QUOTE(ioriyagamii @ Mar 17 2010, 02:52 AM)
Wat i heard was last week, at summit.Investment Bandar Puteri Puchong
Investment Bandar Puteri Puchong
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 06:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2010, 01:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
may be the price had been increased 100k before you getting 100k freebies.
|
|
|
Mar 25 2010, 07:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
this is 2.5 semidee; let's say average using 8*2.0hp inverter ac + inst.+ wiring = 8*(2500+500+500)=28000; elec appliances (incl inst)=10000; full height cabinet 12'=12'*500=6000; kitc top=20*250=5000; kitc wall and base=25*200=5000;island=7000; sub total=61000. designer's fee 10%, sub total=67100; ioi admin charges 15%, sub total=77165; ioi's profits 25%, Grand Total = 96,500 (100,000 roundup).
|
|
|
Apr 1 2010, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
ya tats right, anyone know what's the market value of Serena based on bank valuation?
620k to 640k |
|
|
Apr 5 2010, 06:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2010, 02:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(charlesPuchong @ Apr 6 2010, 10:51 AM) if i am rich enough, sure i will buy the 2.5M bangalow at Puteri 12. great view, great air, big built out.....Money is the main concern basically design safety factor is similar for houses in ex-mining pond or ex-oil palm estate or hill side.contractor's workmanship and quality plays the important part. however for hill side houses, long term/periodically maintenance is important. This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: Apr 6 2010, 02:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2010, 07:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(diylover @ Apr 13 2010, 05:38 PM) IOI is no better that other developers. they build Skyville at the edge puchong jaya's hill, bungalos at puteri 12's slope, now the high end condo at puteri 11's slope. i saw they 'reinforced' the slope along skyville after completed building the houses. meaning that they are willing to spend money (or more important they have money) even though after completed the houses. fyi, the 'soil nail' is not cheap, one easily cost few thousands (depends on length) and i saw hundreds nos are there.for puteri12, i had invited my fren who is geotechnical expert to give comments on the slope stability at this area. his comments was +ve. no tensile stresses developed along the road at the edge of slope, no ground movement etc. as for condos at puteri11, i see no reason why they can't build them as long as they comply with all regulations and give some contributions to the surrounding communities thx, This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: Apr 15 2010, 07:07 AM |
|
|
Apr 19 2010, 07:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(HW-Racer @ Apr 18 2010, 10:35 PM) I find the roads in Bandar Puteri Puchong are very narrow.... given the number of existing commercial activities and i agree. land is expensive in bpp.also the numerous commercial projects in the pipeline... u see the Bandar Kinrara roads...very spacious even though the commercial not as much as bandar puteri puchong bk vs bpp = peaceful & quite vs busy & booming. there's a lot of pros than cons in bpp but it's unfair to state all bpp advantages over bk in bpp forum. |
|
|
Apr 22 2010, 08:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
hi,
anyone has 280Puteri@10 updates (price)? thx, |
|
|
Apr 22 2010, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2010, 06:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 10:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(Tohsan @ Apr 27 2010, 08:41 AM) ya thats exactly happen in Puteri 12, some selfish owner park all their car outside their house instead of their own car porch steady bro, look at the brighter side.narrow lane (just fit 1 car) will prevent drivers from speeding. this is better than putting humps/bumps. thx, |
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 01:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(Tohsan @ Apr 27 2010, 10:45 AM) tat will be a big problem if there is a fire, fire engine can't get thru fast enough, those car owner just take things for granted and causing unneccessary jam and problems. Added on April 27, 2010, 10:50 am a lot of them know about it,they just lazy n couldn't careless attitude is causing the problem. QUOTE(trojant @ Apr 27 2010, 10:13 AM) this is a stupid excuse.... i was not giving accuses cause i didn't simply park my cars outside. if 1 lane is so effective, then why the hell want to build 2 lanes? better put 1 lane and the extra land are reserved as parking. the road is built for 2-way traffic. by parking the road side, it forces cars from both way to a single lane which is dangerous. if you prefer your 'mood' to be 'ruined' by cursing these cars, go ahead. i would rather look at the brighter side and have good 'mood' with my family. btw, in housing area speed is the most dangeraous factor and narrow road will teach you courtesy and respect yr neighbour. This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: Apr 27 2010, 02:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 06:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(trojant @ Apr 27 2010, 02:43 PM) good for u... optimism, which also means shying away from reality. suggestion: ask those cards park outside, park exactly infront of the gate at night... positive thinking... in such case I will not fear for risk of car thieves, because the cars park outside will prevent them to drive my car away i still feel that cars park outside terrace houses are not creating nuisance, at least to me. Added on April 28, 2010, 6:53 am QUOTE(HW-Racer @ Apr 27 2010, 09:33 PM) i noticed that many malaysian household owns more than 2 cars.... so the extra car got to park someone outside (some just park 1 car ioi can't simply change the 'plot ratio', % of road & green area has to comply with regulations/by-laws.inside, the other outside)... ..really hope IOI could look into the parking problem.... eg. make road wider...make the playground field a bit smaller...so that both side can park, and also the internal main roads..wider a bit...without the kerbs... some country prefer to 'adapt' by introducing new technology while some change their regulation to adapt the increasing population. This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: Apr 28 2010, 06:53 AM |
|
|
May 4 2010, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
|
|
|
May 4 2010, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(JayC75 @ May 4 2010, 02:01 PM) I'm sure the area is sufficient. 9*80*170+32*50*110=298,400sq.ft*100/70 (assumed 30% for infra.) = 430k sq.ftfrom google, the plot is ard 520k sq.ft I just worried abt the traffic generated by this dev. will anticipated another signalised/unsignalised junction between columbia junction and signalised junction to Persiaran Puteri. This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: May 4 2010, 04:36 PM |
|
|
May 5 2010, 10:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(trojant @ May 4 2010, 04:50 PM) hmmm... surprised with ur worry worries won't 'ruin' my mood. I always tot ur optimism will lead you not to have "your 'mood' to be 'ruined' by cursing these cars, look at the brighter side and have good 'mood' with ur family" wondering where is the entrance/exit. also, if this business area is "wong", the 3-lane persiaran puteri may then be cramped to 1.5 lane due to lazy and stupid cars parking and double parking along the road side. you look like very concern abt 'parking'. this so called boutique concept won't have parking problem cause built up over land area ratio would be small. |
|
|
May 10 2010, 07:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
Puchong utama will benefit from this:
Work To Ease Congestion In Puchong Expected To End Late Next Year |
|
|
May 11 2010, 06:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(Sawyer @ May 10 2010, 01:33 PM) Well, the contra-flow has noticeably improved traffic heading into Puchong from the Sunway toll. Traffic, whether on the contra lane or on the LDP heading into Puchong, is less congested compared before. Since the contra-flow is still ongoing, Litrak must be considering it a "success". In the end though, there are just too many cars in the Klang Valley. Too many single occupancy vehicles (just look around you when you drive). Lack of public transport (LRT extension? It's 2010 and no sign of any progress). QUOTE(Tohsan @ May 10 2010, 02:04 PM) i agreed that the contra-flow has improved travelling time from sunway to puchong.too bad that this exercise has created inconveniences to residents and shop-owners on both sides of puchong jaya. they had done studies and come out the best option which may had resulted 100,000 unhappy users and 300,000 satisfied users. This post has been edited by mroys@lyn: May 11 2010, 07:32 AM |
|
|
May 12 2010, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,037 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
the project will go on.
with population around 1mil., the best way to win the heart of puchong residents is through lrt project. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0632sec
0.76
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:19 AM |