if 50% failure rate doesn't bother you and the higher the better, MMU is for u, meanwhile this was what others said :

Dr. Liang Meng Suan, Associate Professor of UTAR said failure rate never got as high as 50%
Dr. Peter of MMU's Engineering Faculty Dean (Malacca) has been saying "not enough manpower when students requested for class"
Mr Yau Sing Hing @ Yeow Sing Hing of UTAR mentioned that a 50% failure rate is green light for BEM to revise it's accreditation on MMU
a CPA personnel at The Gardens South Tower, Midvalley mentioned that MMU did not inform them of policy change in W model when they should[/B]

it's the best to follow your mind and let your heart lead~ tat way, u can't blame anyone else if u made a bad choice~

i've given a lot of info on MMU and a little on what one admin and one academic staff said~ to give anymore info is useless if location and urban or rural and got leng lui or not are your most important criterion, i think a geography expert, a community development expert and a leng lui expert would be best in this thread~

lastly, i'd like to say, look from the big picture, UTAR is a non-government organisation(NGO) that was built for the sake of Msians~ it's having benefits of political ties yet does not need to let the government lead, through the years, I've seen it take initiatives to lead the government~

check out UTAR vs MMU

in my opinion, there is no such thing as abolishment of W model in ISO standard, otherwise, where would UM, USM and UKM rank in the world university ranking? the international news on a PhD marker on adjusting only one student's marks instead of adjusting all students' marks (which is stated as a norm as mentioned in paper this week)~ therefore, adjustment of marks should be the norm and ISO should be allowing it~