QUOTE(kaiserreich @ May 12 2009, 04:24 PM)
It's more like the other way around.
As long as the monitor can display >= 1080 horizontal lines, progressive scan, it is considered FullHD.
If it is a full HD on a smaller screen (because now I understand any with 1920x1080 is considered Full HD, right?) ain't it makes the font size of window become smaller under native resolution? which is painful to watch.As long as the monitor can display >= 1080 horizontal lines, progressive scan, it is considered FullHD.
Seem like lot of people want a full HD monitor, but until now I can't find an answer, why I need a full HD monitor for ordinary usage like online, checking email, occassionally movie (ordinary movie, not blue-ray or HD).
So I don't need to spend more to find a HD monitor? right?
You need HD source of movie in order to have good HD view on the picture, right?
If not (without HD source), whether it is a full HD monitor, the movie pciture quality make no different, correct?
Sorry a bit noob on HD issue.
This Dell monitor good or not? -> Dell UltraSharpTM 2209WA with IPS panel. http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/c...bsd1&l=en&s=bsd
Try to get rid of TN panel due to colour shifting problem.
Edited, any recommendation else? Size doesn't matter be it 22 or 20, most important is colour accuracy (not colour shifting problem), price as long as arond 1K, no problem.
Appreciated any comment. Thanks.
This post has been edited by cherroy: May 12 2009, 04:48 PM
May 12 2009, 04:44 PM
Quote
0.0435sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled