QUOTE(gapnap @ Apr 28 2009, 09:22 PM)
If you're too familiar with the song , 1 take is very possible ...
nolah , like you said . sound engineers can edit that specific part of the song . that is why you're paying for track by track recording..
imo track to track recording is alot easier than live recording..just that it cost more only
if its Live recording then 1 mistake you start all over again lah..
Oh okay,,
Then I guess I was freakin ripped off by a lousy sound engineer. The first time I ever recorded drums I remember doing like just ONE mistake-the finishing fill. The guy asked me to record the whole thing over. Then after that, I wanted to add something else to the chorus that I thought would be cool-like a fill or even adding in cowbell-he said I had to do it all over again. So I was like very WTF, cause I always see guitarists,drummers on videos record that particular part of the song they are messing up over and over again-like a guitar solo or drum intro. Instead this guy's mentality was that one single mistake or improv. a musician wanted to add at any BAR or PART of the song was immediatly a total retake.
Added on April 29, 2009, 7:06 pmQUOTE(reza.o @ Apr 29 2009, 01:16 AM)
punch in is an option....sometimes when you are too tired,burnout or you no longer 'feeling it' or the producer/engineer simply annoyed with your failure in keeping with the tempo,dynamics etc etc and decide to lay the 'knife',i dont recommend it though as the studio might charge more fee.but it is kind of easy.....ohhh one more thing are you goin to lay the drum first?or your other member have lay down the guitar,bass, etc etc?....
i am going to lay the drum track first.
Oh also I was wondering,,you know at the end of the song when drummers sometimes do a huge fill-that on face value has no tempo whatsoever? Like they'll do a 4 bar fill then like fill it with crashes,rides,double bass-basically they'll end with a huge noisy fill while the guitarists is doing a crazy finishing solo and everyone is going nuts?
Yeah,does the drummer have to follow the metronome then? I mean I hear drummers who go nuts and you know how they usually slow down at the song after doing crazy double fills then slow down slowly and the whole band waits for the final crash to end the song. So with all that havoc,does one still have to follow metronome?
Cause the last recording, I was doing this type of ending,where we had a big finish instead of a normal end to the song. So we were doin that crazy van halen style ending where all the musicians started going at it and doing flashy stuff and going to the end of the song my drums had to slow down to signal the end based on the "feel" of course, then ending with a crash(I hope you know what I'm talking about,sorry if I did not make it clear). However,I still had to follow metronome in that flashy ending. Is that normal? Like I had to literally slow down my drumming -not a constant slow tempo, but just like from fast to slow (not constructed but based on feel) to signify the stop WHILE the metronome was still going like 144.
This post has been edited by Beachkid: Apr 29 2009, 07:06 PM