QUOTE(cheebc @ Feb 17 2009, 02:36 PM)
think so, should be around the price tag with other new upcoming phone like omnia hd, htc touch pro 2 etc.
Added on February 17, 2009, 2:39 pm
nothing wrong using symbian, its one of the most successful mobile os nowadays.
its just like asking, ubuntu & vista, witch is better? each have their advantage & disadvantage...
samsung use WinMo in Omnia, but in the upcoming Omnia HD, they switch to the lastest symbian s60 5th edition, why? if WinMo really better than symbian, why samsung changing it? is samsung designer stupid?
Well there's nothing wrong with any mobile operating system used be it WinMo, Symbian-S40/60/80, Symbian-UIQ, MobileLinux, etc. Its more about market segmentation. I don't believe the 'Omnia HD' will be the name. We've already got an Omnia HD which is a Korean-only product. Its the same Omnia but with a higher resolution screen plus other improvements. The i8910 will be one of Samsung's infotainment line of phones. The infotainment line of phones WILL use both WinMo and Symbian depending on models. Maybe they will go completely Symbian because WinMo (in its current state) isn't as friendly as most consumers would like it to be. Added on February 17, 2009, 2:39 pm
nothing wrong using symbian, its one of the most successful mobile os nowadays.
its just like asking, ubuntu & vista, witch is better? each have their advantage & disadvantage...
samsung use WinMo in Omnia, but in the upcoming Omnia HD, they switch to the lastest symbian s60 5th edition, why? if WinMo really better than symbian, why samsung changing it? is samsung designer stupid?
WinMo 7 will be a better answer to that but we don't know now, obviously. But that does not mean WinMo is complete rubbish. The reason why mobile operating system like WinMo is preferred is due to the ease of programming especially when you want a custom UI shell on top of it. Thats how we got TouchFlo/3D, Xperia Panels, Samsung UI. Its easy to write in .Net mobile frameworks, Windows related standards than on Symbian. By the way Symbian does not provide the infrastructure for complex UI transitions. However, Symbian can be very light weighted without fancy UIs. Then we have to say both Symbian and WinMo is equal in the UI side of things. Flash UI was promising but it wasn't on most Symbian due to licensing issues. Symbian Foundation will be a better avenue for that.
So I would thing of it in different market segmentations. WinMo for business users who wants Push Mail and still have most of the common Windows-like apps and file format support system. Symbian S60/Symbian Foundation for the mid-high end market while Symbian S40 (Nokia-only) for the mass consumer market. For other manufacturers, it will still be dominated with Flash UI non-smartphone interfaces.
This post has been edited by davidmak: Feb 17 2009, 04:15 PM
Feb 17 2009, 04:11 PM

Quote
0.0194sec
0.90
7 queries
GZIP Disabled