Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V21!, The Orange Legion

views
     
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 15 2009, 12:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(seram @ Feb 13 2009, 05:50 PM)
i saw 1 guy use a100 with 1680cz and produce awesome picture now i get poisoned.. help me!!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Oh mai.. Polarizer poison rclxub.gif rclxub.gif


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Feb 14 2009, 10:53 AM)
hai, lonely day, only got alpha teman me  laugh.gif
*
Who? tongue.gif tongue.gif




SinnerBuyer
post Feb 15 2009, 01:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(nickilala @ Feb 15 2009, 12:51 AM)
hi all, any one know abt the Sigma 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 DG Macro? any review? suggestion pls..smile.gif
*
http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/reviews.asp?IDLens=274
provides good reviews
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 16 2009, 12:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


MAHA combos are better.
2700mah for power.
Then keep another 2100mah in bag. Low discharge can keep for long time.
Same charger but can charge 2 different type batteries.

But I got my Sanyo Eneloop. I bought it coz it design looks nice. Haha
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 17 2009, 10:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(kucingfight @ Feb 16 2009, 09:41 PM)
A200 VS D60 NooB Comparison (Subjective= In My Opinion)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I've been testing out the D60 during CNY too, which belong to my cousin's friend.
Definitely got the built quality. Very solid, got metal feel. While I'm testing the D60, my uncle went picking some coconuts and posed up to me, I compose and press the shutter, but heck, it took longer than a200 to focus. And missed the shot because of I thought I took the picture already. Maybe because I was get too used to a200 focusing time.
However, in close up, where distance is short, D60 can focus in no time and no hunting in lowlight. Maybe because of the assist light. The kitlens was great too, high built quality and looks 'stylish'. Really hope Sony improves their kitlens. But display wise, when I zoomed the photo, the photo become 'pixelate', lower resolution compare to a200. That's normal thought because D60 is older than a200 (isn't it? 2.5 inch LCD era).

There is some points I love about D60; it's smaller in size so won't draw much attention traveling around and it's built quality.
"Clicky" D60 shutter sound compared to "Snappy" a200 shutter. I think I love the Clicky sound more..

But still, a200 is still the award winning entry-level DSLR isn't it? icon_rolleyes.gif

Again, I only compared the D60 and a200, not their brand. This has nothing to do with the brand anyway and I didn't conclude myself "which brand are better and the best of these two". So pls don't flame me. shocking.gif shakehead.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 17 2009, 10:49 PM
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 19 2009, 01:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


If we need to record HD vid.. Just buy SONY camcoder lor..
a700 + sony camcoder = D90 price vise.
sony camcoder definitely > D90 video performance vise.
a700 and D90 pic quality and ISO would be almost the same
value vise and performance vise, a700 + cam still the best...

however today people just want to integrate everything..
and they value that as something that worth to have..

HD and DSLR just like handphone and camera mah.

if a handphone got latest 8MP + vid recording will still lose to a 6MP digital camera.. that mean if we try to integrate everything into 1 piece.. we would not (mostly) get the performance we wanted and also sacrificing the cost..

try to do 2 things at the same time = bad

p/s: tis is juz a logical thinking of mine. laugh.gif laugh.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 19 2009, 01:05 AM
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 09:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


many ppl jump ship oooo
sony better do something.
or else....
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 09:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Feb 20 2009, 09:51 PM)
ya lo...sony's accessories so expensive...despite their bodies are cheap...
*
u spoke my mind out.
in alphanatics... i guess less than 10 ppl own a 18250, 16105


This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 20 2009, 09:54 PM
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 10:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Feb 20 2009, 09:56 PM)
even a 50mm f1.8 cost rm200-rm300....but for a 2nd hand minolta 50mm f1.7 cost rm500-rm600  cry.gif
*
50mm 1.8? Am I being outdated after some new lens? blink.gif
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 10:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


I see. Haha..
That's why ppl jumping ship. Lol.
Sony ship is a luxury cruiser...
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 10:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Hurm. 4 entry level, 2 semi pro and pro DSLR.
Can't expect much from entry-level users right? Me oso use kitty lens.
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 10:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


It's a bit underexposed. Maybe because lacking highlight tone... You shot it at night?
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 20 2009, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Maybe ambient light was drown by flash light.. Instead, try reshot with piece of black board behind it, using brighter aperture. I saw siddiq's experimenting was nice. smile.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 20 2009, 10:49 PM
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 21 2009, 05:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(albnok @ Feb 20 2009, 11:49 PM)
SinnerBuyer: The 18-250mm is a popular lens. Remember that there are a lot more Sony users than there are on the forum, and not everybody documents their purchases online.

