P2 is not a killing paper, far from it. (F5 & P4 is the killing paper currently)
Its the transition problem but I do admit the examiner is very wicked / cunning / devious ......etc.
In F7 students can easily expect the type of question to be asked like a guarantee of
Qs 1 : Consol
Qs 2 : Published a/c
Qs 3 : Ratio / cashflow
Total : 75 marks
Qs 4 & 5 : On accounting standards (25 marks)
Okay not to brag here but I scored above 8x in F7 since qs is very direct & only time management is involved. If you can finish all question in time chances are you will get high marks.
In P2 its more on IAS / IFRS with around 50 marks instead of 25 previously. The ratio of calculation : theory is always around 45 : 55.
So students whom are very comfortable with F7 style may suffer in P2 (like me

since my marks around 5x+).
1) No more trend (qs can be consol, cashflow or even published a/c only)
2) Merge of standards (they can ask a combination of standards like Deferred tax & employee benefits together). In F7 its always the standard on its own without effect on other standards.
3) Examiner assume you already have solid foundation in F7 so qs may also asked F7 with P2 stuff.
4) Lecturer :
This will not be a problem if you stick with the same lecturer but if you change lecturer from F7 to P2 then a transition problem may occur again. All lecturer have their own methods of dealing with P2 & its not easy to accomodate or consolidate both especially when they had conflicting arguments.
But such conflict may be more relevant in tax where there is constant cases where the examiner had a differing view compared to general public.
If I am not mistaken the examiner of F7 is a student to P2 examiner.
ou ..ok thanks..
that mean i really nid to be solid in F7..
nid mark up more..
1 more thing to clarify,in P2 normally will lecturer wont be able to finish teaching the subject?or IAS?