its very slow for sure
even lowyat cant load properly at times sigh
Downtime The "extreme Screamyx slowdowns" Thread, Internet too slow ? Keep us up to date
Downtime The "extreme Screamyx slowdowns" Thread, Internet too slow ? Keep us up to date
|
|
Mar 16 2009, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
748 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
its very slow for sure
even lowyat cant load properly at times sigh |
|
|
Apr 5 2009, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
748 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Apr 5 2009, 03:26 PM) wats dat use? edi complain countless time. look @ the complains statistic, is there any different in our broadband since we complained? no, the only thing is it gets slower. TM could hav, & shud hav, done better on their routing. not like v all depends on a single undersea cable to surf US site. why other ISP & other country broadband not effected or @ least not so slow? coz tmnut dunno how 2 route. even wen there is not problem, using proxy load majority of the website faster den default IP. wat is dis? routing sux la. dis is unacceptable, under normal circumstances, it shud b & must b faster den using proxy. QUOTE(tech3910 @ Apr 5 2009, 03:26 PM) wats dat use? they wan cheapest routing possible edi complain countless time. look @ the complains statistic, is there any different in our broadband since we complained? no, the only thing is it gets slower. TM could hav, & shud hav, done better on their routing. not like v all depends on a single undersea cable to surf US site. why other ISP & other country broadband not effected or @ least not so slow? coz tmnut dunno how 2 route. even wen there is not problem, using proxy load majority of the website faster den default IP. wat is dis? routing sux la. dis is unacceptable, under normal circumstances, it shud b & must b faster den using proxy. overall tmnet routing is quite good (over 10) but the link always down its either they didnt pay or failed to comply the regulation with peering companies http://www.robtex.com/as/as4788.html just look over here how many of their routes that connects to streamyx customers break (missing) http://www.robtex.com/as/as4788.html look at jaring, their network backbone is far more better and stable and best part they only have 3 routes opposed to tmnet with over 10 routes and still can perform far better than them with far lesser or no downtime at all. http://www.robtex.com/as/as2042.html this is jaring dns servers locally http://www.robtex.com/dns/jaring.my.html this is tmnuts dns local server http://www.robtex.com/dns/tm.net.my.html compare it with jaring which one u guys think is better? even for local internal routes |
|
|
Apr 5 2009, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
748 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(jtdc @ Apr 5 2009, 04:13 PM) According to this old link, its still TMNut who provides Jaring the link. wired broadband is being routed through tmnets local network then channel it to their backbonehttp://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/0...-broadband-soon This means, its like Jaring subscribers just have a middleman, but still ends up getting TMNut *****y service. Any "independent" competitor out there, teach this TM a lesson... if u talk about overall incoming & outgoing peering its different both tmnet and jaring peering are totally different and separate |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0163sec
0.42
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 07:35 AM |