Girls who believe that money and "security", prestige are the most important things are the best to play around with.

That's because there are a lot of them, and very few guys like US who have the money and the power.

WE are the scarce, unique item, and their ***** is just a commodity, free to be used and then chucked.

The best thing is that when you're at the top you discover how much good looking ***** there is out there absolutely willing to whore themselves out just to move up the social ladder!!!

Then they will try to sink their claws into you by using "love" and other pair bonding techniques. x_x

Don't be fooled, guys.

Just play

Rich and dumb guys are such a catch that I actually applaud any woman that manages to latch on to one.

But be forewarned, you may face some really stiff competition from other women with a similar mating drive.

---

This thread IS about sucking men's money. In your case, you've exclusively equated capability and security for yourself and your children with how much money a man makes and is willing to spend on you, with the more being the better.

Why do you do this? Women who do this are either supremely idiotic, or have an ulterior motive.

In any case, it doesn't matter. I am an advocate of men making the money, but for themselves and their own goals and needs. If their needs include having children, then they DO require the ability to make money. Not for buying dumb b****es things during courtship, but for sending their children to good schools and making sure they do not live worse lives than in Slumdog Millionaire.

For women, I merely illustrated how without pair bonding you would still have nothing. But that's what you get for whoring out your own *****, really.

---

Added on April 28, 2009, 3:04 amWhat if I get a girl pregnant and then dump her? What if I promised you "love forever", "show you my sincere", buy you lots of expensive things, then "confess" that I love you "deep deep", and beg you to marry me? LMAO! I love pidgin.

Will talking to me about responsibility make me stay? Will calling me a sissy do it? Even throwing a rice slipper at my head?

I don't think so. I'll just up and go and leave the NOISE behind.

If you want men to stay then give them real reasons to WANT to stay. But it's pretty much guaranteed that's not going to happen if you value them merely as a function of what they can earn. You also don't get to judge the nuances of character if you blindly follow the TS's train of logic like a sheeple.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 03:10 AM

If I had money, I would rather buy ostrich or kangaroo meat. They're healthier and will not give you heart attack like fatty kobe beef.

Let me put it this way... a woman spending on me by no means threatens my manhood in any way.



She put forth the idea that money, and money alone (by omission of other traits and the denigration of "love" as immature) equates to security and thus reliability for a long term partner.

I've heard this from gold-diggers big and small (and smart and dumb) before.

It's irrelevant if you miss the point, which I think, you did, on purpose.

Or maybe when girls decide to have babies they need to GROW UP into women, and stop being fearful and whiny about everything about themselves.

I swear, women today are nowhere near as competent as women in our grandmother's times. Back then if they had an education they would become successful businesswomen.

Today they will watch Oprah until they are fat and spend their money on ice cream or useless LV bags.

---

Added on April 28, 2009, 2:53 pmActually, you don't need to give her that much money or gifts as BMW. Only a rich moron would do that.

Most likely only one tenth of that amount would be spent, and one tenth of that amount paid would be used on the woman's own expense to abort the child which resulted from the sperm injected into her.

You must understand the psychology of rich men and the poor women who chase after them.

It's obvious that a lot of people in this thread do not know what they're talking about. They just want to legitimize their own peculiar world views and personal attitudes. LOL!!!

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 02:53 PM

Oh but I am generous to the worthy.

You know that what you just did is a faggot mannerism, right?

Where did you pick that up? From some ghetto "sistas" in the hood?

LMAO!

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 04:20 PM

You sir, are one confused person.

You really did miss the point. Either that, or carry on diverting attention elsewhere. That's a really classy style of debating.



Did my rhetoric threaten your sense of right and wrong that much? Or did you just need to use an ad hominem to prove your points?

LOL!

More than you even suspect, Moorish.

Sure thing!

Start a new thread and I'll explain why over there.

If you start a new thread I PROMISE you that I will tell you why I think you're confused.

Does my assurance satisfy you?

Classic female arguing tactic.

Use shaming tactics to divert attention from points they can neither answer or refute.

I should start a thread on all the classic shaming tactics that sophisticated, diamond and LV wearing, "modern independent women" (self proclaimed) use. LMAO!!!

