thers an interview on bill n his family.even his wife n children wans/desire ipod/iphones. though those r the onli electronic devices banned from his home. lol....

but this zune seems asspple kicking
hmm... if os platform is winmo.then its a non-phone pda ady.not mp3 player.
or portable x-box + pda + ipod touch

I'll like to have one.

*out of topic*
but i js cant hold myself bk frm asking: wat happened to ur PanDA(display pic)
mine look way healthier. haha

No pra I'm neutral. In fact I think the iPhone is extremely good on lots of aspects (especially the music player, of which HTC fails to achieve nicely), but browsing is not one of them.


Opera doesn't hog RAM if you use the correct builds. WM6.5 here on a 192MB RAM Diamond, 45% idle startup, 2 tabs of Opera only bumps it to 62%. I can open up to 4 without any nuclear meltdown.

If you use only 2 tabs (which is all people need for info lookup/reference/easy C-P) I'd have to argue that Opera leads the way.

I assume your WM phone has 128/64MB of RAM. In that case, sorry, you're rather SOL (192/256 gives a radically better experience in not just Opera but a heck lot more apps too)

My rather short experience with the iPhone with Safari has been pretty bad. DeviantART, Ars Technica, and I think either Tech Report or Slashdot crashed on me. Can't blame it too much though, AFAIK the 128MB RAM still shows its limits in the end. Especially with the extra needed animations

Maybe you're right with WM 6.5 . I have not tested Opera on WM 6.5 , so I can't comment the performance on it. It may have changed. However with 6.1 , I had a horrible experience with it.

I guess we do have we do have our own tastes and preferences. I'll give WM 6.5 a shot on my old device (hopefully its flash able and it runs). I'll let you know if its faster then WM 6.1. Since you're running WM 6.5 and not to mention I've been hearing lots of good things bout WM 6.5 . I guess I'll give it a shot if it runs faster then WM 6.1 (and hopefully it does !)