Also, there is no 16-105mm equivalent in any other brand. Nothing else starts at 16mm and ends at 105mm.

The Nikkor 18-200mm VR is more expensive than the Sony 18-250mm.
*
nod.gif Oh. laugh.gif
Stick with Alpha nod.gif


Added on February 21, 2009, 5:36 pm
QUOTE(NewCell @ Feb 21 2009, 04:24 PM)
I just came back from lowyat. so sad most of the camera shop has run out of cobra.......  doh.gif
*
Daging Cobra manyak sedap. drool.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 21 2009, 05:36 PM
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 22 2009, 08:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Feb 22 2009, 07:24 PM)
haha, tomorrow have 1 hour join my company photo club on learning exposure  laugh.gif
*
ur company is?? blink.gif
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 22 2009, 08:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(vcxv @ Feb 22 2009, 05:18 PM)

6. user posted image
*
Somehow I love this WB.. Kinda unique tongue.gif
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 22 2009, 08:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Feb 22 2009, 07:24 PM)
haha, tomorrow have 1 hour join my company photo club on learning exposure  laugh.gif
*
woots the hella-kaluyah
me training in intel also~~ brows.gif i guess ur photo session must be organized by IPVC.
haha. my department here got 2 nikon, 1 canon, 1 alpha (not me). notworthy.gif
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 22 2009, 09:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(vcxv @ Feb 22 2009, 09:10 PM)
i've always like the creativity in achew's work.
why dont you try make the green apple having the same shape as mac logo?
*
I like his previous pic - a small box-robot shows at a ball. the bigger box-robot looks with the weird face...
It's funny and replicated exactly like human...
SinnerBuyer
post Feb 25 2009, 06:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


If budget is really an issue, try go for 2nd hand Alpha.
There's a lot of ppl selling (jump ship + financial prob), that's a loss for them and a reward for new Alpha user.
Then get an UWA.

Just an alternative. smile.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Feb 25 2009, 06:58 PM
SinnerBuyer
post Mar 2 2009, 02:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Mar 1 2009, 08:49 AM)
Let say i shooting in museum with low light condition. How to deal with it? what is the setting should I used? I used f4.5 with 1/3 shutter speed, it gives me good light output (from camera view) but the problem is it's too slow and gives me blur image once transfer to pc ..
Tripod is the best option then. smile.gif
But you can try to shoot when the SSS indicator shows 1 bar. Often it will work. wink.gif
2 seconds self-timer works like a charm too.

QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Mar 1 2009, 12:37 PM)
shit, there are rats in my hostel....walk here and there... can pangsai in my room  vmad.gif

shit, so scare it bite my fastpack 250 and my camera & lenses sweat.gif luckily havent buy flash gun, else risk increase
*
Get a Cobra - rat sure will scared. laugh.gif

QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Mar 1 2009, 10:32 PM)
ya, i heard befor, like convertor some thing hmm.gif


Added on March 1, 2009, 10:39 pmafter filter all the photos, left 3 can just to show ppl

MengKuang Dam shoot. C&C welcome. Arigato!  notworthy.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Nice pictah!!!!
SinnerBuyer
post Mar 2 2009, 08:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Mar 2 2009, 08:12 PM)
which one is cheaper in term of lens for canon, sony and nikon? .. biggrin.gif .
*
We can't say which one was cheaper.
Becoz "someone" will come in and 'diao' us. it will cause chaotic as everyone has their own point.
So, go and do some research by yourself. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by SinnerBuyer: Mar 2 2009, 08:42 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0460sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 10:23 PM