if me i will get a used neo for 35k and drop in mivec would be faster
Satria NEO CPS, Media Launch and Test Drive Review
Satria NEO CPS, Media Launch and Test Drive Review
|
|
Feb 14 2009, 03:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
cool car. but just not worth the price. sadly after all these years it still no match for a old and completely stock EG6 or even EK9..not even a race..cornering or drag
if me i will get a used neo for 35k and drop in mivec would be faster |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 02:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
QUOTE(ch1ck3n @ Feb 14 2009, 08:03 PM) have no idea wad crap are u talking, both the EG 6 and EK 9 are type-r models from Honda.. EG6 is no type r. not a track car either.those are track ready cars which are street legal, it is a no brainer to think of comparing them. at least if your comparing stock honda civic that is more appropriate. to me any kind of improvements is better than no improvements. At least there is a campro now..then there is the cps and iafm. 10 years ago we only had ripped-off mitsubishi engines. neo, EG6 and EK9 are street car, all 1.6, same hatch back, same category, so it is fair comparing to it compare to stock civic? 10yrs ago EK4 hatch still has 175hp |
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 03:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 01:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2009, 01:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
QUOTE(xshiro @ Feb 15 2009, 03:59 PM) he pointed out neo is overall champion, maybe we could google and see find real info about this, but saying it jaguh kampung does not it deny the fact its actually beat vtec and vvti and it does not deny it too slow also, if so called overall champion is true. so u saying campro beat vtecif u think its too slow, that becos maybe you dont know how to run it. how about when u stop at traffic light some b16a want to race u smoke also cannot smell |
|
|
Feb 16 2009, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: ¯\(°_o)/¯ |
QUOTE(mockv1per @ Feb 16 2009, 03:13 AM) yeah, we know CPS still new and not that powerful enough for some people.. Proton should have just use E01 from Petronas instead of building their own Campro CPS... still its Malaysian made product. im not honda owner but comparing kampung engine to K20A is just wrong. like comparing piece of cow dung to piece of gold.then i guess bibbyGirl will stop bragging and comparing it with b16a.. E01 is comparable or maybe even better than k20a. u cant be joking. K20A???? u know how good it is the K20A??? u know K20A is a engine made by god. one of the best 4cyl NA engine today. stock K20AR in EG/EK hatch chassis can take on stock evo and 350hp FF wira. and in stock form it will last some 10-20yrs of reliability just like any honda. some kampung engine want compare to K20A?? how long will that kampung engine last before explode? Added on February 16, 2009, 2:19 pm QUOTE(egiewan @ Feb 16 2009, 03:29 AM) So the Neo won last year's Class B in MME, do you even know what mods the R3 boys had done to the Campro engine? Dun just use MME as a yardstick for everything. Like someone just said here, jaguh kampung only yes. proton is getting better nowadays. but fans boy just cant accept the fact it still lose to some 1993 EG6 by very very farAdded on February 16, 2009, 2:23 pm QUOTE(cheewin88 @ Feb 16 2009, 01:51 PM) engine life:neo 2.0 = 2week silvia = 10yrs This post has been edited by bibbyGirl: Feb 16 2009, 02:23 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0181sec
0.62
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 06:43 AM |