Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
which temperature to read?
|
TSgenius_xp
|
Mar 18 2009, 07:05 PM, updated 17y ago
|
Getting Started

|
for example,bios will tell you the cpu temperature is 55C,but in windows,speedfan or coretemp will give you both cores' readings,which are like 40-45C. Though,speedfan has another temperature reading says "Temp2"which i have no idea what's that,but i believe it has the same reading as the bios "cpu temperature",the 55C one.So,which is the real processor temperature?
btw,my rig is as below
e2140 965p-ds3 gigabyte micron d9 1gb x 2 ddr2 800 msi 8500gt 256mb
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaRkSyThE
|
Mar 18 2009, 08:56 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
hey bro, just read the CPU temperature  BIOS temps should be more accurate but while in BIOS your CPU load is not 0% hence temperature will be higher than the reported 40-45 degrees in any case, the 40-45 degrees is the correct temp of your proc
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSgenius_xp
|
Mar 18 2009, 09:37 PM
|
Getting Started

|
if that's the case,what's the "Temp2" in speedfan?It increases as the CPU load goes up,full load is about 76 - 78C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
herojack41
|
Mar 19 2009, 10:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(genius_xp @ Mar 18 2009, 09:37 PM) if that's the case,what's the "Temp2" in speedfan?It increases as the CPU load goes up,full load is about 76 - 78C. erm..im nt sure abt it....abt this temp2,i would suggest u get everest or pc wizard  this two temperature reading is accurate too
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSgenius_xp
|
Mar 19 2009, 06:27 PM
|
Getting Started

|
i just did some modification to make my cpu fan less noisy,the core0 and core1 are about 78C full load,and the "temp2" reports a shocking 93C!!i'm getting worried what that really is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsh
|
Mar 22 2009, 10:10 AM
|
|
exactly how accurate is EVEREST ? cause using CoreTemp and hardware monitor, my temperature is around 43C idle using EVEREST and BIOS is 29C only . i kinda sure dat after OCed my proc , it wont even stay at 29C on watercooling . its just too low . and i've read somewhere dat its actually somewhere around d temp +15C for d real temperature .
so yeah i really think dat most accurate is coretemp and hardware monitor .
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSedmunz
|
Mar 22 2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
from my experience the most accurate will be da bios reading..
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOURN3
|
Mar 22 2009, 10:26 AM
|
Getting Started

|
1 noob question here.... is there any difference between temp shown in bios and the one in my mobo software (such as Easy Tune....)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSedmunz
|
Mar 22 2009, 10:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BOURN3 @ Mar 22 2009, 10:26 AM) 1 noob question here.... is there any difference between temp shown in bios and the one in my mobo software (such as Easy Tune....)? bios always show da real temp... some sofware calculate temp based on CPU load
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsh
|
Mar 22 2009, 02:42 PM
|
|
but my BIOS stated 29C under idle . which is too low for an OCed 50% proc .
|
|
|
|
|
|
clawhammer
|
Mar 22 2009, 04:17 PM
|
///M
|
QUOTE(monsh @ Mar 22 2009, 02:42 PM) but my BIOS stated 29C under idle . which is too low for an OCed 50% proc . It really depends because I've had my overclocked processor running 1.48V at around 26C idle on a cold air cond room. Your ambient temp would play a role but nevertheless, we're more concerned about load temps, not idle temps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsh
|
Mar 22 2009, 08:01 PM
|
|
well yeah . 28C on idle 40 on load . its low rite . my ambient temperature should be good . casing fitted with 7 fans in total . really disperse heat nicely . i dont even feel any heat coming out of my casing . d flow is very nice .
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSgenius_xp
|
Mar 23 2009, 04:02 PM
|
Getting Started

|
fan only la..if liquid cooling my mum will go berserk la.
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsh
|
Mar 23 2009, 11:52 PM
|
|
im using liquid cooling >.<" but seriously kinda weird to get this reading . kinda low even if i dont OC my proc .
without OC reading = 25C wif OC 50% reading = 28C
kinda nice for increment of 3C only after OCed .
|
|
|
|
|
|
kamiru84
|
Mar 24 2009, 10:49 AM
|
Getting Started

|
BTW (noob question) how to view in bios ?
|
|
|
|
|