a bit disappoint on digi package.

The compare chart is not 100% houour.

For celcom even quote is 5GB but it fix with RM68 per month.

no as digi, got hidden extra charge capped at RM 138.

If like this, Celcom is still worth it ,because I can use extra 2GB with RM68.

But digi will start charge you after 3GB , the 2GB extra will charge you max at RM138.

totally pricey.

you are right but celcom is running at 3.6Mbps compare to Digi 0.7Mbps....
But then again, can celcom give you 3.6Mbps consistently or did they ever give you 3.6Mbps?????

Using Maxis 384kbps at Meru town was worse than using EDGE, my edge can load faster than maxis.....TESTED & PROVEN.

Digi 3G just only in Klang Valley, they should expand their coverage more, see THIS

I think the coverage more worse than u mobile,...aisehhhh    

Are you working for DiGi?

It sucks to have staffs like you in a good company.

I have mentioned before many times.
The only 3 main nationwide fiber backbone providers with wide coverages are TM, Time(TdC as mentioned by your dearself) and Jaring.
How do you supposed DiGi is going to link up their packet switch network comprising of Node-Bs around the country with an aggregated 14.4mbps each to deliver enough bandwidth for HSPA services?

I've gave my facts.You insist that it's not. Don't you think it's better for you to prove me wrong otherwise?

Do us a favour by performing a few traceroutes to various servers.

-to TM's website
-to Singapore
-to Japan
-to Taiwan
-to US

We would love to see your average ping rates and hops.

Hah!
Hop 2-11 all belongs to Jaring!

So DiGi is leasing bandwidth from Jaring? I'm not surprised they chose to buy from Jaring because in terms of reliability, Jaring is the most reliable among the 3 top carrier grade isps.

Jaring is behind DiGi 3G afterall...That's good news.

Of course.That's how the whole consumer broadband concept works.

The isp allocates a fixed amount of bandwidth and takes the chance. They need to maintain a good balance by not overselling it and at the same time maintain enough subscribers to ensure that their ROI is achieved.

Imagine it as I put a cake on the table, 2-3 person still can have a big slice of it, but if more than 10 guests comes to take their share, each one will only be left with a small piece.

Where Malaysia fails is that TM tries to monopolise the whole market but they can't bake a cake big enough to supply everyone with a considerable big slice of cake which is satisfying.
They have this shallow mentality of maintaining a protected market so that their bosses with fat asses could continue to play golf everyday and stay in big bangalows at the expense of the people.

See what happened to AIG execs who owned big mansions in US? People are organizing tour to those homes and sending them threat letters. What they did was totally wrong.It was so greedy of them to take tax payers money for their own comfort.

wow!
you're not done with the debate yet?
why not you do it yourself and post your facts here for everyone to see?