---

Added on April 28, 2009, 4:49 pmMy dear you sound like you need a hug.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 04:49 PM

Well, I assumed that you wanted a real answer, fully fleshed out and furnished with examples?

I could write a tl:dr post of course but it would never do your enquiry justice, and for a matter as worthy as this surely it deserves an entire thread to itself.

How can it be impeccable and flawed at the same time?

Yes, and the overwhelming social trend is that it has come to be expected, not appreciated.

---

Added on April 28, 2009, 6:46 pmMy dear Ezralimm. Face the Truth™: Putting your hand on your hip, cocking your head from side to side while snapping your fingers and saying "Ouch!!! Now that has to hurt!" is NOT a masculine way of making a point, and IS INDEED a mannerism heavily used by African American women hailing from poorer, inner city slums.

When a man displays an uncanny sense of female mimicry like this, it IS INDEED a faggot mannerism.

Face the Truth™

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 06:57 PM

*I* use ad hominems, happyforever? Oh please. You know that you use it a lot too. Admit it.

The gist of my entire argument has been that evaluating the reliability of a man based entirely on the amount of money he already makes is a flawed and indeed idiotic method.

I gave an example of how without the pair bonding process the woman in question would still be nowhere near her dream of happy ever after.

I gave an example of how little it means to men to have women like yourself bandy platitudes like "responsibility" around even as you take us staying with you FOREVER for granted.

So by all means, continue to imply things about my character if you must. That is really the only angle that you can exploit.

That, and debating matters with the other men here still clinging to past values that have already been fully demonstrated to have become expected, but not appreciated.

(By the way honey, the men in your life don't stick around, do they? )

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 07:57 PM

No Ezra, that is exactly what is in the first post. The amount of money as the measure of reliability. NOTHING ELSE was included as a measure apart from money and the 'security' it supposedly brings.



You're exactly right, because nobody in this thread (except you maybe? Hmm?) said that women are evaluated solely based on how good looking they are.

Oh come on now, don't be sulking now just because I called you out on a faggot mannerism.

Face the Truth™: "Everybody" is hypocritical to an extend or another... but not all hypocrites use faggotry to prove their point.

Try practising what you preach, brother.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 28 2009, 07:56 PM

Make money for yourself, not to get a girl or even to marry her. The money you make should further your own goals. As for women, rather than marrying up, it is perhaps a better idea to make your own money also, in order to be financially independent. I've known of enough examples where women marry richer men only to find themselves completely dependent and thus completely at their mercy.

Yup.

If you're Chinese then chances are you would have family who came from backgrounds of poverty. Aunts, uncles, or grandparents.

In the old days daughters would be married off into rich families in arranged marriages. This was something that women had to be rather stoic about, but it wasn't unheard of for a girl to cry and be very sad that she would be married off to somebody she hardly knew, chances are is quite ugly, just because of money that her family wanted. In those days women wanted the choice to marry for love, and to be with a man they liked, rather than have that choice made for them.

Malaysia is built on the backs of the poor. How many stories and examples do we know of, of hardworking, poor people who were constantly on the lookout for business opportunities and finally made it big, being able to afford nice houses, expensive cars and send their children overseas for education where a mere generation ago they came from a Chinese ghetto (I mean kampung baru), or plantation? Back in those days, a woman with choice would rather be with a man who would care and appreciate her and was hardworking, than go for somebody who already had the money - because the psychology of the latter usually meant that a poorer woman from a poorer family attaching themselves to such a man would only be used and then chucked like expendable goods.

But things have changed. They are no longer the same. People themselves have changed.

That was then. THIS is now. Old values no longer have meaning in a world that has changed so drastically in a mere two to three generations.

I can only exhort the menfolk here to also evolve with the times. Evolve, or be extinct. Clinging to past values will not save you or give you inherent worthiness - no matter how many people pat you on the head and coo at you the words "good boy", "responsible" and "gentleman". Most of these same people will not be around when you fall on hard times and are in need of support.

You must be able to tell apart the real and the fake.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Apr 29 2009, 04:29 PM

No. Not evolve to become one of the herd.

But to evolve to become ABOVE the herd.

Do you understand now?