Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Discussion, Grab it now
TSChinJB7623
|
Mar 4 2009, 09:35 PM, updated 15y ago
|
|
Released on 26 May 32-bit Download32-bit: Build: 6002.18005.090410-1830 File Name: Windows6.0-KB948465-X86.exe Size: 365,230,920 bytes CRC: 3368C777 MD5: C9394FD32DB15619328AF4FF0315750A SHA1: 106C0484D7449CC4B70353C21D0C0D63E4BA66C3 64-bit Download64-bit: Build: 6002.18005.090410-1830 File Name: Windows6.0-KB948465-X64.exe Size: 605,410,472 bytes CRC: 1737E14D MD5: A3BCB1FFDB366397FA5FAB0898EB098D SHA1: BE8D74ADC029FA7350FC1F0D32BEF853C0519A92 This post has been edited by samurai1337: May 26 2009, 06:43 PM
|
|
|
|
kamiru84
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:46 PM
|
Getting Started
|
hi, izzit mean vista sp2 need to pay ?
|
|
|
|
chanws8
|
Mar 6 2009, 11:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kamiru84 @ Mar 6 2009, 05:46 PM) hi, izzit mean vista sp2 need to pay ? The update is totaly free... Juz like update ur antivirus..
|
|
|
|
keeseng12
|
Mar 9 2009, 09:22 PM
|
|
they wont charge for update to vista sp2. it's like an update from vista to sp1 or xp sp2 to sp3
|
|
|
|
MojA_VieW
|
Mar 9 2009, 09:55 PM
|
|
unless if you want to upgrade to another version of windows..i'll have price there
|
|
|
|
OKLY
|
Mar 14 2009, 02:54 PM
|
The Penguin Vader
|
I really hope there will be more performance improvements in their SP2. Windows Vista isn't that bad after all but many people in my opinion won't use Windows Vista is probably the performance issue.
|
|
|
|
mervinr
|
Mar 16 2009, 11:05 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(yongkailoon @ Mar 14 2009, 02:54 PM) I really hope there will be more performance improvements in their SP2. Windows Vista isn't that bad after all but many people in my opinion won't use Windows Vista is probably the performance issue. Based on what is written here, there are no performance improvements: Notable Changes in Vista SP2 This SP seems to focus on support for new hardware and technologies plus adding more compatiblity and so on.
|
|
|
|
FarCry3r
|
Mar 16 2009, 12:14 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mervinr @ Mar 16 2009, 11:05 AM) Based on what is written here, there are no performance improvements: Notable Changes in Vista SP2 This SP seems to focus on support for new hardware and technologies plus adding more compatiblity and so on. Don't forget that every new service pack released contains cumulative updates over past service pack, so it definitely have performance improvements even though it's not listed in the TechNet page...
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Mar 16 2009, 01:20 PM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
yesh. and after testing RC release of SP2, I saw less memory usage for basic services
|
|
|
|
TechnoDude94
|
Mar 16 2009, 03:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sai86 @ Mar 13 2009, 02:37 PM) if window 7 release in 2010...sure got many bug...hope they release it after a few beta try out 1st...if not juz is another vista.... I doubt so, as Windows 7 has been released has been in public BETA. Most of the bugs should've been iron-ed out.
|
|
|
|
mervinr
|
Mar 17 2009, 08:53 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Mar 16 2009, 12:14 PM) Don't forget that every new service pack released contains cumulative updates over past service pack, so it definitely have performance improvements even though it's not listed in the TechNet page... It's not the case for this SP QUOTE Is a cumulative version of SP2 that includes the updates from SP1 available? No. There are a number of reasons for this, the primary one being the overall size of the standalone package for SP1. Having a cumulative SP2 that includes the updates from SP1 would have made the size too large. Furthermore, because SP2 is a single-servicing model, and since Windows Server already includes SP1, a cumulative SP2 would have meant a needlessly larger file for Server customers. Finally, in the consumer space the majority of customers have already installed SP1 over WU or will be doing so before SP2, so incorporating SP1 into a cumulative SP2 would take unnecessary time and bandwidth.
Is Vista SP1 quality not sufficient, requiring that you do another Service Pack so soon after releasing Service Pack 1? Automated feedback (telemetry) provided by Microsoft’s Customer Experience Improvement program since launching Service Pack 1, indicates that Service Pack 1 is equal to or higher than nearly all dimensions of Windows XP Service Pack 2 baselines. Based on this data we believe we have delivered on our promise of improved performance, reliability, application and device compatibility, as well as security in Service Pack 1. Service Pack 2 is being developed primarily with Windows Server 2008 in mind, and will be the first service pack for Server 2008 since it launched. Service Pack 2, designed for install on Server 2008 and Windows Vista Service Pack 1, represents a single serviceability model we are adopting for these two products, making it easier to manage and deploy this service pack broadly in business networks. SP2 also rolls up all previous Windows Updates to create a more convenient updating experience for customers with new PCs.
|
|
|
|
FarCry3r
|
Mar 17 2009, 09:15 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mervinr @ Mar 17 2009, 08:53 AM) It's not the case for this SP Now, you get this wrong. Read my previous post carefully. I said new service pack released contains cumulative updates over past service pack, not including past service pack. In easy English, that means, all updates after SP1 is included in SP2, now, do you understand? This post has been edited by FarCry3r: Mar 17 2009, 09:16 AM
|
|
|
|
TechnoDude94
|
Mar 17 2009, 07:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MojA_VieW @ Mar 17 2009, 02:16 PM) service pack is meant to improve the older SP..& of course it included with all features from the previous version..with the improve one..now,what we can do?just wait and see what is coming next.. The RC2 has been released, however, I don't feel a difference as I feel SP1 is great already.
|
|
|
|
freddy manson
|
Mar 18 2009, 12:58 PM
|
|
yup, im trying my SP2 RC but so far no improvement in terms of performance that i can feel~~ quite smooth lah.. macam biasa2 jer~~
|
|
|
|
TechnoDude94
|
Mar 18 2009, 03:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Mar 18 2009, 12:58 PM) yup, im trying my SP2 RC but so far no improvement in terms of performance that i can feel~~ quite smooth lah.. macam biasa2 jer~~ Agree with you especially since SP1 made Vista improve tremendously in terms of performance (IMHO).
|
|
|
|
OKLY
|
Mar 19 2009, 11:53 AM
|
The Penguin Vader
|
Perhaps no performance boost can be felt if your system is a decent one.
|
|
|
|
TechnoDude94
|
Mar 19 2009, 12:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(yongkailoon @ Mar 19 2009, 11:53 AM) Perhaps no performance boost can be felt if your system is a decent one. I'm referring to my BETA PC which is Intel P4 3.2GHz, 2X 2GB DDR400MHz RAM, ASUS P4P800-SE-Deluxe, ASUS ATi Radeon 9800XT 256MB (AGP).
|
|
|
|
xcen
|
Mar 20 2009, 12:24 AM
|
|
I hope they correct some small hiccups here and there for Windows Vista. But I didn't expect SP2 to come out so late though, I thought it would be out in June or something lol.
|
|
|
|
skylinegtr34rule4life
|
Mar 22 2009, 02:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xcen @ Mar 20 2009, 12:24 AM) I hope they correct some small hiccups here and there for Windows Vista. But I didn't expect SP2 to come out so late though, I thought it would be out in June or something lol. lolz maybe microsoft wants 2 assure ppl that using vista is frenly and no more major bugs anymore...so they take their sweet time 2 polish up the sp2 as shiny as possible This post has been edited by skylinegtr34rule4life: Mar 22 2009, 02:09 PM
|
|
|
|