QUOTE(rourou @ Apr 28 2009, 11:29 AM)
the thing is how many guys could suck up their pride and do that?
Girls are money minded, And be proud of it.
|
|
Apr 28 2009, 01:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(rourou @ Apr 28 2009, 11:29 AM) the thing is how many guys could suck up their pride and do that? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2009, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Apr 28 2009, 05:36 PM) Cyrix isn't confused, though he may sound confusing. He probably just didn't express himself properly. Well said. Perhaps one might call it pride or ego. Some might call it bringing up. Some males are brought up that way in view that they should be the sole or main bread winner. These are the types of males that feel intimidated amongst successful women. Heard of the term "Penis envy"?<snip> It is something along those lines. I've been brought up similarly but without the pride part. Perfectly OK if the woman is more successful or earns higher wages. This is because in the long term, it is the child that benefits. Don't care which parent's ego is inflated or care that who thinks what. People can say and think all they want, but the important thing is the family has a roof over their head, clothes to wear and food to eat. It matters not whom brings home the bread. |
|
|
Apr 29 2009, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Luxury as one mentioned has somehow been 'downsized' to 'necessity'.
Of course different people have different values. How many would deem fine dining as need or necessity? How many would agree that eating out is luxury or necessity? (Even eating out has various levels be it mamak, chinese restaurants, fast food,) My parents used to live from hand to mouth with practically 0 cash leftover to save. Did they get a divorce or separate? Nope. They chose to get married even in poverty. With love, hard work and determination, they made it. |
|
|
May 12 2009, 12:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(b3rnard7 @ May 12 2009, 12:41 PM) That may be your opinion, but I'm with Hawkie on this. I personally know of a couple whom started out living in squatter houses, who now are decent off. They married young after coming back from university. Early day's of marriage life, after paying rent for their house, they didn't even have money to purchase furniture for it. Food? Bread for at least one meal a day.Money is everything? In their 30+ years of marriage, not once have they quarreled (if any at all) about money. I say it is more the individual, how much importance each individual places on materials be it certain lifestyle or certain objects, how this said individual perceives their status and self-worth. There are people that draw self-worth and status from things When you take away these things, suddenly there is a huge gap and they feel left out, social outcast, the misfit. These are the people that quite likely will say, "I need xxx amount of money in order to be happy" This post has been edited by Tatsumaki: May 12 2009, 12:52 PM |
|
|
May 12 2009, 03:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(Duke Red @ May 12 2009, 01:50 PM) This is relative to where you live. I mean if you're an eskimo living in the North Pole, money isn't exactly a priority. However if you live in a bustling city, the same cannot be said. Whoa, whoa easy now. I didn't mean to say we don't need any money at all. I quite a realistic person. I agree, food needs to be put on the table, roof needs to be put over the head and clothes on the back. I'm more taking a lifestyle point of view.Fine dining versus normal restaurant standard sedan car versus continental car periodic holidays versus kid's education fund a pair of shoes costing RM 950 versus RM 150 a bag costing 875 versus 200 Oshkosh or Baby Guess versus morning market/night market baby clothes baby stroller RM 1200 Mc Laren versus carrying |
|
|
May 12 2009, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(ezralimm @ May 12 2009, 05:14 PM) Added on May 12, 2009, 5:15 pm so basically you're saying that girls dont want to make babies with guys who are not good providers QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 05:31 PM) different ppl different standard la, I may consider my husband as rich but some of my gf will just snub at him, coz they're eyeing for the new C-class. I'm mulling on those two points. Both IMHO hold water. I can see moorish's point in the light of the maternal instinct that women have. Am I far off to say that a woman would only think of bringing a child into this world once she is fully contended that her family will be enough to provide for this child until this child is able to fully stand on his/her own feet? (not walking, but in a independent way)Some ppl would be happy if hubby buys them a MYVI (me And again, the old dead horse, different women have different yardsticks of 'provision' (Let's not go there, let the horse rest in pieces) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0672sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 06:07 PM |