Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V23!, The Orange Legion

views
     
SonnyCooL
post Mar 26 2009, 04:10 PM

Web Bastard
*******
Senior Member
5,957 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: www.bitching.asia


anyone from Penang island ? need to borrow alpha CD ... smile.gif cause my laptop not that power for photoshop ...


Added on March 26, 2009, 4:13 pmif can skip D40/D60 and 1000d for the prices not worth it .... try get ur self a used A100 for starter (pretty cheap now for used set)....

This post has been edited by SonnyCooL: Mar 26 2009, 04:13 PM
SonnyCooL
post Apr 2 2009, 07:28 AM

Web Bastard
*******
Senior Member
5,957 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: www.bitching.asia


QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Apr 1 2009, 11:03 PM)
guys should i get the tamron 1750? i need something to replace my kitlens. well, if the CZ is around 1.7k then i'll get it but fat chance right?

but then again, the vignetting do bothers me..a bit
*
go for Tammy ......
Is not worth to get CZ 16-80 (actually i just sold my CZ few week ago with the prices u mention to forumer).
Another thing, i can't believe forumer here offer me RM 300 for the CZ 16-80.

Reason for tammy over CZ 16-80 is pretty simple.
Focusing - Tammy is much faster in any light condition.
Build quality - Tammy is not that good but for the prices u pay for CZ would u happy with the quality (same like 16-105)
Sharpness : Some said f2.8 abit soft(alot said is good enough) but no one complaint abt F4, if u complaint tammy, i think CZ is not ur choice too.
Glare : it depend how u look at it. is not obvious and always can be solve if u shoot raw.
Price- Yes CZ win by almost 40%+ extra
Focal length - CZ win by -1 and + 30
Brand : CZ.

So do ur math ...


This post has been edited by SonnyCooL: Apr 2 2009, 07:59 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0437sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:12 AM