pic spam: Sg Gabai

---

Added on February 16, 2009, 12:54 pmWonka, nice #1!!

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 16 2009, 12:54 PM

that is why it is always good to use an original sony *hint f42/f58

maybe it's just me, but I like the tamron pics..hmmm

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 17 2009, 10:22 AM

Bro, I looked at the exif at your flickr page, it seems like you've switched the pictures, the first picture is from the cz, the second picture is from the tammy. look at the bottom of the flickr property page and you'll see lens type.

hmmm... IMHO, from the pictures ryzan posted, and from my noob's perspective, the cz and the tammy are quite evenly matched.

I just bought a Victory 3080 tripod from digicolor!! wooohoooo

how much?? I was planning to get one myself, if we'd went together, can cheaper ka?? hehe

fas29: nice pics!!

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 19 2009, 05:58 PM

where?? cheapest i got was rm2530

bysquashy: beautiful!! wow!!

probably a higher capacity

do you need the live view?? If you don't, then A200 single kit with a wide angle lens will do just fine.

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 25 2009, 05:23 PM

doesn't make sense..have a larger OVF AND Liveview? in an A200 body? if so, then why A300's OVF is smaller to accommodate Liveview?

how much? where from? for god's sake, don't get anything else other than the camera. shops normally will markup prices for optional accessories to cover for the camera body's lack of profit. (speaking from experience)

alaa.. I was supposed to get my siggy 1770 today, but the shop say the stock has not yet arrived..was looking forward to using it during the flash workshop..

nah, I went to Leoscom, got a better deal there. but it's coming next week. can't wait!!

Yeah, the thing that tipped me off the edge (either this, the 16105 or the 1680Z) was that this was definitely a value-for-money lens, it has 1:2.3 @ 70mm magnification (if and when one wants to explore macro photography), it has a workable range (17-70, slightly wider than the kit), a decent aperture range (f2.8-4.5), reasonably fast focusing (even ahmike agrees), acceptably sharp even wide open, not forgetting the external look (I've always liked the sigma's outer shell, looks damn cool, Jeff even made a comment about how you've always been a fan of the sigma shell), and of course the INSANE minimum focusing distance (MFD) of twenty-freaking-centimeters!!!!!!

p/s: albert knows all of this, the info above is meant to poison other alpha users subtly, hehe

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 28 2009, 04:52 AM

aiya, monique should've shaved her legs la..

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 28 2009, 05:59 PM

ooo la la~ bro signither far more sexier than the models...


waa, din, u're the one who took the jumping pic..nice one bro! my favourite among those shown in front just now.

This post has been edited by craziqbal: Feb 28 2009, 06:34 PM

no dash --> DSLRA200W

check out what I have....