, 09:16 PM)
Hi everyone,

keep shorting the market today......short Hang Seng Index Futures at 17400 again, big short here.  Tomorrow get some big cap to ex-dividend, including HSBC.  I guess this rally is the biggest and the only one in this year, everybody please fasten your seat belt.  Have you prepare to see the worst in the coming few months?  Have you prepare to buy when you see the worst, rather being scared your shit out? 

Remember:  Don't be too excited when you see the market going up crazy! Don't be scare when you see people commit suicide during the downturn of bear market!  When you see blood on the street, it's time to buy crazy.

Rock



See! i'm right once again. The index is down consecutively 2 days, now trading at around 17000.

In Oct 2008, everybody rushed out and said Hang Seng Index would go to 8000. What did you do that time?

Now, everybody said HSI will go to 20,000. What will you do this time?

Tell me......

This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 22 2009, 10:44 PM
TSrockcrawler
post May 27 2009, 09:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(c0cac0la @ May 23 2009, 04:34 AM)
I am reasonably entertained by this thread, and makes me think a lot. Questions:

1) You are implying that Fund Managers are allowed and encouraged to take excessive risk, while I thought it is regulated. May be not in Malaysia, I suppose. 


I also thought it has been well regulated when i started to work in this field 15 yrs ago but found out that regulators also dont know thoroughly about hedge fund cos this concept happened since 1990s only. Try to recall the situation in US in these 2 years, you would know even US people are so pro in investment, they still cant regulate hedge fund and investment banking.

QUOTE
2) If such a fund exist, given the higher risk taken, it tends to perform worse than other funds. If we believe in market with free competition, it will lose its client much faster than others, and soon out of business. Unless it is a monopoly or oligopoly market, such a fund should be and would be short lived. Again, is this very different in Malaysia ?


high risker usually means higher returns and these funds are usually outperform in bull markets and so they should not perform worse than the other funds. By the way, investors love risk so much. If you tell someone that you could generate 5-10% only "sure win" , guaranteed.....i think not many people are interested still.

QUOTE
3) All financial institution is governed and regulated on the amount of risk they took, basic measurement such as the Greek factors, and Value At Risk calculations should be reported to the central bank regulatory. Is that not the case for Malaysia ?


i can tell you i'm quite academic when i was studying in university and i knew every single formulae in finance. However, when i really work in finance, it seems like only myself or few people remember these formulae. Of course, fund managers will not be included.

QUOTE

4) Hedge funds does not operate based on 'hedging' per se, but rather they do delta hedging using Black Sholes formula. However, there are funds that don't and still call themselves hedge fund. Is there any hedge funds in Malaysia ? Without the ability to short the market, I would imagine delta hedging is impossible.


same as my answer for question 3. 80% hedge fund managers only use long/short gross net exposure method for hedging. This gross/net method is just a simple +-x/ calculation without even using a scientific calculator. i cant imagine if we require them to use Black Scholes to calculate hedging ratio, they will switch back to work in long fund. By the way, i dont quite agree with the black scholes as it assumed normal distribution but the reality is not.

QUOTE
5) The key concept of finance is all about opportunity cost. When a person hire a fund managers and pay him for transaction brokerage fees, you mentioned it is a 'head you win, tail I lose' situation, but do not forget the person frees up his time in doing those transactions and able to use those time to earn money. Some would argue that what is important is 'Can you earn more than the brokerage if you were to do it yourself?' rather than declare that paying brokerage mutual funds is not worth it. What is your opinion on this ?


no comment....but if you have enough trading knowledge, you should get rid of fund mgrs and trade for yourself and that is the main theme of my blog here.

QUOTE
6) The same opportunity cost goes on hiring a fund manager. If one were to spend time pick up finance and investment as a subject (depends on your maths and econs foundation, it can be done in 3 months to few years), and then willing to do analysis on all companies that he is tracking (which is time consuming) and also collect and consolidate market information (super time consuming for a normal person), I see a huge amount of time and effort invested. Time, is money. I would imagine the question is back to 'How much can you earn with those time spent on other areas, such as your job?". What do you suggest ?


"time consuming for normal person".....really right and that's why normal person cant win.

QUOTE

7) Imagine a person spent all the above time and effort and now become capable of managing his own investment, his cost is probably still higher than a fund manager, because fund manager would be able to spread his cost over larger amount of transactions (and more clients), compare to the individual. Can the individual really do it more cost effective than a fund manager ?


it depends.....you could argue that trading in a fund is actually not flexible cos you need to deal with liquidity of stocks and you can even buy tiny cap stock due to illiquidity.

QUOTE

8) Assuming both can do the same efficiency and effectiveness in investment, which would also translate to the fact that the chances of success is the same. The individual can make the same mistake as the fund managers. The only difference is how risk averse is the individual. If the individual is highly risk seeking, he/she will potentially bet bigger than the fund (which should be regulated on total risk committed). So I suppose your suggestion is for investor who is highly risk averse, who would bet lesser than the fund manager and therefore lost less money should the bet turn bad. What do you think ?


kind of agree.

QUOTE
9) Given the above, I would also think you may want to consider this: If the fund manager is more prone to taking higher risk, which has higher return, it is best to engage them during the bull time. When bear market comes, just withdraw your money and put it into bond or other fixed income product. Isn't it better to make use of fund managers for what they are good at, rather than discount them completely ? Would like to hear your opinion on this.
*
you can do that.....that make sense to me. Remember that involved a great skill and knowledge to determine whether it's bull or bear. If you can do that accurately, you dont need fund mgr at all.



This post has been edited by rockcrawler: May 27 2009, 09:20 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0268sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 05:09 AM