pls give me any comment between this old board n new board of gtx260

55nm will give more room to OC..

65nm has more room volterra

i will not oc or something else to this card,i just run it with standard clock.some say this 55nm not stable coz its hot.nvidia cut budget this gtx260 55nm,smaller size,smaller cooler.is that true?

No =_=

IIANM, 65nm version better than 55nm version at all cases

so better take 65nm?

i learned something yesterday from a good friend ..

65nm eats more voltage thus making more room for OC then 55nm version ..

however, if you don't OC till 100% .. then get 55nm

imho, just take the gtx260+ with 216 SP, regardless 55 or 65nm

yerp agree wit pikacu..if lazy to oc then get any factory OC ady..

This post has been edited by BigSaver: Feb 17 2009, 08:59 PM

some review in toms hardware make me thinking twice about this 55nm board.but this new card shrink the cooler.pls show me some facts that shows 55nm better than 65nm

This post has been edited by taq_gt: Feb 17 2009, 09:01 PM

if u insist on cooler..i think palit gtx sonic got twin fan..

55nm use less power. correct me if i'm wrong.

on stock, definately 55nm would be slightly faster than the 65nm.

around 15% faster if i'm not mistaken as someone did mentioned it before. try to search around.

absolutely correct.. proved that GTX285 55nm consumes slightly higher than GTX 260+ (216SP) 65nm around 10W

so nothing wrong la with new board 55nm ni?

no la. GTX285 is new board with 55nm oso. no prob at all.

hehe.ok.thx to all ppl